原文出处SCHÜNEMANN H J,CUELLO C,AKL E A,et al.GRADE guidelines:18.How ROBINS⁃I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence.J Clin Epi...原文出处SCHÜNEMANN H J,CUELLO C,AKL E A,et al.GRADE guidelines:18.How ROBINS⁃I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence.J Clin Epidemiol,2019,111:105-114.原文通讯作者SCHÜNEMANN H J,email:schunch@mcmaster.ca说明本文解读者根据对原文理解解读,可能不完全反映原文的思想。本文表1、图1和2为原文翻译,已通过Copyright Clearance Center's RightsLink服务购买了使用权。展开更多
A new test method for single interior right angle in a corner cube prism is presented. Some key points and parameters are analyzed and derived. The advantage of this method is concluded by comparing with some current ...A new test method for single interior right angle in a corner cube prism is presented. Some key points and parameters are analyzed and derived. The advantage of this method is concluded by comparing with some current conventional methods.展开更多
文摘原文出处SCHÜNEMANN H J,CUELLO C,AKL E A,et al.GRADE guidelines:18.How ROBINS⁃I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence.J Clin Epidemiol,2019,111:105-114.原文通讯作者SCHÜNEMANN H J,email:schunch@mcmaster.ca说明本文解读者根据对原文理解解读,可能不完全反映原文的思想。本文表1、图1和2为原文翻译,已通过Copyright Clearance Center's RightsLink服务购买了使用权。
文摘A new test method for single interior right angle in a corner cube prism is presented. Some key points and parameters are analyzed and derived. The advantage of this method is concluded by comparing with some current conventional methods.