Management of recurrent rectal cancer:A population based study in greater Amsterdam

AIM： To analyze, retrospectively in a populationbased study, the management and survival of patients with recurrent rectal cancer initially treated with a macroscopically radical resection obtained with total mesorectal excision （TME）. METHODS： All rectal carcinomas diagnosed during 1998 to 2000 and initially treated with a macroscopically radical resection （632 patients） were selected from the Amsterdam Cancer Registry. For patients with recurrent disease, information on treatment of the recurrence was collected from the medical records. RESULTS： Local recurrence with or without clinically apparent distant dissemination occurred in 62 patients （10%）. Thirty-two patients had an isolated local recurrence. Ten of these 32 patients （31%） underwent radical re-resection and experienced the highest survival （three quarters survived for at least 3 years）. Eight patients （25%） underwent non-radical surgery （median survival 24 rno）, seven patients （22%） were treated with radio- and/or chemotherapy without surgery （median survival 15 mo） and seven patients （22%） only received best supportive care （median survival 5 too）. Distant dissemination occurred in 124 patients （20%） of whom 30 patients also had a local recurrence. The majority （54%） of these patients were treated with radio- and/or chemotherapy without surgery （median survival 15 mo）. Twenty-seven percent of these patients only received best supportive care （median survival 6 mo）, while 16% underwent surgery for their recurrence. Survival was best in the latter group （median survival 32 mo）. CONCLUSION： Although treatment options and survival are limited in case of recurrent rectal cancer after radical local resection obtained with TME, patients can benefit from additional treatment, especially if a radical resection is feasible.

Current status of ultrasound-guided surgery in the treatment of breast cancer

The primary goal of breast-conserving surgery(BCS) is to obtain tumour-free resection margins. Margins positive or focally positive for tumour cells are associated with a high risk of local recurrence, and in the case of tumour-positive margins, re-excision or even mastectomy are sometimes needed to achieve definite clear margins. Unfortunately, tumour-involved margins and re-excisions after lumpectomy are still reported in up to 40% of patients and additionally, unnecessary large excision volumes are described. A secondary goal of BCS is the cosmetic outcome and one of the main determinants of worse cosmetic outcome is a large excision volume. Up to 30% of unsatisfied cosm-etic outcome is reported. Therefore, the search for better surgical techniques to improve margin status, excision volume and consequently, cosmetic outcome has continued. Nowadays, the most commonly used localization methods for BCS of non-palpable breast cancers are wire-guided localization(WGL) and radioguided localization(RGL). WGL and RGL are invasive procedures that need to be performed pre-operatively with technical and scheduling difficulties. For palpable breast cancer, tumour excision is usually guided by tactile skills of the surgeon performing "blind" surgery. One of the surgical techniques pursuing the aims of radicality and small excision volumes includes intraoperative ultrasound(IOUS). The best evidence available demonstrates benefits of IOUS with a significantly high proportion of negative margins compared with other localization techniques in palpable and non-palpable breast cancer. Additionally, IOUS is non-invasive, easy to learn and can centralize the tumour in the excised specimen with low amount of healthy breast tissuebeing excised. This could lead to better cosmetic results of BCS. Despite the advantages of IOUS, only a small amount of surgeons are performing this technique. This review aims to highlight the position of ultrasoundguided surgery for malignant breast tumours in the search for better oncological and cosmetic outcomes.