Identification of metastasis-associated genes in colorectal cancer through an integrated genomic and transcriptomic analysis

Objective： Identification of colorectal cancer （CRC） metastasis genes is one of the most important issues in CRC research. For the purpose of mining CRC metastasis-associated genes, an integrated analysis of mJcroarray data was presented, by combined with evidence acquired from comparative genornic hybridization （CGH） data. Methods： Gene expression profile data of CRC samples were obtained at Gene Expression Omnibus （GEO） website. The 15 important chromosomal aberration sites detected by using CGH technology were used for integrated genomic and transcriptomic analysis. Significant Analysis of Microarray （SAM） was used to detect significantly differentially expressed genes across the whole genome. The overlapping genes were selected in their corresponding chromosomal aberration regions, and analyzed by using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery （DAVID）. Finally, SVM-T-RFE gene selection algorithm was applied to identify ted genes in CRC. Results： A minimum gene set was obtained with the minimum number [14] of genes, and the highest classification accuracy （100%） in both PRI and META datasets. A fraction of selected genes are associated with CRC or its metastasis. Conclusions- Our results demonstrated that integration analysis is an effective strategy for mining cancer- associated genes.

Multi-class cancer classification through gene expression profiles: microRNA versus mRNA

Both microRNA （miRNA） and mRNA expression profiles are important methods for cancer type classification. A comparative study of their classification performance will be helpful in choosing the means of classification. Here we evaluated the classification performance of miRNA and mRNA profiles using a new data mining approach based on a novel SVM （Support Vector Machines） based recursive fea- ture elimination （nRFE） algorithm. Computational experiments showed that information encoded in miRNAs is not sufficient to classify cancers; gut-derived samples cluster more accurately when using mRNA expression profiles compared with using miRNA profiles; and poorly differentiated tumors （PDT） could be classified by mRNA expression profiles at the accuracy of 100% versus 93.8% when using miRNA profiles. Furthermore, we showed that mRNA expression profiles have higher capacity in normal tissue classifications than miRNA. We concluded that classification performance using mRNA profiles is superior to that of miRNA profiles in multiple-class cancer classifications.