Background：The interpretation of spirometry varies on different reference values.Older people are usually underrepresented in published predictive values.This study aimed at developing spirometric reference equations...Background：The interpretation of spirometry varies on different reference values.Older people are usually underrepresented in published predictive values.This study aimed at developing spirometric reference equations for elderly Chinese in Jinan aged 60-84 years and to compare them to previous equations.Methods：The project covered all of Jinan city,and the recruitment period lasted 9 months from January 1,2017 to September 30,2017,434 healthy people aged 60-84 years who had never smoked （226 females and 208 males） were recruited to undergo spirometry.Vital capacity （VC）,forced VC （FVC）,forced expiratory volume in 1 s （FEV1）,FEV1/FVC,FEV1/VC,FEV6,peak expiratory flow,and forced expiratory flow at 25%,50%,75%,and 25-75% of FVC exhaled （FEF25%,FEF50%,FEF75%,and FEF25-75%） were analyzed.Reference equations for mean and the lower limit of normal （LLN） were derived using the lambda-mu-sigma method.Comparisons between new and previous equations were performed by paired t-test.Results：New reference equations were developed from the sample.The LLN of FEV1/FVC,FEF25-75% computed using the 2012-Global Lung Function Initiative （GLI） and 2006-Hong Kong equations were both lower than the new equations.The biggest degree of difference for FEV1/FVC was 19% （70.46% vs.59.29%,t =33.954,P 〈 0.01） and for maximal midexpiratory flow （MMEF,equals to FEF25-75%） was 22% （0.82 vs.0.67,t =21.303,P 〈 0.01）.The 1990-North China and 2009-North China equations predicted higher mean values of FEV1/FVC and FEF25-75% than the present model.The biggest degrees of difference were-4% （78.31% vs.81.27%,t =-85.359,P 〈 0.01）and-60% （2.11 vs.4.68,t =-170.287,P 〈 0.01）,respectively.Conclusions：The newly developed spirometric reference equations are applicable to elderly Chinese in Jinan.The 2012-GLI and 2006-Hong Kong equations may lead to missed diagnoses of obstructive ventilatory defects and the small airway dysfunction,while traditional linear equations for all ages may lead to overdiagnosis.展开更多
基金This study was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China （No. 81370148）.
文摘Background：The interpretation of spirometry varies on different reference values.Older people are usually underrepresented in published predictive values.This study aimed at developing spirometric reference equations for elderly Chinese in Jinan aged 60-84 years and to compare them to previous equations.Methods：The project covered all of Jinan city,and the recruitment period lasted 9 months from January 1,2017 to September 30,2017,434 healthy people aged 60-84 years who had never smoked （226 females and 208 males） were recruited to undergo spirometry.Vital capacity （VC）,forced VC （FVC）,forced expiratory volume in 1 s （FEV1）,FEV1/FVC,FEV1/VC,FEV6,peak expiratory flow,and forced expiratory flow at 25%,50%,75%,and 25-75% of FVC exhaled （FEF25%,FEF50%,FEF75%,and FEF25-75%） were analyzed.Reference equations for mean and the lower limit of normal （LLN） were derived using the lambda-mu-sigma method.Comparisons between new and previous equations were performed by paired t-test.Results：New reference equations were developed from the sample.The LLN of FEV1/FVC,FEF25-75% computed using the 2012-Global Lung Function Initiative （GLI） and 2006-Hong Kong equations were both lower than the new equations.The biggest degree of difference for FEV1/FVC was 19% （70.46% vs.59.29%,t =33.954,P 〈 0.01） and for maximal midexpiratory flow （MMEF,equals to FEF25-75%） was 22% （0.82 vs.0.67,t =21.303,P 〈 0.01）.The 1990-North China and 2009-North China equations predicted higher mean values of FEV1/FVC and FEF25-75% than the present model.The biggest degrees of difference were-4% （78.31% vs.81.27%,t =-85.359,P 〈 0.01）and-60% （2.11 vs.4.68,t =-170.287,P 〈 0.01）,respectively.Conclusions：The newly developed spirometric reference equations are applicable to elderly Chinese in Jinan.The 2012-GLI and 2006-Hong Kong equations may lead to missed diagnoses of obstructive ventilatory defects and the small airway dysfunction,while traditional linear equations for all ages may lead to overdiagnosis.
