Assessment of the validity of the clinical pathway for colon endoscopic submucosal dissection

AIM: To determine the effective hospitalization period as the clinical pathway to prepare patients for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study which included 189 patients consecutively treated by ESD at the National Cancer Center Hospital from May 2007 to March 2009. Patients were divided into 2 groups; patients in group A were discharged in 5 d and patients in group B included those who stayed longer than 5 d. The following data were collected for both groups: mean hospitalization period, tumor site, median tumor size, post-ESD rectal bleeding requiring urgent endoscopy, perforation during or after ESD, abdominal pain, fever above 38 ℃, and blood test results positive for inflammatory markers before and after ESD. Each parameter was compared after data collection. RESULTS: A total of 83% (156/189) of all patients could be discharged from the hospital on day 3 postESD. Complications were observed in 12.1% (23/189) of patients. Perforation occurred in 3.7% (7/189) of patients. All the perforations occurred during the ESD procedure and they were managed with endoscopic clipping. The incidence of post-operative bleeding was 2.6% (5/189); all the cases involved rectal bleeding. We divided the subjects into 2 groups: tumor diameter ≥ 4 cm and < 4 cm; there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.93, χ 2 test with Yates correction). The incidence of abdominal pain was 3.7% (7/189). All the cases occurred on the day of the procedure or the next day. The median white blood cell count was 6800 ± 2280 (cells/μL; ± SD) for group A, and 7700 ± 2775 (cells/μL; ± SD) for group B, showing a statistically significant difference (P = 0.023, t-test). The mean C-reactive protein values the day after ESD were 0.4 ± 1.3 mg/dL and 0.5 ± 1.3 mg/dL for groups A and B, respectively, with no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.54, t -test). CONCLUSION: One-day admission is sufficient in the absence of complications during ESD or early postoperative bleeding.

Management and associated factors of delayed perforation after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

AIM: To identify the actual clinical management and associated factors of delayed perforation after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD).METHODS: A total of 4943 early gastric cancer(EGC) patients underwent ESD at our hospital between January 1999 and June 2012. We retrospectively assessed the actual management of delayed perforation. In addition, to determine the factors associated with delayed perforation, after excluding 123 EGC patients with perforations that occurred during the ESD procedure, we analyzed the following clinicopathological factors among the remaining 4820 EGC patients by comparing the ESD cases with delayed perforation and the ESD cases without perforation: age, sex, chronological periods, clinical indications for ESD, status of the stomach, location, gastric circumference, tumor size, invasion depth, presence/absence of ulceration, histological type, type of resection, and procedure time.RESULTS: Delayed perforation occurred in 7(0.1%) cases. The median time until the occurrence of delayed perforation was 11 h(range, 6-172 h). Three(43%) of the 7 cases required emergency surgery, while four were conservatively managed without surgical intervention. Among the 4 cases with conservative management, 2 were successfully managed endoscopically using the endoloop-endoclip technique. The median hospital stay was 18 d(range, 15-45 d). There were no delayed perforation-related deaths. Based on a multivariate analysis, gastric tube cases(OR = 11.0; 95%CI: 1.7-73.3; P = 0.013) were significantly associated with delayed perforation.CONCLUSION: Endoscopists must be aware of not only the identified factors associated with delayed perforation, but also how to treat this complicationeffectively and promptly.

Condyloma acuminatum of the anal canal,treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection

