Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of atrial flutter(AFL) after pulmonary vein antrum isolation(PVAI) in patients with previous cardiac surgery(PCS) in comparison to patients without PCS and...Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of atrial flutter(AFL) after pulmonary vein antrum isolation(PVAI) in patients with previous cardiac surgery(PCS) in comparison to patients without PCS and to assess the need for AFL ablation in both groups. Background: Atrial fibrillation(AF) and AFL often co- exist. Pulmonary vein antrum isolation may be sufficient to control both arrhythmias. However, in patients with PCS, atrial incisions, cannulations, and scar areas may cause AFL recurrence despite elimination of pulmonary vein triggers. Methods: Data from 1,345 patients who had PVAI were analyzed. Patients with a history of AFL ablation and patients who had concomitant AFL ablation during PVAI were excluded from analysis. Sixty- three patients constituted the PCS group(Group 1, age 57± 13 years, 12 female) and 1,062 patients constituted the non- PCS group(Group 2, age 55± 12 years, 212 female). Patients in Group 1 had larger left atria, higher incidence of AFL pre- PVAI, and lower ejection fraction. Results: There was no significant difference in post- PVAI AF recurrence between Groups 1 and 2, but AFL incidence after PVAI was higher in Group 1(33% vs. 4% , p< 0.0001). Ablation of AFL in Group 1 patients resulted in an 86% acute success rate and 11% recurrence over a mean follow- up of 357± 201 days. Conclusions: In patients with PCS, post- PVAI AF recurrence is similar to patients without PCS. However, history of PCS is associated with a higher recurrence of AFL after PVAI. In a significant number of patients with PCS, AFL ablation is required to achieve a cure.展开更多
文摘Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of atrial flutter(AFL) after pulmonary vein antrum isolation(PVAI) in patients with previous cardiac surgery(PCS) in comparison to patients without PCS and to assess the need for AFL ablation in both groups. Background: Atrial fibrillation(AF) and AFL often co- exist. Pulmonary vein antrum isolation may be sufficient to control both arrhythmias. However, in patients with PCS, atrial incisions, cannulations, and scar areas may cause AFL recurrence despite elimination of pulmonary vein triggers. Methods: Data from 1,345 patients who had PVAI were analyzed. Patients with a history of AFL ablation and patients who had concomitant AFL ablation during PVAI were excluded from analysis. Sixty- three patients constituted the PCS group(Group 1, age 57± 13 years, 12 female) and 1,062 patients constituted the non- PCS group(Group 2, age 55± 12 years, 212 female). Patients in Group 1 had larger left atria, higher incidence of AFL pre- PVAI, and lower ejection fraction. Results: There was no significant difference in post- PVAI AF recurrence between Groups 1 and 2, but AFL incidence after PVAI was higher in Group 1(33% vs. 4% , p< 0.0001). Ablation of AFL in Group 1 patients resulted in an 86% acute success rate and 11% recurrence over a mean follow- up of 357± 201 days. Conclusions: In patients with PCS, post- PVAI AF recurrence is similar to patients without PCS. However, history of PCS is associated with a higher recurrence of AFL after PVAI. In a significant number of patients with PCS, AFL ablation is required to achieve a cure.
