Gene set scoring(GSS)has been routinely conducted for gene expression analysis of bulk or single-cell RNA sequencing(RNA-seq)data,which helps to decipher single-cell heterogeneity and cell type-specific variability by...Gene set scoring(GSS)has been routinely conducted for gene expression analysis of bulk or single-cell RNA sequencing(RNA-seq)data,which helps to decipher single-cell heterogeneity and cell type-specific variability by incorporating prior knowledge from functional gene sets.Single-cell assay for transposase accessible chromatin using sequencing(scATAC-seq)is a powerful technique for interrogating single-cell chromatin-based gene regulation,and genes or gene sets with dynamic regulatory potentials can be regarded as cell type-specific markers as if in single-cell RNA-seq(scRNA-seq).However,there are few GSS tools specifically designed for scATAC-seq,and the applicability and performance of RNA-seq GSS tools on scATAC-seq data remain to be investigated.Here,we systematically benchmarked ten GSS tools,including four bulk RNA-seq tools,five scRNA-seq tools,and one scATAC-seq method.First,using matched scATAC-seq and scRNA-seq datasets,we found that the performance of GSS tools on scATAC-seq data was comparable to that on scRNA-seq,suggesting their applicability to scATAC-seq.Then,the performance of different GSS tools was extensively evaluated using up to ten scATAC-seq datasets.Moreover,we evaluated the impact of gene activity conversion,dropout imputation,and gene set collections on the results of GSS.Results show that dropout imputation can significantly promote the performance of almost all GSS tools,while the impact of gene activity conversion methods or gene set collections on GSS performance is more dependent on GSS tools or datasets.Finally,we provided practical guidelines for choosing appropriate preprocessing methods and GSS tools in different application scenarios.展开更多
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.T2222007 to Xiaohui Wu).
文摘Gene set scoring(GSS)has been routinely conducted for gene expression analysis of bulk or single-cell RNA sequencing(RNA-seq)data,which helps to decipher single-cell heterogeneity and cell type-specific variability by incorporating prior knowledge from functional gene sets.Single-cell assay for transposase accessible chromatin using sequencing(scATAC-seq)is a powerful technique for interrogating single-cell chromatin-based gene regulation,and genes or gene sets with dynamic regulatory potentials can be regarded as cell type-specific markers as if in single-cell RNA-seq(scRNA-seq).However,there are few GSS tools specifically designed for scATAC-seq,and the applicability and performance of RNA-seq GSS tools on scATAC-seq data remain to be investigated.Here,we systematically benchmarked ten GSS tools,including four bulk RNA-seq tools,five scRNA-seq tools,and one scATAC-seq method.First,using matched scATAC-seq and scRNA-seq datasets,we found that the performance of GSS tools on scATAC-seq data was comparable to that on scRNA-seq,suggesting their applicability to scATAC-seq.Then,the performance of different GSS tools was extensively evaluated using up to ten scATAC-seq datasets.Moreover,we evaluated the impact of gene activity conversion,dropout imputation,and gene set collections on the results of GSS.Results show that dropout imputation can significantly promote the performance of almost all GSS tools,while the impact of gene activity conversion methods or gene set collections on GSS performance is more dependent on GSS tools or datasets.Finally,we provided practical guidelines for choosing appropriate preprocessing methods and GSS tools in different application scenarios.