Condyloma acuminatum(CA) is a common sexually transmitted disease caused by human papilloma virus infection. Not all individuals develop persistent, progressive disease, but careful follow up is required with moderate-to-severe dysplasia to prevent progression to malignancy. Standard therapies include surgical treatments(trans-anal resection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery) and immunotherapeutic and topical methods(topical imiquimod); however, local recurrence remains a considerable problem. Here, we report a case with superficial CA of the anal canal, treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD). A 28-year-old man presented with a chief complaint of hematochezia. Digital exam did not detect a tumor. Screening colonoscopy revealed 10-mm long, whitish condyles extending from the anal canal to the lower rectum. The lesion covered almost the whole circumference, and only a small amount of normal mucosa remained. Magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging showed brownish hairpin-shaped, coiled capillaries. Although histopathological diagnosis by biopsy revealed CA, accurate histological differentiation between CA, papilloma, and squamous cell carcinoma can be difficult with a small specimen. Therefore, weperformed diagnostic ESD, which provides a complete specimen for precise histopathological evaluation. The pathological diagnosis was CA, with moderate dysplasia(anal intraepithelial neoplasia 2). There was no recurrence at 16 mo after the initial ESD. Compared to surgical treatment, endoscopic diagnosis and resection could be performed simultaneously and the tumor margin observed clearly with a magnifying chromocolonoscopy, resulting in less recurrence. These findings suggest that endoscopic resection may be an alternative method for CA that prevents recurrence.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms:A review

The introduction of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)has expanded the application of endoscopic treatment,which can be used for lesions with a low metastatic potential regardless of their size.ESD has the advantage of achieving en bloc resection with a lower local recurrence rate compared with that of piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection.Moreover,in the past,surgery was indicated in patients with large lesions spreading to almost the entire circumference of the rectum,regardless of the depth of invasion,as endoscopic resection of these lesions was technically difficult.Therefore,a prime benefit of ESD is significant improvement in the quality of life for patients who have large rectal lesions.On the other hand,ESD is not as widely applied in the treatment of colorectal neoplasms as it is in gastric cancers owing to the associated technical difficulty,longer procedural duration,and increased risk of perforation.To diversify the available endoscopic treatment strategies for superficial colorectal neoplasms,endoscopists performing ESD need torecognize its indications,the technical issues involved in its application,and the associated complications.This review outlines the methods and type of devices used for colorectal ESD,and the training required by endoscopists to perform this procedure.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for large laterally spreading tumors involving the ileocecal valve and terminal ileum

Endoscopic submucosal dissection is a challenging technique that enables en-bloc resection for large colorectal tumors, as laterally spreading tumors, particularly difficult, if the ileocecal valve and terminal ileum is involved. Herein, we report on one of 4 cases. The procedures, using a bipolar needle knife (B-Knife) to reduce the perforation risk and carbon dioxide instead of conventional air insufflation for patient comfort, achieved curative resections without any complications.

Size does not determine the grade of malignancy of early invasive colorectal cancer

AIM:To clarify the clinicopathological characteristics of small and large early invasive colorectal cancers(EI-CRCs),and to determine whether malignancy grade depends on size.METHODS:A total of 583 consecutive EI-CRCs treated by endoscopic mucosal resection or surgery at the National Cancer Center Hospital between 1980 and 2004 were enrolled in this study.Lesions were classified into two groups based on size:small(≤10mm) and large(>10mm).Clinicopathological features,incidence of lymph node metastasis(LNM) and risk factors for LNM,such as depth of invasion,lymphovascular invasion(LVI) and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma(PDA) were analyzed in all resected specimens.RESULTS:There were 120(21%) small and 463(79%) large lesions.Histopathological analysis of the small lesion group revealed submucosal deep cancer(sm:≥1000 μm) in 90(75%) cases,LVI in 26(22%) cases,and PDA in 12(10%) cases.Similarly,the large lesion group exhibited submucosal deep cancer in 380(82%) cases,LVI in 125(27%) cases,and PDA in 79(17%) cases.The rate of LNM was 11.2% and 12.1% in the small and large lesion groups,respectively.CONCLUSION:Small EI-CRC demonstrated the same aggressiveness and malignant potential as large cancer.

Successful endoscopic closure of a colonic perforation one day after endoscopic mucosal resection of a lesion in the transverse colon

A 73-year-old man underwent endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR) of a 20-mm flat elevated lesion on the transverse colon. The morning after the procedure, he started to have severe right upper quadrant pain after his first meal. A computed tomography scan revealed free air and a stomach filled with food. He was diagnosed to have delayed post-EMR intestinal perforation. He underwent emergent colonoscopy and clipping of the perforated site. He was discharged 8 d after the endoscopic closure without the need for surgical intervention. The meal was not the cause of the colon transversum perforation.