Background:Ophthalmic ambulatory surgery is preferred to be performed under general anesthesia either by total intravenous anesthesia(TIVA)or by inhalational anesthesia to increase the patient comfort.However,anesthes...Background:Ophthalmic ambulatory surgery is preferred to be performed under general anesthesia either by total intravenous anesthesia(TIVA)or by inhalational anesthesia to increase the patient comfort.However,anesthesia-controlled time(ACT)can cause increased non-operative operating room(OR)time which may adversely affect the ORs efficiency.This study was aimed to compare the ACT of desflurane with that of propofol-remifentanil in strabismus ambulatory surgery.Methods:From November 2016 to December 2017,a total of 200 strabismus patients(aged 18-60 years old,and scheduled for elective ambulatory surgery at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center)were randomly assigned to receive either propofol-based TIVA(group TIVA)or desflurane anesthesia(group DES)for maintenance of anesthesia.The primary outcome was the extubation time.Secondary outcomes included surgical time,anesthetic time,OR exit time,and Phase I and II recovery time.The intraoperative incidences of hypotension,bradycardia and oculocardiac reflex(OCR),and the incidences of any post-operative complications were recorded.Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square or Fisher exact tests were used to compare the two groups.Results:We found that the extubation time(5.5[3.9-7.0]vs.9.7[8.5-11.4]min,P<0.001)and the incidence of prolonged time to extubation(0 vs.6%,P=0.029)in the DES group were significantly decreased compared with those in the TIVA group.The patients in the DES group displayed shorter OR exit time as compared with that in the TIVA group(7.3[5.5-8.7]vs.10.8[9.3-12.3]min,P<0.001).The patients using desflurane exhibited more stable hemodynamics during surgery than the patients using propofol-based TIVA,as demonstrated by lower incidences of hypotension(1%vs.22%,P<0.001),bradycardia(2%vs.13%,P=0.002),and OCR(17%vs.44%,P<0.001).Conclusion:DES enhanced the ophthalmic OR efficiency by reducing the extubation time and OR exit time,and provided more stable hemodynamics intra-operatively than TIVA in patients undergoing strabismus ambulatory surgery.Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov,No.NCT02922660;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02922660?id=NCT02922660&draw=2&rank=1.展开更多
基金supported by a grant of Clinical Research Project of the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center of Sun Yat-sen University(No.3030901010073).
文摘Background:Ophthalmic ambulatory surgery is preferred to be performed under general anesthesia either by total intravenous anesthesia(TIVA)or by inhalational anesthesia to increase the patient comfort.However,anesthesia-controlled time(ACT)can cause increased non-operative operating room(OR)time which may adversely affect the ORs efficiency.This study was aimed to compare the ACT of desflurane with that of propofol-remifentanil in strabismus ambulatory surgery.Methods:From November 2016 to December 2017,a total of 200 strabismus patients(aged 18-60 years old,and scheduled for elective ambulatory surgery at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center)were randomly assigned to receive either propofol-based TIVA(group TIVA)or desflurane anesthesia(group DES)for maintenance of anesthesia.The primary outcome was the extubation time.Secondary outcomes included surgical time,anesthetic time,OR exit time,and Phase I and II recovery time.The intraoperative incidences of hypotension,bradycardia and oculocardiac reflex(OCR),and the incidences of any post-operative complications were recorded.Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square or Fisher exact tests were used to compare the two groups.Results:We found that the extubation time(5.5[3.9-7.0]vs.9.7[8.5-11.4]min,P<0.001)and the incidence of prolonged time to extubation(0 vs.6%,P=0.029)in the DES group were significantly decreased compared with those in the TIVA group.The patients in the DES group displayed shorter OR exit time as compared with that in the TIVA group(7.3[5.5-8.7]vs.10.8[9.3-12.3]min,P<0.001).The patients using desflurane exhibited more stable hemodynamics during surgery than the patients using propofol-based TIVA,as demonstrated by lower incidences of hypotension(1%vs.22%,P<0.001),bradycardia(2%vs.13%,P=0.002),and OCR(17%vs.44%,P<0.001).Conclusion:DES enhanced the ophthalmic OR efficiency by reducing the extubation time and OR exit time,and provided more stable hemodynamics intra-operatively than TIVA in patients undergoing strabismus ambulatory surgery.Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov,No.NCT02922660;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02922660?id=NCT02922660&draw=2&rank=1.
