Let φ be an Orlicz function that has a complementary function φ* and let lφ be an Orlicz sequence space. We prove a similar version of Rearrangement Inequality and Chebyshev's Sum Inequality in lφ FX, the Freml...Let φ be an Orlicz function that has a complementary function φ* and let lφ be an Orlicz sequence space. We prove a similar version of Rearrangement Inequality and Chebyshev's Sum Inequality in lφ FX, the Fremlin projective tensor product of lφ with a Banach lattice X, and in lφ iX, the Wittstock injective tensor product of lφ with a Banach lattice X.展开更多
In 1934, Hardy, Littlewood and Polya introduced a rearrangement inequality:∑i=1,aib(m+1-i)≤∑i=1maibp(i)≤∑i=1,aibi,in which the real sequences {ai}i and {bi}i are in increasing order, and p(i) indicates a ...In 1934, Hardy, Littlewood and Polya introduced a rearrangement inequality:∑i=1,aib(m+1-i)≤∑i=1maibp(i)≤∑i=1,aibi,in which the real sequences {ai}i and {bi}i are in increasing order, and p(i) indicates a random permutation. We now consider a sequence in lp with 1 〈 p 〈 ∞, and a sequence in a Banach lattice X. Instead of normal multiplication, we consider the tensor product of lp and X. We show that in Wittstock injective tensor product, lp iX, and Fremlin projective tensor product, lp FX, the rearrangement inequality still exists.展开更多
文摘Let φ be an Orlicz function that has a complementary function φ* and let lφ be an Orlicz sequence space. We prove a similar version of Rearrangement Inequality and Chebyshev's Sum Inequality in lφ FX, the Fremlin projective tensor product of lφ with a Banach lattice X, and in lφ iX, the Wittstock injective tensor product of lφ with a Banach lattice X.
文摘In 1934, Hardy, Littlewood and Polya introduced a rearrangement inequality:∑i=1,aib(m+1-i)≤∑i=1maibp(i)≤∑i=1,aibi,in which the real sequences {ai}i and {bi}i are in increasing order, and p(i) indicates a random permutation. We now consider a sequence in lp with 1 〈 p 〈 ∞, and a sequence in a Banach lattice X. Instead of normal multiplication, we consider the tensor product of lp and X. We show that in Wittstock injective tensor product, lp iX, and Fremlin projective tensor product, lp FX, the rearrangement inequality still exists.