期刊文献+
共找到1篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
A Comparison of Value Elicitation Question Formats in Multiple-Good Contingent Valuation
1
作者 Chih-Chen Liu Joseph A. Herriges +3 位作者 C. L. Kling silvia secchi Joan I. Nassauer Daniel J. Phaneuf 《Frontiers of Economics in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities》 2014年第1期85-108,共24页
This paper provides a convergent validity test of two types of multinomial choice questions vis-a-vis a dichotomous choice question by formally testing whether these stated preference elicitation question formats prov... This paper provides a convergent validity test of two types of multinomial choice questions vis-a-vis a dichotomous choice question by formally testing whether these stated preference elicitation question formats provide comparable welfare estimates. In particular, a dichotomous choice question, a traditional multinomial choice question, and a modified multinomial choice question suggested by Carson and Groves (2007) were applied in split samples to assess the influence of the informational and incentive properties on the respondents' annual willingness to accept compensation for adopting costly conservation practices in agriculture that benefit the environment. Our findings suggest that the two multinomial choice question formats elicit a similar mean willingness to accept distributions, but they are both different from a standarddichotomous choice question. Further, the willingness to accept distributions derived from the multinomial choice question formats are more dispersed than those from the dichotomous choice question. 展开更多
关键词 stated preference choice experiment dichotomous choice incentive compatibility multinomial choice
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部