In-situ dating of the zircons, titanites, and apatites in the rock fragments of approximately 1 cm2in size from the Acasta Gneiss Complex was performed using secondary ion mass spectrometry or laser ablation inductive...In-situ dating of the zircons, titanites, and apatites in the rock fragments of approximately 1 cm2in size from the Acasta Gneiss Complex was performed using secondary ion mass spectrometry or laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry to provide constraints on the thermal history of the Acasta Gneiss Complex. The zircons in these rock fragments typically exhibit multiple age populations, reflecting the presence of inherited zircons or the post-crystallization process of zircon overgrowth. Combined with previous studies, our zircon dating results reveal multiple magmatic events that occurred in the Acasta Gneiss Complex, specifically at >3.96, ~3.72, and ~3.57 Ga, respectively. A titanite Pb-Pb isochron age of2911±22 Ma(95% confidence level, MSWD=1.5) for sample AY199 is identified, consistent with the timing of the latest Archean magmatism in the Acasta Gneiss Complex. The titanite U-Pb ages for samples AC478 and AY066 are 1932±270 Ma(95% confidence level, MSWD=2.3) and 1813±45 Ma(95% confidence level, MSWD=2.3), respectively. The apatites in sample P090803-C exhibit a Pb-Pb isochron age of 1833±26 Ma(95% confidence level, MSWD=1.4). The apatite U-Pb ages for samples AC478, AY199, and AY066 are 1850±20 Ma(95% confidence level, MSWD=1.3), 1827±100 Ma(95% confidence level, MSWD=6.3), and 1807±58 Ma(95% confidence level, MSWD=3.9), respectively. Titanites in samples AC478 and AY066, as well as the apatites in all four investigated samples, show a uniform age(Pb-Pb or U-Pb age) of ~1.9–1.8 Ga,indicating U-Pb system reset in these minerals due to the Wopmay orogeny and documenting that the peak temperature condition associated with the Wopmay orogeny exceeded the apatite U-Pb closure temperature and approached or exceeded that of titanite.展开更多
Secondary ion mass spectrometry(SIMS) zircon U-Pb dating has been widely used to confine the absolute ages of the magmatic or metamorphic events and to distinguish multiple events.Here,a data set consisting of the zir...Secondary ion mass spectrometry(SIMS) zircon U-Pb dating has been widely used to confine the absolute ages of the magmatic or metamorphic events and to distinguish multiple events.Here,a data set consisting of the zircon standards dating data(~15 000 Ple?ovice and ~8 000 Qinghu items) accumulated for more than 8 years using the CAMECA IMS 1280 HR of the Institute of Geology and Geophysics,Chinese Academy of Sciences(IGGCAS) is compiled to evaluate the long-term external reproducibility.With Ple?ovice zircon as the calibration standard and Qinghu zircon as an unknown sample,the analytical uncertainties for single-spot(n = 7 723) and session analyses(n = 691,with more than 7 single spot analyses in one session) are 2.6% and 0.9%(2 RSD,relative standard deviation),respectively.It means that single-spot U-Pb dating for a standard-level zircon sample could vary 5.2% at 95% confidence level,while the average value(n > 7) for each session may vary 1.8%.Thus,these values should be considered as the minimum uncertainty when comparing single spot and individual session analysis results for multiple dating works on a certain geological event.展开更多
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grants Nos.42103011,4207303442288201)the B-type Strategic Priority Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(Grants No.XDB41000000)。
文摘In-situ dating of the zircons, titanites, and apatites in the rock fragments of approximately 1 cm2in size from the Acasta Gneiss Complex was performed using secondary ion mass spectrometry or laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry to provide constraints on the thermal history of the Acasta Gneiss Complex. The zircons in these rock fragments typically exhibit multiple age populations, reflecting the presence of inherited zircons or the post-crystallization process of zircon overgrowth. Combined with previous studies, our zircon dating results reveal multiple magmatic events that occurred in the Acasta Gneiss Complex, specifically at >3.96, ~3.72, and ~3.57 Ga, respectively. A titanite Pb-Pb isochron age of2911±22 Ma(95% confidence level, MSWD=1.5) for sample AY199 is identified, consistent with the timing of the latest Archean magmatism in the Acasta Gneiss Complex. The titanite U-Pb ages for samples AC478 and AY066 are 1932±270 Ma(95% confidence level, MSWD=2.3) and 1813±45 Ma(95% confidence level, MSWD=2.3), respectively. The apatites in sample P090803-C exhibit a Pb-Pb isochron age of 1833±26 Ma(95% confidence level, MSWD=1.4). The apatite U-Pb ages for samples AC478, AY199, and AY066 are 1850±20 Ma(95% confidence level, MSWD=1.3), 1827±100 Ma(95% confidence level, MSWD=6.3), and 1807±58 Ma(95% confidence level, MSWD=3.9), respectively. Titanites in samples AC478 and AY066, as well as the apatites in all four investigated samples, show a uniform age(Pb-Pb or U-Pb age) of ~1.9–1.8 Ga,indicating U-Pb system reset in these minerals due to the Wopmay orogeny and documenting that the peak temperature condition associated with the Wopmay orogeny exceeded the apatite U-Pb closure temperature and approached or exceeded that of titanite.
基金supported by the National Key R&D Program of China(No.2018YFA0702600)the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos.41773044,41773047)。
文摘Secondary ion mass spectrometry(SIMS) zircon U-Pb dating has been widely used to confine the absolute ages of the magmatic or metamorphic events and to distinguish multiple events.Here,a data set consisting of the zircon standards dating data(~15 000 Ple?ovice and ~8 000 Qinghu items) accumulated for more than 8 years using the CAMECA IMS 1280 HR of the Institute of Geology and Geophysics,Chinese Academy of Sciences(IGGCAS) is compiled to evaluate the long-term external reproducibility.With Ple?ovice zircon as the calibration standard and Qinghu zircon as an unknown sample,the analytical uncertainties for single-spot(n = 7 723) and session analyses(n = 691,with more than 7 single spot analyses in one session) are 2.6% and 0.9%(2 RSD,relative standard deviation),respectively.It means that single-spot U-Pb dating for a standard-level zircon sample could vary 5.2% at 95% confidence level,while the average value(n > 7) for each session may vary 1.8%.Thus,these values should be considered as the minimum uncertainty when comparing single spot and individual session analysis results for multiple dating works on a certain geological event.