PURPOSE: Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with nonpedunculated submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma remain to be characterized. This study examines the relationship between lymph node metastasis ...PURPOSE: Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with nonpedunculated submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma remain to be characterized. This study examines the relationship between lymph node metastasis and clinicopathologic factors in nonpedunculated submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: The study cohort comprised 155 patients who had undergone surgical treatment for nonpedunculated submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma. The clinicopathologic factors investigated included gender, age, tumor location, macroscopic type, tumor size, histologic type and grade, intramucosal growth pattern, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, degree of focal dedifferentiation at the submucosal invasive front, status of the remaining muscularis mucosa, and the depth and width of submucosal invasion. RESULTS: Lymph node metastases were found in 19 patients (12.3 percent). Univariate analysis showed that lymphatic invasion, focal dedifferentiation at the submucosal invasive front, status of the remaining muscularis mucosa, and depth of submucosal invasion all had a significant influence on lymph node metastasis. Multivariate analysis showed lymphatic invasion (P = 0.014) and high-grade focal dedifferentiation at the submucosal invasive front (P = 0.049) to be independent factors predicting lymph node metastasis. No lymph node metastasis was found in tumors with a depth of submucosal invasion of < 1.3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphatic invasion and high-grade focal dedifferentiation at the submucosal invasive front are important predictors of lymph node metastasis in patients with nonpedunculated submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma. Depth of submucosal invasion can be used as an identifying marker for patients who do not require subsequent surgery after endoscopic resection.展开更多
PURPOSE: If it were possible to identify the features of primary colorectal carcinoma that were associated with liver metastasis, these features could be used as predictors of liver metastasis. METHODS: From January 1...PURPOSE: If it were possible to identify the features of primary colorectal carcinoma that were associated with liver metastasis, these features could be used as predictors of liver metastasis. METHODS: From January 1995 to December 1997, 648 consecutive cases of colorectal carcinoma were recorded at the Department of Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. We evaluated clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical factors (age, gender, tumor location, gross type, size, histologic type, dedifferentiation of invasive front, depth of invasion, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, lymph-node metastasis, and expression of CD10, MUC2, and human gastric mucin) in 505 of these patients who had undergone resection of T2/T3/T4 colorectal carcinomas to clarify the correlation between these factors and liver metastasis. RESULTS: Liver metastases, including unresectable, were detected in 122 patients (24 percent), all of whom had been followed for at least five years. Univariate analysis revealed that liver metastasis was significantly associated with tumor size, histologic type, dedifferentiation of invasive front, depth of invasion, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, lymph-node metastasis, and CD10 expression. Multivariate analysis revealed that invasion deeper than the subserosa, venous invasion, lymph-node metastasis, and CD10 expression were significantly associated with liver metastases. CONCLUSIONS: CD10 expression in colorectal carcinoma is a good predictor of liver metastasis.展开更多
文摘PURPOSE: Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with nonpedunculated submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma remain to be characterized. This study examines the relationship between lymph node metastasis and clinicopathologic factors in nonpedunculated submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: The study cohort comprised 155 patients who had undergone surgical treatment for nonpedunculated submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma. The clinicopathologic factors investigated included gender, age, tumor location, macroscopic type, tumor size, histologic type and grade, intramucosal growth pattern, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, degree of focal dedifferentiation at the submucosal invasive front, status of the remaining muscularis mucosa, and the depth and width of submucosal invasion. RESULTS: Lymph node metastases were found in 19 patients (12.3 percent). Univariate analysis showed that lymphatic invasion, focal dedifferentiation at the submucosal invasive front, status of the remaining muscularis mucosa, and depth of submucosal invasion all had a significant influence on lymph node metastasis. Multivariate analysis showed lymphatic invasion (P = 0.014) and high-grade focal dedifferentiation at the submucosal invasive front (P = 0.049) to be independent factors predicting lymph node metastasis. No lymph node metastasis was found in tumors with a depth of submucosal invasion of < 1.3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphatic invasion and high-grade focal dedifferentiation at the submucosal invasive front are important predictors of lymph node metastasis in patients with nonpedunculated submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma. Depth of submucosal invasion can be used as an identifying marker for patients who do not require subsequent surgery after endoscopic resection.
文摘PURPOSE: If it were possible to identify the features of primary colorectal carcinoma that were associated with liver metastasis, these features could be used as predictors of liver metastasis. METHODS: From January 1995 to December 1997, 648 consecutive cases of colorectal carcinoma were recorded at the Department of Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. We evaluated clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical factors (age, gender, tumor location, gross type, size, histologic type, dedifferentiation of invasive front, depth of invasion, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, lymph-node metastasis, and expression of CD10, MUC2, and human gastric mucin) in 505 of these patients who had undergone resection of T2/T3/T4 colorectal carcinomas to clarify the correlation between these factors and liver metastasis. RESULTS: Liver metastases, including unresectable, were detected in 122 patients (24 percent), all of whom had been followed for at least five years. Univariate analysis revealed that liver metastasis was significantly associated with tumor size, histologic type, dedifferentiation of invasive front, depth of invasion, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, lymph-node metastasis, and CD10 expression. Multivariate analysis revealed that invasion deeper than the subserosa, venous invasion, lymph-node metastasis, and CD10 expression were significantly associated with liver metastases. CONCLUSIONS: CD10 expression in colorectal carcinoma is a good predictor of liver metastasis.
