期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Source parameter and rupture process of the M_W6.3 early strong aftershock immediately following the 2016 M_W7.8 Kaikoura earthquake(New Zealand)
1
作者 Qingjun Meng Aizhi Guo +1 位作者 Xiangteng wang shuofan wang 《Earthquake Science》 2019年第1期1-11,共11页
The 2016 A/w7.8 Kaikoura(New Zealand)earthquake was the most complex event ever instrumentally recorded and geologically investigated,as it ruptured on more than 12 fault segments of various geometries.To study the ma... The 2016 A/w7.8 Kaikoura(New Zealand)earthquake was the most complex event ever instrumentally recorded and geologically investigated,as it ruptured on more than 12 fault segments of various geometries.To study the mainshock rupture characteristics,geodetic methods like InSAR and GPS play an essential role in providing satisfactory spatial resolution.However,early strong aftershocks may cause extra ground deformation which bias the mainshock rupture inversion result.In this paper,we will focus on studying the Mw 6.3 aftershock,which is the only A/6+thrust slip aftershock that occurred only 30 minutes after the Kaikoura mainshock.We will relocate the hypocenter of this event using the hypo 2000 method,make the finite fault model(FFM)inversion for the detailed rupture processes and calculate the synthetic surface displacement to compare with the observed GPS data and figure out its influence on the mainshock study.Although we are not able to resolve the real ruptured fault of this event because of limited observation data,we infer that it is a west-ward dipping event of oblique slip mechanism,consistent with the subfault geometries of the Kaikoura mainshock.According to the inverted FFM,this event can generate 10-20 cm ground surface displacement and affect the ground displacement observation at nearby GPS stations. 展开更多
关键词 Kaikoura mainshock AFTERSHOCK finite fault model surface displacement
下载PDF
Causative fault and seismogenic mechanism of the 2010 Suining M5.0 earthquake from joint modeling of seismic and InSAR data 被引量:1
2
作者 wangwang GU Sidao NI +9 位作者 shuofan wang Baolong ZHANG Xinglin LEI Risheng CHU Aizhi GUO Qiang SHEN Hansheng wang Liming JIANG Minhan SHENG Jiajun CHONG 《Science China Earth Sciences》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2023年第8期1825-1838,共14页
Although the Sichuan basin is a stable block with low historical seismicity,the Suining M5.0 earthquake on January31,2010 occurred near the center of the basin,causing casualty and substantial damage.Previous studies ... Although the Sichuan basin is a stable block with low historical seismicity,the Suining M5.0 earthquake on January31,2010 occurred near the center of the basin,causing casualty and substantial damage.Previous studies have shown that the earthquake is very shallow and may occur in the sedimentary cover rocks,but its causative fault has not been identified.Based on local broadband seismic waveform data as well as a pair of ALOS PALSAR ascending orbit data,we explore the seismogenic mechanism via further constraining the source depth and the ruptured fault.The earthquake caused ground uplift in the southeast of the epicenter area,with a maximum line of sight displacement of about 13.6 cm,much larger than the displacement caused by a M5 earthquake at a typical depth of 10 km,which indicates that the earthquake is very shallow.Through joint inversion of seismic waveform and InSAR data,we obtain the moment magnitude of Suining earthquake as MW4.5,with the strike,dip,and rake of its fault plane as 17°,66° and 90°,respectively,and the centroid depth less than 1 km,supporting that the earthquake occurred at the shallow part of a high angle thrust fault dipping to the southeast.It is further confirmed that the earthquake may be triggered by the diffusion of high-pressure fluid migrating from the underside gas reservoir. 展开更多
关键词 Suining earthquake Seismogenic fault Source depth INSAR Seismic waveform Joint inversion
原文传递
云南景谷地震震源深度:新生断裂脆韧性转换带深度探讨 被引量:5
3
作者 王烁帆 曾祥方 +1 位作者 王向腾 王清东 《科学通报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第4期474-484,共11页
地震深度能够约束地壳流变结构,成熟断裂的脆韧性转换带深度为10km左右,而存在于古老稳定地块的新生断裂上,地壳脆韧性转换带深度在地壳浅部数千米处.但是构造活动区新生断裂的相关研究较少,2014年10月7日云南景谷M_w6.1地震为此提供了... 地震深度能够约束地壳流变结构,成熟断裂的脆韧性转换带深度为10km左右,而存在于古老稳定地块的新生断裂上,地壳脆韧性转换带深度在地壳浅部数千米处.但是构造活动区新生断裂的相关研究较少,2014年10月7日云南景谷M_w6.1地震为此提供了一个较为难得的案例.本文使用基于Pn/Pg相对定位方法和CAP(cutand paste)方法分别反演得到了景谷主震和2次5级以上余震的震源起始破裂深度和矩心深度.主震的起始深度为9.5km,矩心深度为5.0km,主震破裂于深部然后向浅部发展,而2次余震可能表现为圆盘式破裂,其震源矩心深度与起始深度较为接近.综合大地电磁测深结果和区域流变结构,发现3次地震的深度与电性高低阻分界面和岩石强度拐点深度接近,由此可以认为这一新生断裂的脆韧性转换深度约为10km.此次景谷地震研究结果表明,构造活动强烈区新生断裂的脆韧性转换带深度与成熟断裂类似,不同于古老稳定地块新生断裂的流变结构. 展开更多
关键词 新生断裂 脆韧性转换带 地壳流变结构 震源深度 景谷地震
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部