期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
早期食管基底细胞样鳞状细胞癌的内镜特征及预后分析 被引量:1
1
作者 庄惠军 陈进忠 +9 位作者 苏虹 王海星 雷天霞 吴建海 杨炜琳 郑永胜 陈金海 许国幸 张宏斌 谢逸林 《中国内镜杂志》 2023年第3期50-55,共6页
目的研究早期食管基底细胞样鳞状细胞癌(EBSCC)的内镜特征、治疗效果及预后。方法回顾性分析2014年1月-2020年12月该院发现并行ESD治疗的早期EBSCC患者32例(EBSCC组),纳入同期行内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗的普通典型早期食管鳞状细胞癌(... 目的研究早期食管基底细胞样鳞状细胞癌(EBSCC)的内镜特征、治疗效果及预后。方法回顾性分析2014年1月-2020年12月该院发现并行ESD治疗的早期EBSCC患者32例(EBSCC组),纳入同期行内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗的普通典型早期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者96例作为对照组(ESCC组),对比分析两组患者年龄、性别、肿瘤大小、肿瘤浸润深度、内镜特征、治疗结果及生存率等。结果两组患者发病年龄(P=0.746)、性别(P=0.506)、肿瘤大小(P=0.423)和肿瘤浸润深度(P=0.914)比较,差异均无统计学意义。两组患者肿瘤均好发于食管中段,内镜下分型以0-Ⅱb型为主,所有病灶表面黏膜均粗糙和/或糜烂,放大内镜观察上皮内乳头状毛细血管袢(IPCL),以B1型为主,两组患者比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。EBSCC组较ESCC组病灶表面白斑出现的概率更高,差异有统计学意义(56.25%和26.04%,χ^(2)=9.88,P=0.002)。碘液染色:EBSCC组有17例(53.12%)为不染或淡染,15例(46.88%)有斑驳状不染改变(即碘不染区域中可见岛状染色斑点或者深染斑点);ESCC组有72例(75.00%)为不染或淡染,24例(25.00%)有斑驳状不染改变,两组患者碘液染色后改变比较,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=5.42,P=0.020)。两组患者治疗后生存率比较,差异无统计学意义(93.75%和96.88%,χ^(2)=0.62,P=0.429)。结论早期EBSCC内镜下表现不一致,病灶表面白斑、碘液染色后呈斑驳状不染改变和放大内镜结合窄带成像技术观察到B型血管,提示可能存在基底细胞样鳞状细胞癌(BSCC)成分。早期治疗EBSCC可提高患者生存率,改善预后。 展开更多
关键词 食管基底细胞样鳞状细胞癌 内镜特征 早期治疗 生存率 内镜黏膜下剥离术
下载PDF
Efficacy and safety profile of two-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in cancer patients:An observational study in China
2
作者 Sheng-Wei Cai Jin-Yan Chen +3 位作者 Rong Wan De-Jian Pan wei-lin yang Ren-Gui Zhou 《World Journal of Clinical Cases》 SCIE 2022年第31期11411-11418,共8页
BACKGROUND The new coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARSCoV-2)has produced a global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19),resulting in modifications to public health policies on a u... BACKGROUND The new coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARSCoV-2)has produced a global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19),resulting in modifications to public health policies on a universal scale.SARSCoV-2 vaccine has evolved as the most effective and secure way for protecting healthy individuals against COVID-19.Patients with cancer were excluded from clinical trials due to their increased COVID-19 risk and current immunosuppressing therapy.Safety and effectiveness evidence is insufficient for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in cancer patients.AIM To assess the efficacy and safety of two-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in cancer patients.METHODS A multicenter observational study was performed at ten Chinese hospitals between January 1,2021 and December 31,2021.Each participant in the research received two doses of vaccination.A total of 215 healthy people were screened and 132 eligible patients with cancer were recruited.In order to verify the safety of the second dose of the vaccine,a side-effect report was compiled.Two weeks following the second vaccination dose,subjects underwent an analogous questionnaire survey.Utilizing a magnetic particle-based chemiluminescence immunoassay,serum levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G(IgG)antibodies were measured to determine the effectiveness of vaccination.IgG levels≥10 AU/mL were considered seropositive.RESULTS All the 347 eligible patients completed the follow-up,and anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were detected.Local pain at the injection location was the most common side effect mentioned by all responders,with an increased incidence in cancer patients than the healthy people after the second dose vaccine(17.2%vs 9.1%;P=0.035).There was no significant difference in headache,urticaria,or other adverse reactions between patients with cancer and healthy people.In the group of cancer patients,the seropositivity incidence was 83.3%,while it was 96.3%in the group of healthy people.In the group of cancer patients,the seropositivity incidence and antibody levels were significantly lower(P<0.001).This analysis showed a poorer response rate in patients on active immunosuppressive treatment and elderly cancer patients.CONCLUSION Two-dose Chinese vaccines are effective and safe in cancer patients.However,further research is required on the efficacy in elderly cancer patients and those on active immunosuppressive treatment. 展开更多
关键词 SARS-CoV-2 VACCINE Cancer COVID-19 IMMUNOTHERAPY
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部