There have been numerous studies done to explore the diagnostic performance of quanti- tative diffusion-weighted （DW） MR imaging to differentiate between benign and malignant pancre- atic masses. However, the result...There have been numerous studies done to explore the diagnostic performance of quanti- tative diffusion-weighted （DW） MR imaging to differentiate between benign and malignant pancre- atic masses. However, the results have been inconsistent. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate whether DW-MR imaging can differentiate between these two diseases. Databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were utilized to find relevant articles published between January 2001 and January 2014. A Stata version 12.0 and a Meta-Disc version 1.4 were used to de- scribe primary results. Twelve studies with 594 patients, which fulfilled the inclusion criteria, were enrolled for the analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of DW imaging was 0.91 （95% CI： 0.84, 0.95） and 0.86 （95% CI： 0.76, 0.93） respectively. The area under the curve of the summary re- ceiver operating characteristic was 0.95 （95% CI： 0.93, 0.96）. The results indicated that DW imaging might be a valuable tool for differentiating benign and malignant pancreatic masses.展开更多
基金supported by the Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Sichuan Province,China(No.2012JQ0060)
文摘There have been numerous studies done to explore the diagnostic performance of quanti- tative diffusion-weighted （DW） MR imaging to differentiate between benign and malignant pancre- atic masses. However, the results have been inconsistent. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate whether DW-MR imaging can differentiate between these two diseases. Databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were utilized to find relevant articles published between January 2001 and January 2014. A Stata version 12.0 and a Meta-Disc version 1.4 were used to de- scribe primary results. Twelve studies with 594 patients, which fulfilled the inclusion criteria, were enrolled for the analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of DW imaging was 0.91 （95% CI： 0.84, 0.95） and 0.86 （95% CI： 0.76, 0.93） respectively. The area under the curve of the summary re- ceiver operating characteristic was 0.95 （95% CI： 0.93, 0.96）. The results indicated that DW imaging might be a valuable tool for differentiating benign and malignant pancreatic masses.
