Growth differentiation factor-15 is a prognostic marker in patients with intermediate coronary artery disease

Background Growth differentiation factor-15(GDF-15)is involved in multiple processes that are associated with coronary artery disease(CAD).However,little is known about the association between GDF-15 and the future ischemic events in patients with intermediate CAD.This study was conducted to investigate whether plasma GDF-15 constituted risk biomarkers for future cardiovascular events in patients with intermediate CAD.Methods A prospective study was performed based on 541 patients with intermediate CAD(20%–70%).GDF-15 of each patient was determined in a blinded manner.The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac event(MACE),which was defined as a composite of all-cause death,nonfatal myocardial infarction,revascularization and readmission due to angina pectoris.Results After a median follow-up of 64 months,504 patients(93.2%)completed the follow-up.Overall,the combined endpoint of MACE appeared in 134 patients(26.6%)in the overall population:26 patients died,11 patients suffered a nonfatal myocardial infarction,51 patients underwent revascularization,and 46 patients were readmitted for angina pectoris.The plasma levels of GDF-15(median:1172.02 vs.965.25 pg/m L,P=0.014)were higher in patients with ischemic events than those without events.After adjusting for traditional risk factors,higher GDF-15 levels were significantly associated with higher incidence of the composite endpoint of MACE(HR=1.244,95%CI:1.048–1.478,Quartile 4 vs.Quartile 1,P=0.013).Conclusions The higher level of GDF-15 was an independent predictor of long-term adverse cardiovascular events in patients with intermediate CAD.

Platelet RNA enables accurate detection of ovarian cancer:an intercontinental,biomarker identification study

Platelets are reprogrammed by cancer via a process called education,which favors cancer development.The transcriptional profile of tumor-educated platelets(TEPs)is skewed and therefore practicable for cancer detection.This intercontinental,hospital-based,diagnostic study included 761 treatment-naive inpatients with histologically confirmed adnexal masses and 167 healthy controls from nine medical centers(China,n=3;Netherlands,n=5;Poland,n=1)between September 2016 and May 2019.The main outcomes were the performance of TEPs and their combination with CA125 in two Chinese(VC1 and VC2)and the European(VC3)validation cohorts collectively and independently.Exploratory outcome was the value of TEPs in public pan-cancer platelet transcriptome datasets.The AUCs for TEPs in the combined validation cohort,VC1,VC2,and VC3 were 0.918(95%CI 0.889-0.948),0.923(0.855-0.990),0.918(0.872-0.963),and 0.887(0.813-0.960),respectively.Combination of TEPs and CA125 demonstrated an AUC of 0.922(0.889-0.955)in the combined validation cohort;0.955(0.912-0.997)in VC1;0.939(0.901-0.977)in VC2;0.917(0.824-1.000)in VC3.For subgroup analysis,TEPs exhibited an AUC of o.858,0.859,and 0.920 to detect early-stage,borderline,non-epithelial diseases and 0.899 to discriminate ovarian cancer from endometriosis.TEPs had robustness,compatibility,and universality for preop.erative diagnosis of ovarian cancer since it withstood validations in populations of different ethnicities,heterogeneous histoiogical subtypes,and early-stage ovarian cancer.However,these observations warrant prospective validations in a larger population beforeclinicalutilities.