Objective: This study aims to compare the effects of different drainage tube diameters (22F vs. 26F) combined with negative pressure suction on patients after valve replacement surgery, including postoperative indicat...Objective: This study aims to compare the effects of different drainage tube diameters (22F vs. 26F) combined with negative pressure suction on patients after valve replacement surgery, including postoperative indicators and complications. Methods: A total of 104 patients undergoing valve replacement surgery were included and divided into a 22F group (45 patients) and a 26F group (59 patients). The basic characteristics, postoperative ICU stay duration, drainage duration, postoperative complications, and pain scores were compared between the two groups. All data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software, with p Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex, and underlying diseases. The ICU stay duration and drainage duration showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). The total drainage volume in the 22F group was significantly lower than that in the 26F group (225 vs. 380 ml, p = 0.035), and the pain scores on the third postoperative day were also significantly lower in the 22F group (p Conclusion: Compared to the 26F group, patients in the 22F group exhibited less postoperative drainage volume and lower pain scores, suggesting that the 22F drainage tube may have better clinical outcomes after valve replacement surgery.展开更多
文摘Objective: This study aims to compare the effects of different drainage tube diameters (22F vs. 26F) combined with negative pressure suction on patients after valve replacement surgery, including postoperative indicators and complications. Methods: A total of 104 patients undergoing valve replacement surgery were included and divided into a 22F group (45 patients) and a 26F group (59 patients). The basic characteristics, postoperative ICU stay duration, drainage duration, postoperative complications, and pain scores were compared between the two groups. All data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software, with p Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex, and underlying diseases. The ICU stay duration and drainage duration showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). The total drainage volume in the 22F group was significantly lower than that in the 26F group (225 vs. 380 ml, p = 0.035), and the pain scores on the third postoperative day were also significantly lower in the 22F group (p Conclusion: Compared to the 26F group, patients in the 22F group exhibited less postoperative drainage volume and lower pain scores, suggesting that the 22F drainage tube may have better clinical outcomes after valve replacement surgery.
