Existing theory and models suggest that a Type I （merger） GRB should have a larger jet beaming angle than a Type II （collapsar） GRB, but so far no statistical evidence is available to support this suggestion. In t...Existing theory and models suggest that a Type I （merger） GRB should have a larger jet beaming angle than a Type II （collapsar） GRB, but so far no statistical evidence is available to support this suggestion. In this paper, we obtain a sample of 37 beaming angles and calculate the probability that this is true. A correction is also devised to account for the scarcity of Type I GRBs in our sample. The probability is calculated to be 83% without the correction and 71% with it.展开更多
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 10873009)the National Basic Research Program of China (973 program, No. 2007CB815404)
文摘Existing theory and models suggest that a Type I （merger） GRB should have a larger jet beaming angle than a Type II （collapsar） GRB, but so far no statistical evidence is available to support this suggestion. In this paper, we obtain a sample of 37 beaming angles and calculate the probability that this is true. A correction is also devised to account for the scarcity of Type I GRBs in our sample. The probability is calculated to be 83% without the correction and 71% with it.
