BACKGROUND The prevalence of post-natal depression(PND)is high in India,as it is in many other low to middle income countries.There is an urgent need to identify PND and treat the mother as early as possible.Among the...BACKGROUND The prevalence of post-natal depression(PND)is high in India,as it is in many other low to middle income countries.There is an urgent need to identify PND and treat the mother as early as possible.Among the many paper and pencil tests available to identify PND,the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale(EPDS)is a widely used and validated measure in India.However,the summary diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility data are not available for this measure.AIM To establish summary data for the global diagnostic accuracy parameter as well as the clinical utility of the non-English versions of the EPDS in India.METHODS Two researchers independently searched the PubMed,EMBASE,MEDKNOW and IndMED databases for published papers,governmental publications,conference proceedings and grey literature from 2000-2018.Seven studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of EPDS in five Indian languages against DSM/ICD were included in the final analysis.Two other investigators extracted the Participants’details,Index measures,Comparative reference measures,and Outcomes of diagnostic accuracy data,and appraised the study quality using QUADS-2.Deek’s plots were used to evaluate publication bias.We used the area under the curve of the hierarchical summary area under the receiver operating characteristic curve,with the random effect model,to summarize the global diagnostic accuracy of EPDS.Using the 2×2 table,we calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios.From the likelihood ratios,the Fagan’s nomogram was built for evaluating clinical utility using the Bayesian approach.We calculated the 95%confidence interval(95%CI)whenever indicated.STATA(version 15)with MIDAS and METANDI modules were used.RESULTS There was no publication bias.The area under the curve for EPDS was 0.97(95%CI:0.95-0.98).The pre-test probability for the nomogram was 22%.For a positive likelihood ratio of 9,the positive post-test probability was 72%(95%CI:68%,76%)and for a negative LR of 0.08,the negative post-test probability was 2%(95%CI:1%,3%).CONCLUSION In this meta-analysis,we established the summary global diagnostic parameter and clinical utility of the non-English versions of the EPDS in India.This work demonstrates that these non-English versions are accurate in their diagnosis of PND and can help clinicians in their diagnostic reasoning.展开更多
BACKGROUND Emergence delirium(EmD)is a troublesome motoric,emotional,and cognitive disturbance associated with morbidity.It is often misdiagnosed despite being present in a substantial proportion of children and adole...BACKGROUND Emergence delirium(EmD)is a troublesome motoric,emotional,and cognitive disturbance associated with morbidity.It is often misdiagnosed despite being present in a substantial proportion of children and adolescents during emergence from anesthesia.AIM To evaluate the summary diagnostic accuracy of Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale(PAEDS)for EmD among children and adolescents.METHODS Two researchers electronically and hand searched the published literature from May 2004 to February 2021 that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of PAEDS for EmD among children and adolescents,using appropriate terms.Two independent researchers extracted the diagnostic parameters and appraised the study quality with QUADAS-2.Overall,the diagnostic accuracy of the measures was calculated with the summary receiver operating characteristic curve(SROC),the summary sensitivity and specificity,and diagnostic odds ratio(DOR)for EmD.Various diagnostic cut-off points were evaluated for their diagnostic accuracy.Heterogeneity was analyzed by meta-regression.RESULTS Nine diagnostic accuracy studies of EmD that conformed to our selection criteria and PRISMA guidelines were included in the final analysis.There was no publication bias.The area under the SROC was 0.97(95%confidence interval[CI]:95%-98%).Summary sensitivity and specificity were 0.91(95%CI:0.81-0.96;I2=92.93%)and 0.94(95%CI:0.89-0.97;I2=87.44%),respectively.The summary DOR was 148.33(95%CI:48.32-455.32).The effect size for the subgroup analysis of PAEDS cut-off scores of<10,≥10,and≥12 was 3.73,2.19,and 2.93,respectively;they were not statistically significantly different.The setting of the study and reference standard were statistically significantly related to the sensitivity of PAEDS but not specificity.CONCLUSION The PAEDS is an accurate diagnostic measure for the diagnosis of EmD among children and adolescents.Further studies should document its clinical utility.展开更多
BACKGROUND Burden due to intellectual disability(ID) is only third to the depressive disorders and anxiety disorders in India. This national burden significantly contributes to the global burden of ID and hence one ha...BACKGROUND Burden due to intellectual disability(ID) is only third to the depressive disorders and anxiety disorders in India. This national burden significantly contributes to the global burden of ID and hence one has to think globally and act locally to reduce this burden. At its best the collective prevalence of ID is in the form of narrative reviews. There is an urgent need to document the summary prevalence of ID to enhance further policymaking, national programs and resource allocation.AIM To establish the summary prevalence of ID during the past 60 years in India.METHODS Two researchers independently and electronically searched Pub Med, Scopus, and the Cochrane library from January 1961 to December 2020 using appropriate search terms. Two other investigators extracted the study design, setting, participant characteristics, and measures used to identify ID. Two other researchers appraised the quality of the studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal format for Prevalence Studies. Funnel plot and Egger’s regression test were used to ascertain the publication and small study effect on the prevalence. To evaluate the summary prevalence of ID, we used the random effects model with arcsine square-root transformation. Heterogeneity of I^(2)≥ 50% was considered substantial and we determined the heterogeneity with meta-regression. The analyses were performed using STATA(version 16).RESULTS Nineteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was publication bias;the trim-and-fill method was used to further ascertain bias. Concerns with control of confounders and the reliable measure of outcome were noted in the critical appraisal. The summary prevalence of ID was 2% [(95%CI: 2%, 3%);I^(2)= 98%] and the adjusted summary prevalence was 1.4%. Meta-regression demonstrated that age of the participants was statistically significantly related to the prevalence;other factors did not influence the prevalence or heterogeneity.CONCLUSION The summary prevalence of ID in India was established to be 2% taking into consideration the individual prevalence studies over the last six decades. This knowledge should improve the existing disability and mental health policies, national programs and service delivery to reduce the national and global burden associated with ID.