Construction of regulatory network for alopecia areata progression and identification of immune monitoring genes based on multiple machine-learning algorithms

Objectives Alopecia areata(AA)is an autoimmune-related non-cicatricial alopecia,with complete alopecia(AT)or generalized alopecia(AU)as severe forms of AA.However,there are limitations in early identification of AA,and intervention of AA patients who may progress to severe AA will help to improve the incidence rate and prognosis of severe AA.Methods We obtained two AA-related datasets from the gene expression omnibus database,identified the differentially expressed genes(DEGs),and identified the module genes most related to severe AA through weighted gene co-expression network analysis.Functional enrichment analysis,construction of a protein–protein interaction network and competing endogenous RNA network,and immune cell infiltration analysis were performed to clarify the underlying biological mechanisms of severe AA.Subsequently,pivotal immune monitoring genes(IMGs)were screened through multiple machine-learning algorithms,and the diagnostic effectiveness of the pivotal IMGs was validated by receiver operating characteristic.Results A total of 150 severe AA-related DEGs were identified;the upregulated DEGs were mainly enriched in immune response,while the downregulated DEGs were mainly enriched in pathways related to hair cycle and skin development.Four IMGs(LGR5,SHISA2,HOXC13,and S100A3)with good diagnostic efficiency were obtained.As an important gene of hair follicle stem cells stemness,we verified in vivo that LGR5 downregulation may be an important link leading to severe AA.Conclusion Our findings provide a comprehensive understanding of the pathogenesis and underlying biological processes in patients with AA,and identification of four potential IMGs,which is helpful for the early diagnosis of severe AA.

Consensus on the application of negative pressure wound therapy of diabetic foot wounds

Because China is becoming an aging society,the incidence of diabetes and diabetic foot have been increasing.Diabetic foot has become one of the main health-related killers due to its high disability and mortality rates.Negative pressure wound therapy(NPWT)is one of the most effective techniques for the treatment of diabetic foot wounds and great progress,both in terms of research and its clinical application,has been made in the last 20 years of its development.However,due to the complex pathogenesis and management of diabetic foot,irregular application of NPWT often leads to complications,such as infection,bleeding and necrosis,that seriously affect its treatment outcomes.In 2020,under the leadership of Burns,Trauma and Tissue Repair Committee of the Cross-Straits Medicine Exchange Association,the writing group for‘Consensus on the application of negative pressure wound therapy of diabetic foot wounds’was established with the participation of scholars from the specialized areas of burns,endocrinology,vascular surgery,orthopedics and wound repair.Drawing on evidence-based practice suggested by the latest clinical research,this consensus proposes the best clinical practice guidelines for the application and prognostic evaluation of NPWT for diabetic foot.The consensus aims to support the formation of standardized treatment schemes that clinicians can refer to when treating cases of diabetic foot.

Efficacy and safety of external tissue expansion technique in the treatment of soft tissue defects:a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and complication rates

Background:Currently,various external tissue expansion devices are becoming widely used.Considering the scarcity of relevant application standards,this systematic review was performed to explore the effectiveness and safety of external tissue expansion techniques for the reconstruction of soft tissue defects.Method:A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of external tissue expansion technique was conducted.A comprehensive search was performed in the following electronic databases:PubMed/Medline,Embase,Cochrane Library(Wiley Online Library),andWeb of Science.Studies reporting patients with soft tissue defects under the treatment of external tissue expansion technique were included.Results:A total of 66 studies with 22 different types of external tissue expansion devices met the inclusion criteria.We performed a descriptive analysis of different kinds of devices.A single-arm meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the external tissue expansion technique for different aetiologies.The pooled mean wound healing time among patients with defects after fasciotomy was 10.548 days[95%confidence interval(CI)=5.796-15.299].The pooled median wound healing times of patients with defects after excisional surgery,trauma,chronic ulcers and abdominal defects were 11.218 days(95%CI=6.183-16.253),11.561 days(95%CI=7.062-16.060),15.956 days(95%CI=11.916-19.996)and 12.853 days(95%CI=9.444-16.227),respectively.The pooled wound healing rates of patients with defects after fasciotomy,excisional surgery,trauma,chronic ulcers and abdominal defects were 93.8%(95%CI=87.1-98.2%),97.2%(95%CI=92.2-99.7%),97.0%(95%CI=91.2-99.8%),99.5%(95%CI=97.6-100%),and 96.8%(95%CI=79.2-100%),respectively.We performed a subgroup analysis in patients with diabetic ulcers and open abdominal wounds.The pooled median wound healing time of patients with diabetic ulcers was 11.730 days(95%CI=10.334-13.125).The pooled median wound healing time of patients with open abdomen defects was 48.810 days(95%CI=35.557-62.063)and the pooled successful healing rate was 68.8%(95%CI=45.9-88.1%).A total of 1686 patients were included,265(15.7%)of whom experienced complications.The most common complication was dehiscence(n=53,3.14%).Conclusions:Our systematic review is the first to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of external tissue expansion in the management of soft tissue defects.However,we must interpret the meta-analysis results with caution considering the limitations of this review.Large-scale randomized controlled trials and long-term follow-up studies are still needed to confirm the effectiveness and evaluate the quality of healing.