This paper was aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of adult male circumcision using the Shang RingTM （SR） with the no-flip technique compared with Dorsal Slit （DS） surgical method, A single-cent...This paper was aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of adult male circumcision using the Shang RingTM （SR） with the no-flip technique compared with Dorsal Slit （DS） surgical method, A single-centered, prospective study was conducted at the West China Hospital, where patients were circumcised using the no-flip SR （n = 408） or the DS （n = 94） procedure. The adverse events （AEs） and satisfaction were recorded for both groups, and ring-removal time and percentage of delayed removals were recorded for the SR group. Finally, complete follow-up data were collected for 76.1% of patients （SR： n = 306; DS： n = 76）. The average ring-removal time for the SR group was 17.62 ± 6.30 days. The operation time （P 〈 0.001）, pain scores during the procedure （P 〈 0.001） and at 24 h postoperatively （P 〈 0.001）, bleeding （P = 0.001）, infection （P = 0.034）, and satisfaction with penile appearance （P 〈 0.001） in the SR group were superior to those in the DS group. After two postoperative weeks, the percentage of patients with edema in the SR group （P = 0.029） was higher but no differences were found at 4 weeks （P = 0, 185） between the two groups. In conclusions, the no-flip SR method was found to be superior to the DS method for its short operation time （〈5 min）, involving less pain, bleeding, infection, and resulting in a satisfactory appearance. However, the time for recovery from edema took longer, and patients may wear device for 2-3 weeks after the procedure.展开更多
文摘This paper was aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of adult male circumcision using the Shang RingTM （SR） with the no-flip technique compared with Dorsal Slit （DS） surgical method, A single-centered, prospective study was conducted at the West China Hospital, where patients were circumcised using the no-flip SR （n = 408） or the DS （n = 94） procedure. The adverse events （AEs） and satisfaction were recorded for both groups, and ring-removal time and percentage of delayed removals were recorded for the SR group. Finally, complete follow-up data were collected for 76.1% of patients （SR： n = 306; DS： n = 76）. The average ring-removal time for the SR group was 17.62 ± 6.30 days. The operation time （P 〈 0.001）, pain scores during the procedure （P 〈 0.001） and at 24 h postoperatively （P 〈 0.001）, bleeding （P = 0.001）, infection （P = 0.034）, and satisfaction with penile appearance （P 〈 0.001） in the SR group were superior to those in the DS group. After two postoperative weeks, the percentage of patients with edema in the SR group （P = 0.029） was higher but no differences were found at 4 weeks （P = 0, 185） between the two groups. In conclusions, the no-flip SR method was found to be superior to the DS method for its short operation time （〈5 min）, involving less pain, bleeding, infection, and resulting in a satisfactory appearance. However, the time for recovery from edema took longer, and patients may wear device for 2-3 weeks after the procedure.
