Serum cystatin C levels are negatively correlated with post-stroke cognitive dysfunction

Stroke is the leading cause of death and long-term disability worldwide,and cognitive impairment and dementia are major complications of ischemic stroke.Cystatin C (CysC) has been found to be a neuroprotective factor in animal studies.However,the relationship between CysC levels and cognitive dysfunction in previous studies has revealed different results.This prospective observational study investigated the correlation between serum CysC levels and post-stroke cognitive dysfunction at 3 months.Data from 638 patients were obtained from the China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke (CATIS).Cognitive dysfunction was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at 3 months after stroke.According to the MMSE score,308 patients (52.9%) had post-stroke cognitive dysfunction.After adjusting for potential confounding factors,the odds ratio (95% CI) of post-stroke cognitive dysfunction for the highest quartile of serum CysC levels was 0.54 (0.30–0.98),compared with the lowest quartile.The correlation between serum CysC and cognitive dysfunction was modified by renal function status.We observed a negative linear dose-response correlation between CysC and cognitive dysfunction in patients with normal renal function (Plinearity = 0.044),but not in those with abnormal renal function.Elevated serum CysC levels were correlated with a low risk of 3-month cognitive dysfunction in patients with acute ischemic stroke,especially in those with normal renal function.The current results suggest that CysC is a protective factor for post-stroke cognitive dysfunction,and could be used to treat post-stroke cognitive dysfunction.The CATIS study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at Soochow University from China (approval No.2012-02) on December 30,2012,and was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier No.NCT01840072) on April 25,2013.

Pregnancy outcomes of four different cycle protocols for frozen embryo transfer: a large retrospective cohort study

Objective:To evaluate the pregnancy outcomes of the four endometrial preparation protocols for people undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer(FET),including natural cycle(NC),hormone replacement therapy cycle(HRT),gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist artificial cycle(GAC),and ovarian stimulation cycle(OC).Methods:This retrospective cohort study enrolled 10,333 cycles of frozen embryo transfer performed at Xinan Gynecological Hospital in Sichuan,China,from January 2018 to December 2018.The patient's baseline characteristics and pregnancy outcomes were extracted from the medical record system.Pregnancy outcomes were compared among the four groups and multiple logistic regression models were used to adjust for the confounding factors.Results:After adjusting for covariates,multiple logistic regression analysis showed no statistical significance in pregnancy outcomes in the HRT group,GAC group,and OC group compared to the NC group in the entire population.The adjusted odds ratio of live birth was 0.976(95%)confidence interval[Cl](0.837-1.138)for the HRT group,0.959(95%confidence interval 0.797-1.152)for the GAC group,and 0.909(95%confidence interval 0.763-1.083)for the OC group.Conclusions:The natural protocol had comparable pregnancy outcomes compared to the other three endometrial preparation protocols in the overall FET population.More high-quality prospective randomized controlled trials are required to assess the efficacy of the four protocols and explore the optimal one.