Clinical value of the Toronto inflammatory bowel disease global endoscopic reporting score in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND Endoscopic evaluation in diagnosing and managing ulcerative colitis(UC)is becoming increasingly important.Several endoscopic scoring systems have been established,including the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity(UCEIS)score and Mayo Endoscopic Subscore(MES).Furthermore,the Toronto Inflammatory Bowel Disease Global Endoscopic Reporting(TIGER)score for UC has recently been proposed;however,its clinical value remains unclear.AIM To investigate the clinical value of the TIGER score in UC by comparing it with the UCEIS score and MES.METHODS This retrospective study included 166 patients with UC who underwent total colonoscopy between January 2017 and March 2023 at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University(Qingdao,China).We retrospectively analysed endoscopic scores,laboratory and clinical data,treatment,and readmissions within 1 year.Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient,receiver operating characteristic curve,and univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows,version 26.0(IBM Corp.,Armonk,NY,United States)and GraphPad Prism version 9.0.0 for Windows(GraphPad Software,Boston,Massachusetts,United States).RESULTS The TIGER score significantly correlated with the UCEIS score and MES(r=0.721,0.626,both P<0.001),showed good differentiating values for clinical severity among mild,moderate,and severe UC[8(4-112.75)vs 210(109–219)vs 328(219–426),all P<0.001],and exhibited predictive value in diagnosing patients with severe UC[area under the curve(AUC)=0.897,P<0.001].Additionally,the TIGER(r=0.639,0,551,0.488,0.376,all P<0.001)and UCEIS scores(r=0.622,0,540,0.494,and 0.375,all P<0.001)showed stronger correlations with laboratory and clinical parameters,including C-reactive protein,erythrocyte sedimentation rate,length of hospitalisation,and hospitalisation costs,than MES(r=0.509,0,351,0.339,and 0.270,all P<0.001).The TIGER score showed the best predictability for patients'recent advanced treatment,including systemic corticosteroids,biologics,or immunomodulators(AUC=0.848,P<0.001)and 1-year readmission(AUC=0.700,P<0.001)compared with the UCEIS score(AUC=0.762,P<0.001;0.627,P<0.05)and MES(AUC=0.684,P<0.001;0.578,P=0.132).Furthermore,a TIGER score of≥317 was identified as an independent risk factor for advanced UC treatment(P=0.011).CONCLUSION The TIGER score may be superior to the UCIES score and MES in improving the accuracy of clinical disease severity assessment,guiding therapeutic decision-making,and predicting short-term prognosis.

Value of fasting plasma glucose to screen gestational diabetes mellitus before the 24th gestational week in women with different pre-pregnancy body mass index

Background:Gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM)is usually diagnosed between 24th and 28th gestational week using the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test(OGTT).It is difficult to predict GDM before 24th gestational week because fast plasma glucose(FPG)decreases as the gestational age increases.It is controversial that if FPG≥5.1 mmol/L before 24th gestational week should be intervened or not.The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of FPG to screen GDM before 24th gestational week in women with different pre-pregnancy body mass index(BMI).Methods:This was a multi-region retrospective cohort study in China.Women who had a singleton live birth between June 20,2013 and November 30,2014,resided in Beijing,Guangzhou and Chengdu,and received prenatal care in 21 selected hospitals,were included in this study.Pre-pregnancy BMI,FPG before the 24th gestational week,and one-step GDM screening with 75 g-OGTT at the 24th to 28th gestational weeks were extracted from medical charts and analyzed.The pregnant women were classified into four groups based on pre-pregnancy BMI:Group A(underweight,BMI<18.5 kg/m^2),Group B(normal,BMI 18.5-23.9 kg/m^2),Group C(overweight,BMI 24.0-27.9 kg/m^2)and Group D(obesity,BMI≥28.0 kg/m^2).The trend of FPG before 24th week of gestation was described,and the sensitivity and specificity of using FPG before the 24th gestational week to diagnose GDM among different pre-pregnancy BMI groups were reported.Differences in the means between groups were evaluated using independent sample t-test and analysis of variance.Pearson Chi-square test was used for categorical variables.Results:The prevalence of GDM was 20.0%(6806/34,087)in the study population.FPG decreased gradually as the gestational age increased in all pre-pregnancy BMI groups until the 19th gestational week.FPG was higher in women with higher pre-pregnancy BMI.FPG before the 24th gestational week and pre-pregnancy BMI could be used to predict GDM.The incidence of GDM in women with FPG≥5.10 mmol/L in the 19th to 24th gestational weeks and pre-pregnancy overweight or obesity was significantly higher than that in women with FPG≥5.10 mmol/L and pre-pregnancy BMI<24.0 kg/m^2(78.5%[62/79]vs.52.9%[64/121],χ^2=13.425,P<0.001).Conclusions:FPG decreased gradually as the gestational age increased in all pre-pregnancy BMI groups until the 19th gestational week.Pre-pregnancy overweight or obesity was associated with an increased FPG value before the 24th gestational week.FPG≥5.10 mmol/L between 19 and 24 gestational weeks should be treated as GDM in women with pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity.

基因多态性与β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏的关联性分析（英文）

目的:探讨IL-10、IL-13、IL-4Rα、FcεRIβ、IFNGR2、CYP3A4基因多态性与中国西北地区汉族人群β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏易感性的关联性。创新点:首次在甘肃地区汉族人群中探讨10个单核苷酸多态性位点与β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏易感性的关联性,为该地区人群β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏患者提供了基因组学水平的诊断数据。方法:以β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏者为研究对象进行病例对照研究,采用Sequenom Mass ARRAY分子量阵列技术平台定制单核苷酸多态性(SNP)芯片检测10个单核苷酸多态性与甘肃地区汉族人群β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏易感性的关联性。应用SHEsis软件完成IL-10及IL-13的连锁不平衡分析及单倍型构建。结论:CYP3A4 rs2242480基因多态性与男性患者β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏有显著的相关性(P=0.022;OR=0.167,95%CI:0.032–0.867)。IL-13的CCT及CAC单倍型与中国西北地区汉族β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏的相关性有待进一步研究。