针对传统风电功率预测仅考虑气象因素,且无法计及风电机组真实出力状态导致预测精度较差问题,本文提出一种计及风机状态的超短期风电功率动态预测方法。首先,为能够精确评估风机状态,将BP(error back propagation, BP)算法引入层次分析...针对传统风电功率预测仅考虑气象因素,且无法计及风电机组真实出力状态导致预测精度较差问题,本文提出一种计及风机状态的超短期风电功率动态预测方法。首先,为能够精确评估风机状态,将BP(error back propagation, BP)算法引入层次分析法(analytic hierarchy process, AHP)的评估结构中,构建BP-AHP风机状态评估模型,实现单台风机状态评估;然后,综合考虑地形及机组排布等因素,将风电场所有风机的状态取均值作为风电场状态,利用皮尔逊相关系数衡量所评估状态与功率之间的相关性以验证评估模型合理性,并采用XGBoost构建计及风机状态的动态预测模型;最后,以陕西地区某风电场实测数据进行算例分析,验证了所提方法的可行性及有效性。展开更多
Objective To observe the value of artificial intelligence(AI)models based on non-contrast chest CT for measuring bone mineral density(BMD).Methods Totally 380 subjects who underwent both non-contrast chest CT and quan...Objective To observe the value of artificial intelligence(AI)models based on non-contrast chest CT for measuring bone mineral density(BMD).Methods Totally 380 subjects who underwent both non-contrast chest CT and quantitative CT(QCT)BMD examination were retrospectively enrolled and divided into training set(n=304)and test set(n=76)at a ratio of 8∶2.The mean BMD of L1—L3 vertebrae were measured based on QCT.Spongy bones of T5—T10 vertebrae were segmented as ROI,radiomics(Rad)features were extracted,and machine learning(ML),Rad and deep learning(DL)models were constructed for classification of osteoporosis(OP)and evaluating BMD,respectively.Receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn,and area under the curves(AUC)were calculated to evaluate the efficacy of each model for classification of OP.Bland-Altman analysis and Pearson correlation analysis were performed to explore the consistency and correlation of each model with QCT for measuring BMD.Results Among ML and Rad models,ML Bagging-OP and Rad Bagging-OP had the best performances for classification of OP.In test set,AUC of ML Bagging-OP,Rad Bagging-OP and DL OP for classification of OP was 0.943,0.944 and 0.947,respectively,with no significant difference(all P>0.05).BMD obtained with all the above models had good consistency with those measured with QCT(most of the differences were within the range of Ax-G±1.96 s),which were highly positively correlated(r=0.910—0.974,all P<0.001).Conclusion AI models based on non-contrast chest CT had high efficacy for classification of OP,and good consistency of BMD measurements were found between AI models and QCT.展开更多
文摘Objective To observe the value of artificial intelligence(AI)models based on non-contrast chest CT for measuring bone mineral density(BMD).Methods Totally 380 subjects who underwent both non-contrast chest CT and quantitative CT(QCT)BMD examination were retrospectively enrolled and divided into training set(n=304)and test set(n=76)at a ratio of 8∶2.The mean BMD of L1—L3 vertebrae were measured based on QCT.Spongy bones of T5—T10 vertebrae were segmented as ROI,radiomics(Rad)features were extracted,and machine learning(ML),Rad and deep learning(DL)models were constructed for classification of osteoporosis(OP)and evaluating BMD,respectively.Receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn,and area under the curves(AUC)were calculated to evaluate the efficacy of each model for classification of OP.Bland-Altman analysis and Pearson correlation analysis were performed to explore the consistency and correlation of each model with QCT for measuring BMD.Results Among ML and Rad models,ML Bagging-OP and Rad Bagging-OP had the best performances for classification of OP.In test set,AUC of ML Bagging-OP,Rad Bagging-OP and DL OP for classification of OP was 0.943,0.944 and 0.947,respectively,with no significant difference(all P>0.05).BMD obtained with all the above models had good consistency with those measured with QCT(most of the differences were within the range of Ax-G±1.96 s),which were highly positively correlated(r=0.910—0.974,all P<0.001).Conclusion AI models based on non-contrast chest CT had high efficacy for classification of OP,and good consistency of BMD measurements were found between AI models and QCT.
文摘由于桥梁裂缝图像具有分布不规则、缝宽较小、背景像素比例较高等特性,为提高其检测精度和速度,提出了一种改进的YOLOv4算法,优化原主干网络CSPDarkNet53为EfficientNet B7网络以增强特征学习能力,并使用深度可分离卷积代替标准卷积,在提升模型运行效率的同时,也提高了其检测精度和准确率.并通过平移、旋转等数据增强方法将数据集正负样本扩增至6371张,增强了网络的拟合效果和泛化能力.实验结果表明:YOLOv4-EfficientNet B7的均值平均精度(Mean Average Precision,mAP)为80.11%,比YOLOv4的高出3.85%;检测精确率(precision)为80.13%,召回率(recall)由74.34%提升至78.63%,F1值(F1-score)高达80.61%,提高了2.94%;相较于原YOLOv4算法,检测精确率提高了1.86%,召回率增长了4.29%;与其他主流的裂缝检测算法相比,本算法在mAP和召回率上都有了显著提升,实现了精确检测桥梁裂缝的目的.
