Conditions in Yemen involving armed confict and all kinds of structural challenges have also their impact on the fate of its built heritage.Yemen’s three World Heritage Sites have their particular signifcance,all of ...Conditions in Yemen involving armed confict and all kinds of structural challenges have also their impact on the fate of its built heritage.Yemen’s three World Heritage Sites have their particular signifcance,all of them representing a region with its own cultural background:Sanaa in the highlands,Zabid in the coastal Tihama,and Shibam in the remote desert valley of Hadramaut.Unlike the Old City of Sanaa,the two smaller sites struggle with the limited resources of low-developed hinterland.Both preserve a unique urban culture:Zabid with its many elements of elaborate artistry and a vernacular architecture highly adapted to tropical conditions,and Shibam as a dense structure of unique mud-built tower houses.Preservation in a background of poverty,weak capacities of ofcial structures,and even war destruction risks can only succeed in connection with active engagement and commitment of the community,which however is heterogeneous and heritage preservation is not always their priority.Efcient strategies must therefore link local livelihood interests to preservation concerns.Market quarter and housing rehabilitation in both cities in last years had wide backing,supported income and resulted in visible upgrading of the very heart of these cities—showing locals recovery of historic structures has its potentials—even in the extreme conditions of Yemen.展开更多
文摘Conditions in Yemen involving armed confict and all kinds of structural challenges have also their impact on the fate of its built heritage.Yemen’s three World Heritage Sites have their particular signifcance,all of them representing a region with its own cultural background:Sanaa in the highlands,Zabid in the coastal Tihama,and Shibam in the remote desert valley of Hadramaut.Unlike the Old City of Sanaa,the two smaller sites struggle with the limited resources of low-developed hinterland.Both preserve a unique urban culture:Zabid with its many elements of elaborate artistry and a vernacular architecture highly adapted to tropical conditions,and Shibam as a dense structure of unique mud-built tower houses.Preservation in a background of poverty,weak capacities of ofcial structures,and even war destruction risks can only succeed in connection with active engagement and commitment of the community,which however is heterogeneous and heritage preservation is not always their priority.Efcient strategies must therefore link local livelihood interests to preservation concerns.Market quarter and housing rehabilitation in both cities in last years had wide backing,supported income and resulted in visible upgrading of the very heart of these cities—showing locals recovery of historic structures has its potentials—even in the extreme conditions of Yemen.
