Background: Several studies have shown that detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an independent prognostic factor. This study aimed to evaluate the significance of dynamic MRD...Background: Several studies have shown that detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an independent prognostic factor. This study aimed to evaluate the significance of dynamic MRD pretransplantation on outcome of AML patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo?HSCT). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 145 consecutive AML patients undergoing allo?HSCT in complete remission status between June 2013 and June 2016. MRD was determined with multiparameter flow cytometry after the first and second courses of chemotherapy and pre?HSCT. Results: In matched sibling donor transplantation (MSDT) settings, patients with positive MRD had higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) than those without MRD after the first (32.3 ± 9.7% vs. 7.7 ± 3.1%, χ2 = 3.661, P = 0.055) or second course of chemotherapy (57.1 ± 3.6% vs. 12.5 ± 2.7%, χ2 = 8.759, P = 0.003) or pre?HSCT (50.0 ± 9.7% vs. 23.0 ± 3.2%, χ2 = 5.547, P = 0.019). In haploidentical SCT (haplo?SCT) settings, the MRD status at those timepoints had no significant impact on clinical outcomes. However, patients with persistent positive MRD from chemotherapy to pre?HSCT had higher CIR than those without persistent positive MRD both in MSDT and haplo?SCT settings. Patients with persistent positive MRD underwent MSDT had the highest relapse incidence, followed by those with persistent positive MRD underwent haplo?SCT, those without persistent MRD underwent haplo?SCT, and those without persistent MRD underwent MSDT (66.7 ± 9.2% vs. 38.5 ± 6.0% vs. 18.8 ± 8.7% vs. 12.0 ± 1.0%, χ2 = 20.763, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that persistent positive MRD before transplantation was associated with higher CIR (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.200–2.382, P = 0.003), worse leukemia?free survival (HR = 1.812, 95% CI: 1.168–2.812, P = 0.008), and overall survival (HR = 2.354, 95% CI: 1.528–3.627, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Our results suggest that persistent positive MRD before transplantation, rather than positive MRD at single timepoint, could predict poor outcome both in MSDT and haplo?SCT settings.展开更多
Dear Editor,NK cells are the first cells reconstituted after Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation(allo-HSCT)(Raulet and Vance,2006;Zhao et al.,2007).The roles of alloreactive NK cells are conflicting in...Dear Editor,NK cells are the first cells reconstituted after Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation(allo-HSCT)(Raulet and Vance,2006;Zhao et al.,2007).The roles of alloreactive NK cells are conflicting in allogeneic transplantation,mainly because several factors influence the reconstitution of NK cells,including different transplantation conditioning regimens,disease backgrounds and graft-versus-host disease(GVHD)prophylaxis(Zhao et al.,2011).展开更多
文摘Background: Several studies have shown that detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an independent prognostic factor. This study aimed to evaluate the significance of dynamic MRD pretransplantation on outcome of AML patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo?HSCT). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 145 consecutive AML patients undergoing allo?HSCT in complete remission status between June 2013 and June 2016. MRD was determined with multiparameter flow cytometry after the first and second courses of chemotherapy and pre?HSCT. Results: In matched sibling donor transplantation (MSDT) settings, patients with positive MRD had higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) than those without MRD after the first (32.3 ± 9.7% vs. 7.7 ± 3.1%, χ2 = 3.661, P = 0.055) or second course of chemotherapy (57.1 ± 3.6% vs. 12.5 ± 2.7%, χ2 = 8.759, P = 0.003) or pre?HSCT (50.0 ± 9.7% vs. 23.0 ± 3.2%, χ2 = 5.547, P = 0.019). In haploidentical SCT (haplo?SCT) settings, the MRD status at those timepoints had no significant impact on clinical outcomes. However, patients with persistent positive MRD from chemotherapy to pre?HSCT had higher CIR than those without persistent positive MRD both in MSDT and haplo?SCT settings. Patients with persistent positive MRD underwent MSDT had the highest relapse incidence, followed by those with persistent positive MRD underwent haplo?SCT, those without persistent MRD underwent haplo?SCT, and those without persistent MRD underwent MSDT (66.7 ± 9.2% vs. 38.5 ± 6.0% vs. 18.8 ± 8.7% vs. 12.0 ± 1.0%, χ2 = 20.763, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that persistent positive MRD before transplantation was associated with higher CIR (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.200–2.382, P = 0.003), worse leukemia?free survival (HR = 1.812, 95% CI: 1.168–2.812, P = 0.008), and overall survival (HR = 2.354, 95% CI: 1.528–3.627, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Our results suggest that persistent positive MRD before transplantation, rather than positive MRD at single timepoint, could predict poor outcome both in MSDT and haplo?SCT settings.
基金supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China(81670166,81530046)Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China(81621001)+4 种基金the Beijing Talents Fund(2015000021223ZK26)the Beijing Municipal Science&Technology Commission(Z171100001017098)the Project of Health Collaborative Innovation of Guangzhou City(201704020214)China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2018M631280)the Scientific Research Foundation for Capital Medicine Development(2018-2-4084,2016-1-4082)。
文摘Dear Editor,NK cells are the first cells reconstituted after Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation(allo-HSCT)(Raulet and Vance,2006;Zhao et al.,2007).The roles of alloreactive NK cells are conflicting in allogeneic transplantation,mainly because several factors influence the reconstitution of NK cells,including different transplantation conditioning regimens,disease backgrounds and graft-versus-host disease(GVHD)prophylaxis(Zhao et al.,2011).