期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
钛夹预防结直肠息肉切除术后不良事件疗效的Meta分析 被引量:4
1
作者 高利英 刘希樵 黄宣 《世界华人消化杂志》 CAS 2020年第15期710-718,共9页
背景钛夹预防性夹闭创面对结直肠息肉切除术后迟发性出血及穿孔等不良事件的作用尚不明确,目前关于钛夹预防作用的有效性尚未达成共识.目的评价钛夹对预防结直肠息肉内镜下切除术后不良事件的疗效.方法计算机检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane... 背景钛夹预防性夹闭创面对结直肠息肉切除术后迟发性出血及穿孔等不良事件的作用尚不明确,目前关于钛夹预防作用的有效性尚未达成共识.目的评价钛夹对预防结直肠息肉内镜下切除术后不良事件的疗效.方法计算机检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane library、万方中关于结直肠息肉术中是否使用钛夹预防术后不良事件的研究,评价纳入研究质量,并用Revman 5.3软件进行统计学分析.结果共有7项RCT纳入标准,共计3777例患者,1880例患者术中使用钛夹预防性夹闭创面(钛夹组),1897例患者术中不使用钛夹夹闭创面(非钛夹组).Meta分析结果显示:钛夹组较非钛夹组的术后迟发性出血率低,差异具有统计学意义(2.55%vs 4.48%,P=0.01,95%CI:0.40-0.80);而钛夹组较非钛夹组的术后穿孔率无明显差异(0.66%vs 1.04%,P=0.42,95%CI:0.21-1.92).亚组分析显示,钛夹对预防结直肠息肉术后出血的作用,主要体现在大小≥20 mm的息肉上,对<20 mm息肉的预防效果不佳(RR=1.18,95%CI:0.62-2.23,P=0.62;RR=0.47,95%CI:0.29-0.77,P=0.003);钛夹对近端结肠息肉与远端结肠息肉切除术后的预防迟发性出血作用无明显差异(RR=0.57,95%CI:0.18-1.80,P=0.34;RR=0.78,95%CI:0.06-10.33,P=0.85).结论钛夹可预防结直肠息肉切除术后迟发性出血的发生,且主要体现在≥20 mm的病变中,此外钛夹对术后穿孔的预防作用不大. 展开更多
关键词 钛夹 迟发性出血 内镜下黏膜切除术 内镜黏膜下剥离术
下载PDF
Underwater vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection in treatment of colorectal polyps:A meta-analysis 被引量:9
2
作者 Dong-Qiong Ni Yu-Ping Lu +2 位作者 xi-qiao liu Li-Ying Gao Xuan Huang 《World Journal of Clinical Cases》 SCIE 2020年第20期4826-4837,共12页
BACKGROUND Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection(UEMR)of colorectal lesions is emerging as an alternative method to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR);however,it is still controversial whether there is a... BACKGROUND Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection(UEMR)of colorectal lesions is emerging as an alternative method to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR);however,it is still controversial whether there is a difference in the effectiveness between UEMR and EMR.AIM To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of UEMR in the treatment of colorectal polyps.METHODS Clinical studies comparing the effectiveness or safety of UEMR in the treatment of colorectal polyps were searched in medical databases,including Pub Med,Embase,Cochrane Library,CNKI,and Wanfang Data,monographs,theses,and papers presented at conferences.Statistical analyses were performed using Revman 5.3 software.RESULTS Seven non-randomized controlled trials and one randomized controlled trial met the inclusion criteria.In total,1382 patients(1511 polyps)were included in the study,including 722 who received UEMR and 789 who received EMR.In the UEMR and EMR groups,the en bloc resection rates were 85.87%and 73.89%,respectively,with a relative risk(RR)value of 1.14(95%confidence interval[CI]:1.01-1.30;P<0.05).In the sub-group analysis,the en bloc resection rate showed no statistically significant difference between the EMR and UEMR groups for polyps less than 20 mm in diameter.However,a statistically significant difference was found between the EMR and UEMR groups for polyps equal to or greater than 20 mm in diameter.The post-endoscopic resection recurrence rates at 3-6 mo of the UEMR and EMR groups were 3.26%and 15.17%,respectively,with an RR value of 0.27(95%CI:0.09-0.83;P<0.05).The post-endoscopic resection recurrence rates of UEMR and EMR at 12 mo were 6.25%and 14.40%,respectively,with an RR value of 0.43(95%CI:0.20-0.92;P<0.05).Additionally,the incidence of adverse events was 8.17%and 6.21%,respectively,with an RR value of 1.07(95%CI:0.50-2.30;P>0.05).CONCLUSION UEMR is an effective technique for colorectal polyps and appears to have some advantages over EMR,particularly with regard to some treatment outcomes. 展开更多
关键词 Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection Colorectal polyps META-ANALYSIS Endoscopic mucosal resection
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部