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND The prevalence of post-natal depression(PND)is high in India,as it is in many other low to middle income countries.There is an urgent need to identify PND and treat the mother as early as possible.Among the many paper and pencil tests available to identify PND,the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale(EPDS)is a widely used and validated measure in India.However,the summary diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility data are not available for this measure.AIM To establish summary data for the global diagnostic accuracy parameter as well as the clinical utility of the non-English versions of the EPDS in India.METHODS Two researchers independently searched the PubMed,EMBASE,MEDKNOW and IndMED databases for published papers,governmental publications,conference proceedings and grey literature from 2000-2018.Seven studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of EPDS in five Indian languages against DSM/ICD were included in the final analysis.Two other investigators extracted the Participants’details,Index measures,Comparative reference measures,and Outcomes of diagnostic accuracy data,and appraised the study quality using QUADS-2.Deek’s plots were used to evaluate publication bias.We used the area under the curve of the hierarchical summary area under the receiver operating characteristic curve,with the random effect model,to summarize the global diagnostic accuracy of EPDS.Using the 2×2 table,we calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios.From the likelihood ratios,the Fagan’s nomogram was built for evaluating clinical utility using the Bayesian approach.We calculated the 95%confidence interval(95%CI)whenever indicated.STATA(version 15)with MIDAS and METANDI modules were used.RESULTS There was no publication bias.The area under the curve for EPDS was 0.97(95%CI:0.95-0.98).The pre-test probability for the nomogram was 22%.For a positive likelihood ratio of 9,the positive post-test probability was 72%(95%CI:68%,76%)and for a negative LR of 0.08,the negative post-test probability was 2%(95%CI:1%,3%).CONCLUSION In this meta-analysis,we established the summary global diagnostic parameter and clinical utility of the non-English versions of the EPDS in India.This work demonstrates that these non-English versions are accurate in their diagnosis of PND and can help clinicians in their diagnostic reasoning.
文摘BACKGROUND Emergence delirium(EmD)is a troublesome motoric,emotional,and cognitive disturbance associated with morbidity.It is often misdiagnosed despite being present in a substantial proportion of children and adolescents during emergence from anesthesia.AIM To evaluate the summary diagnostic accuracy of Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale(PAEDS)for EmD among children and adolescents.METHODS Two researchers electronically and hand searched the published literature from May 2004 to February 2021 that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of PAEDS for EmD among children and adolescents,using appropriate terms.Two independent researchers extracted the diagnostic parameters and appraised the study quality with QUADAS-2.Overall,the diagnostic accuracy of the measures was calculated with the summary receiver operating characteristic curve(SROC),the summary sensitivity and specificity,and diagnostic odds ratio(DOR)for EmD.Various diagnostic cut-off points were evaluated for their diagnostic accuracy.Heterogeneity was analyzed by meta-regression.RESULTS Nine diagnostic accuracy studies of EmD that conformed to our selection criteria and PRISMA guidelines were included in the final analysis.There was no publication bias.The area under the SROC was 0.97(95%confidence interval[CI]:95%-98%).Summary sensitivity and specificity were 0.91(95%CI:0.81-0.96;I2=92.93%)and 0.94(95%CI:0.89-0.97;I2=87.44%),respectively.The summary DOR was 148.33(95%CI:48.32-455.32).The effect size for the subgroup analysis of PAEDS cut-off scores of<10,≥10,and≥12 was 3.73,2.19,and 2.93,respectively;they were not statistically significantly different.The setting of the study and reference standard were statistically significantly related to the sensitivity of PAEDS but not specificity.CONCLUSION The PAEDS is an accurate diagnostic measure for the diagnosis of EmD among children and adolescents.Further studies should document its clinical utility.
文摘BACKGROUND Burden due to intellectual disability(ID) is only third to the depressive disorders and anxiety disorders in India. This national burden significantly contributes to the global burden of ID and hence one has to think globally and act locally to reduce this burden. At its best the collective prevalence of ID is in the form of narrative reviews. There is an urgent need to document the summary prevalence of ID to enhance further policymaking, national programs and resource allocation.AIM To establish the summary prevalence of ID during the past 60 years in India.METHODS Two researchers independently and electronically searched Pub Med, Scopus, and the Cochrane library from January 1961 to December 2020 using appropriate search terms. Two other investigators extracted the study design, setting, participant characteristics, and measures used to identify ID. Two other researchers appraised the quality of the studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal format for Prevalence Studies. Funnel plot and Egger’s regression test were used to ascertain the publication and small study effect on the prevalence. To evaluate the summary prevalence of ID, we used the random effects model with arcsine square-root transformation. Heterogeneity of I^(2)≥ 50% was considered substantial and we determined the heterogeneity with meta-regression. The analyses were performed using STATA(version 16).RESULTS Nineteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was publication bias;the trim-and-fill method was used to further ascertain bias. Concerns with control of confounders and the reliable measure of outcome were noted in the critical appraisal. The summary prevalence of ID was 2% [(95%CI: 2%, 3%);I^(2)= 98%] and the adjusted summary prevalence was 1.4%. Meta-regression demonstrated that age of the participants was statistically significantly related to the prevalence;other factors did not influence the prevalence or heterogeneity.CONCLUSION The summary prevalence of ID in India was established to be 2% taking into consideration the individual prevalence studies over the last six decades. This knowledge should improve the existing disability and mental health policies, national programs and service delivery to reduce the national and global burden associated with ID.
