Background:A green roof is a man-made ecosystem created when a rooftop is covered with substrate and vegetation.Although green roof ecosystems(GREs)are able to provide ecosystem services,there is currently no assessme...Background:A green roof is a man-made ecosystem created when a rooftop is covered with substrate and vegetation.Although green roof ecosystems(GREs)are able to provide ecosystem services,there is currently no assessment tool available to specifically evaluate this.Therefore,the aim of this study was to develop a rapid assessment checklist(RAC)to assess GRE services(GRES),which was developed and tested on 10 green roofs in Bangkok,Thailand.Results:The RAC consisted of 46 proxy indicators(33 qualitative and 13 quantitative indicators)encompassing various aspects of GRESs.The GRES values or scores varied according to structural differences in the green roofs.The average score(from a maximum of 100)of total ecosystem services was 61±7,which could be inferred as a good performance in ecosystem service provision.The highest scores were obtained from the regulating services at 68±7.The lowest average score was 53±11 from the provisioning services.Conclusions:The RAC was able to evaluate the levels of GRES provided by the selected green roofs,enabling the meaningful comparison of their potential capability to provide GRES.Therefore,this RAC could be an innovative tool for evaluation of four categories of GRES.展开更多
基金This research was supported by the 90th Anniversary of Chulalongkorn University,Rachadapisek Sompote Fund(GCUGR1125603028D No.25)RP was financially supported by the Development and Promotion of Science and Technology Talents Scholarship.
文摘Background:A green roof is a man-made ecosystem created when a rooftop is covered with substrate and vegetation.Although green roof ecosystems(GREs)are able to provide ecosystem services,there is currently no assessment tool available to specifically evaluate this.Therefore,the aim of this study was to develop a rapid assessment checklist(RAC)to assess GRE services(GRES),which was developed and tested on 10 green roofs in Bangkok,Thailand.Results:The RAC consisted of 46 proxy indicators(33 qualitative and 13 quantitative indicators)encompassing various aspects of GRESs.The GRES values or scores varied according to structural differences in the green roofs.The average score(from a maximum of 100)of total ecosystem services was 61±7,which could be inferred as a good performance in ecosystem service provision.The highest scores were obtained from the regulating services at 68±7.The lowest average score was 53±11 from the provisioning services.Conclusions:The RAC was able to evaluate the levels of GRES provided by the selected green roofs,enabling the meaningful comparison of their potential capability to provide GRES.Therefore,this RAC could be an innovative tool for evaluation of four categories of GRES.
