Does manual thrombus aspiration help optimize stent implantation in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction?

AIM: To evaluate the impact of thrombus aspiration(TA) on procedural outcomes in a real-world ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) registry.METHODS: From May 2006 to August 2008, 542 consecutive STEMI patients referred for primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention were enrolled and the angiographic results and stent implantation characteristics were compared according to the performance of manual TA.RESULTS: A total of 456 patients were analyzable and categorized in TA group(156 patients; 34.2%) and non-TA(NTA) group(300 patients; 65.8%). Patientstreated with TA had less prevalence of multivessel disease(39.7% vs 54.7%, P = 0.003) and higher prevalence of initial thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow 【 3(P 【 0.001) than NTA group. There was a higher rate of direct stenting(58.7% vs 45.5%, P = 0.009), with shorter(24.1 ± 11.8 mm vs 26.9 ± 15.7 mm, P = 0.038) and larger stents(3.17 ± 0.43 mm vs 2.93 ± 0.44 mm, P 【 0.001) in the TA group as compared to NTA group. The number of implanted stents(1.3 ± 0.67 vs 1.5 ± 0.84, P = 0.009) was also lower in TA group. CONCLUSION: In an “all-comers” STEMI population, the use of TA resulted in more efficient procedure leading to the implantation of less number of stents per lesion of shorter lengths and larger sizes.

Medical management of connector pin thrombosis with the Amplatzer cardiac plug left atrial closure device

Transcatheter closure of the left atrial appendage with the Amplatzer cardiac plug device and double antiplatelet treatment for 3 mo has become an alternative treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation at high embolism risk and contraindications for chronic oral anticoagulation.The inadequate implantation of the left atrial appendage closure device and the discontinuation of double antiplatelet therapy are well-known as factors related to device thrombosis.Nevertheless,device thrombosis after adequate implantation requiring surgical treatment or restarting chronic oral anticoagulation has been reported and can reach 15% of patients.The connector pin thrombosis of the Amplatzer cardiac plug,despite a good adherence to antiplatelet treatment,has been recently described as a potential mechanism for device thrombosis.Our clinical case reports the management of this condition for the first time,showing that the early detection of thrombotic complications by transesophageal echocardiography permits solving this serious complication with medical treatment only.

Cardiac embolism after implantable cardiac defibrillator shock in non-anticoagulated atrial fibrillation:The role of left atrial appendage occlusion

Cardioembolic events are one of the most feared complications in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation(NVAF) and a formal contraindication to oral anticoagulation(OAC).The present case report describes a case of massive peripheral embolism after an implantable cardiac defibrillator(ICD) shock in a patient with NVAF and a formal contraindication to OAC due to previous intracranial hemorrhage.In order to reduce the risk of future cardioembolic events,the patient underwent percutaneous left atrial appendage(LAA) occlusion.A 25 mm AmplatzerTM Amulet was implanted and the patient was discharged the following day without complications.The potential risk of thrombus dislodgement after an electrical shock in patients with NVAF and no anticoagulation constitutes a particular scenario that might be associated with an additional cardioembolicrisk.Although LAA occlusion is a relatively new technique,its usage is rapidly expanding worldwide and constitutes a very valid alternative for patients with NVAF and a formal contraindication to OAC.