BACKGROUND The prognosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)that is not indicated for curative hepatectomy remains poor,despite advances in the treatment of HCC,including the development of tyrosine kinase inhib...BACKGROUND The prognosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)that is not indicated for curative hepatectomy remains poor,despite advances in the treatment of HCC,including the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors(TKIs).The outcomes of reduction hepatectomy and multidisciplinary postoperative treatment for advanced HCC that is not indicated for curative hepatectomy,including those of recently treated cases,should be investigated.AIM To examine the outcomes of combination treatment with reduction hepatectomy and multidisciplinary postoperative treatment for advanced HCC that is not indicated for curative hepatectomy.METHODS Thirty cases of advanced HCC that were not indicated for curative hepatectomy,in which reduction hepatectomy was performed between 2000 and 2018 at the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I,Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine,were divided into postoperative complete remission(POCR)(+)and POCR(-)groups,depending on whether POCR of all evaluable lesions was achieved through postoperative treatment.The cases in the POCR(-)group were subdivided into POCR(-)TKI(+)and POCR(-)TKI(-)groups,depending on whether TKIs were administered postoperatively.RESULTS The 5-year overall survival rate and mean survival time(MST)after reduction hepatectomy were 15.7%and 28.40 mo,respectively,for all cases;37.5%and 56.55 mo,respectively,in the POCR(+)group;and 6.3%and 14.84 mo,respectively,in the POCR(-)group(P=0.0041).Tumor size,major vascular invasion,and the number of tumors in the remnant liver after the reduction hepatectomy were also found to be related to survival outcomes.The number of tumors in the remnant liver was the only factor that differed significantly between the POCR(+)and POCR(-)groups,and POCR was achieved significantly more frequently when≤3 tumors remained in the remnant liver(P=0.0025).The MST was 33.52 mo in the POCR(-)TKI(+)group,which was superior to the MST of 10.74 mo seen in the POCR(-)TKI(-)group(P=0.0473).CONCLUSION Reduction hepatectomy combined with multidisciplinary postoperative treatment for unresectable advanced HCC that was not indicated for curative hepatectomy was effective when POCR was achieved via multidisciplinary postoperative therapy.To achieve POCR,reduction hepatectomy should aim to ensure that≤3 tumors remain in the remnant liver.Even in cases in which POCR is not achieved,combined treatment with reduction hepatectomy and multidisciplinary therapy can improve survival outcomes when TKIs are administered.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND The prognosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)that is not indicated for curative hepatectomy remains poor,despite advances in the treatment of HCC,including the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors(TKIs).The outcomes of reduction hepatectomy and multidisciplinary postoperative treatment for advanced HCC that is not indicated for curative hepatectomy,including those of recently treated cases,should be investigated.AIM To examine the outcomes of combination treatment with reduction hepatectomy and multidisciplinary postoperative treatment for advanced HCC that is not indicated for curative hepatectomy.METHODS Thirty cases of advanced HCC that were not indicated for curative hepatectomy,in which reduction hepatectomy was performed between 2000 and 2018 at the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I,Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine,were divided into postoperative complete remission(POCR)(+)and POCR(-)groups,depending on whether POCR of all evaluable lesions was achieved through postoperative treatment.The cases in the POCR(-)group were subdivided into POCR(-)TKI(+)and POCR(-)TKI(-)groups,depending on whether TKIs were administered postoperatively.RESULTS The 5-year overall survival rate and mean survival time(MST)after reduction hepatectomy were 15.7%and 28.40 mo,respectively,for all cases;37.5%and 56.55 mo,respectively,in the POCR(+)group;and 6.3%and 14.84 mo,respectively,in the POCR(-)group(P=0.0041).Tumor size,major vascular invasion,and the number of tumors in the remnant liver after the reduction hepatectomy were also found to be related to survival outcomes.The number of tumors in the remnant liver was the only factor that differed significantly between the POCR(+)and POCR(-)groups,and POCR was achieved significantly more frequently when≤3 tumors remained in the remnant liver(P=0.0025).The MST was 33.52 mo in the POCR(-)TKI(+)group,which was superior to the MST of 10.74 mo seen in the POCR(-)TKI(-)group(P=0.0473).CONCLUSION Reduction hepatectomy combined with multidisciplinary postoperative treatment for unresectable advanced HCC that was not indicated for curative hepatectomy was effective when POCR was achieved via multidisciplinary postoperative therapy.To achieve POCR,reduction hepatectomy should aim to ensure that≤3 tumors remain in the remnant liver.Even in cases in which POCR is not achieved,combined treatment with reduction hepatectomy and multidisciplinary therapy can improve survival outcomes when TKIs are administered.