Background: Improving and sustaining the quality of nursing care is an intractable and persistent challenge. The patient experience of nursing care can give a different perspective on nursing quality and help clinica...Background: Improving and sustaining the quality of nursing care is an intractable and persistent challenge. The patient experience of nursing care can give a different perspective on nursing quality and help clinical nursing staff to direct quality improvement. Attempts to identify what is patient experience,the relationship with nursing care, and the application of patient experience in nursing quality improvement practice, in order to provide advices for constructing the quality standards and quality improvement strategies of nursing care.Methods: We conducted a literature review of original research publications. The database platforms Pubmed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI) and Wanfang were searched from inception until end of August 2015. After screening retrieved articles, 40 sources(articles and organizational websites) were selected for analysis for the connotation, development and application of patient experience in nursing quality researches.Results: Our study identified several concepts about patient experience, roughly sorted out the development path of patient experience in worldwide and the application of patient experience in nursing quality improvement. It points out four precautions when applying patient experience in nursing quality improvement, which are differentiating patient satisfaction and patient experience, choosing appropriate data collection method and appropriate feedback time, and the last but the most important, applying theories to actual clinical practice.Conclusions: Professional indexes are important to maintain the care quality, but it cannot fully reflect quality of nursing care, which needs patient experience as the supplement. Nursing staffs need to make more efforts to enhance patient's nursing care experience, and apply the research results to clinical practice, and finally make patient-centered care come true. For future study, the evaluation system and management strategies about patient experience need to be developed to guide nursing quality improvement.展开更多
Pelvic floor muscle exercise(PFME)is the most common con servative manageme nt for urinary incon tine nee(Ul)after radical prostatectomy(RP).However,whether the PFME guided by a therapist(G-PFME)can contribute to the ...Pelvic floor muscle exercise(PFME)is the most common con servative manageme nt for urinary incon tine nee(Ul)after radical prostatectomy(RP).However,whether the PFME guided by a therapist(G-PFME)can contribute to the recovery of urinary continenee for patients after RP is still controversial.We performed this meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness of G-PFME on Ul after RP and to explore whether the additional preoperative G-PFME is superior to postoperative G-PFME alone.Literature search was con ducted on Cochra ne Library,Embase,Web of Scie nee,and PubMed,to obtai n all re leva nt randomized controlled trials published before March 1,2018.Outcome data were pooled and an a lyzed with Review Man ager 5.3 to compare the conti nence rates of G-PFME with control and to compare additional preoperative G-PFME with postoperative G-PFME.Twenty-two articles with 2647 patients were included.The conti nence rates of G?PFME were all superior to con trol at d iff ere nt follow-up time points,with the odds ratio(OR)(95%confidence interval[Cl])of 2.79(1.53-5.07),2.80(1.87-4.19),2.93(1.19-7.22),4.11(2.24-7.55),and 2.41(1.33-4.36)at 1 mon th,3 months,4 months,6 months,and 12 months after surgery,respectively.However,there was no difference between additional preoperative G-PFME and postoperative G-PFME,with the OR(95%Cl)of 1.70(0.56-5.11)and 1.35(0.41-4.40)at 1 month and 3 months after RP,respectively.G-PFME could improve the recovery of urinary continence at both early and Iong-term stages.Starting the PFME preoperatively might not produce extra benefits for patients at early stage,compared with postoperative PFME.展开更多
基金supported by General Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.71573097)
文摘Background: Improving and sustaining the quality of nursing care is an intractable and persistent challenge. The patient experience of nursing care can give a different perspective on nursing quality and help clinical nursing staff to direct quality improvement. Attempts to identify what is patient experience,the relationship with nursing care, and the application of patient experience in nursing quality improvement practice, in order to provide advices for constructing the quality standards and quality improvement strategies of nursing care.Methods: We conducted a literature review of original research publications. The database platforms Pubmed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI) and Wanfang were searched from inception until end of August 2015. After screening retrieved articles, 40 sources(articles and organizational websites) were selected for analysis for the connotation, development and application of patient experience in nursing quality researches.Results: Our study identified several concepts about patient experience, roughly sorted out the development path of patient experience in worldwide and the application of patient experience in nursing quality improvement. It points out four precautions when applying patient experience in nursing quality improvement, which are differentiating patient satisfaction and patient experience, choosing appropriate data collection method and appropriate feedback time, and the last but the most important, applying theories to actual clinical practice.Conclusions: Professional indexes are important to maintain the care quality, but it cannot fully reflect quality of nursing care, which needs patient experience as the supplement. Nursing staffs need to make more efforts to enhance patient's nursing care experience, and apply the research results to clinical practice, and finally make patient-centered care come true. For future study, the evaluation system and management strategies about patient experience need to be developed to guide nursing quality improvement.
基金a grant from the Natural Science Foundation of China(No.71573097).
文摘Pelvic floor muscle exercise(PFME)is the most common con servative manageme nt for urinary incon tine nee(Ul)after radical prostatectomy(RP).However,whether the PFME guided by a therapist(G-PFME)can contribute to the recovery of urinary continenee for patients after RP is still controversial.We performed this meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness of G-PFME on Ul after RP and to explore whether the additional preoperative G-PFME is superior to postoperative G-PFME alone.Literature search was con ducted on Cochra ne Library,Embase,Web of Scie nee,and PubMed,to obtai n all re leva nt randomized controlled trials published before March 1,2018.Outcome data were pooled and an a lyzed with Review Man ager 5.3 to compare the conti nence rates of G-PFME with control and to compare additional preoperative G-PFME with postoperative G-PFME.Twenty-two articles with 2647 patients were included.The conti nence rates of G?PFME were all superior to con trol at d iff ere nt follow-up time points,with the odds ratio(OR)(95%confidence interval[Cl])of 2.79(1.53-5.07),2.80(1.87-4.19),2.93(1.19-7.22),4.11(2.24-7.55),and 2.41(1.33-4.36)at 1 mon th,3 months,4 months,6 months,and 12 months after surgery,respectively.However,there was no difference between additional preoperative G-PFME and postoperative G-PFME,with the OR(95%Cl)of 1.70(0.56-5.11)and 1.35(0.41-4.40)at 1 month and 3 months after RP,respectively.G-PFME could improve the recovery of urinary continence at both early and Iong-term stages.Starting the PFME preoperatively might not produce extra benefits for patients at early stage,compared with postoperative PFME.