<strong>Purpose:</strong> Several studies have shown that fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin (SOX) is non-inferior to fluoropyrimidine plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. ...<strong>Purpose:</strong> Several studies have shown that fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin (SOX) is non-inferior to fluoropyrimidine plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. We investigated retrospectively the choice of second-line regimen, along with the proportion and feasibility of paclitaxel-containing regimen, in the subsequent treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with SOX as first-line chemotherapy. <strong>Materials and Methods:</strong> We retrospectively analyzed the impact of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy on both the choice of subsequent regimens and feasibility of subsequent chemotherapy with paclitaxel, focusing on patients with advanced gastric cancer who received S-1 plus oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy.<strong> Results:</strong> Twenty-seven from a total of 31 patients enrolled into the phase 2 and phase 3 study assessing S-1 plus oxaliplatin were analyzed (4 patients were deemed ineligible). Among 24 patients that had received second-line treatment, paclitaxel was not selected in 2 patients due to oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy. Paclitaxel was selected as second-line chemotherapy in 16 patients, as third-line chemotherapy in 6 patients and fourth-line chemotherapy in one patient. Severity of sensory neuropathy was grade 0/1/2/3 in 11/10/2/0 patients, respectively, immediately before treatment with paclitaxel, while the worst toxicity profile during paclitaxel treatment was grade 0/1/2/3 in 7/13/1/2 patients, respectively. Although there were no patients requiring dose reductions of paclitaxel due to neuropathy, 2 patients discontinued paclitaxel use due to grade 3 sensory neuropathy after 4 or 8 administrations of paclitaxel. <strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy during first-line chemotherapy may affect the choice and feasibility of subsequent chemotherapy with paclitaxel in advanced gastric cancer patients.展开更多
Skin toxicity is a common symptom of anti-epidermal rowth factor receptor(EGFR) antibody treatment and is also a predictive marker of its efficacy in colorectal cancer patients. However, severe skin disorders induced ...Skin toxicity is a common symptom of anti-epidermal rowth factor receptor(EGFR) antibody treatment and is also a predictive marker of its efficacy in colorectal cancer patients. However, severe skin disorders induced by such antibodies negatively impact on the quality of life of patients and decreases drug compliance during treatment. If we can predict the high-risk group susceptible to severe skin toxicity before treatment, we can undertake the early management of any arising skin disorders and formulate a more accurate prognosis for anti-EGFR antibody treatment. Previous studies have identified molecular markers of skin toxicity induced by anti-EGFR antibody, such as EGFR polymorphisms, the expression of inflammatory chemokines and serum levels of EGFR ligands. A clinical trial was undertaken involving the escalation of cetuximab doses, guided by the grade of skin toxicity observed, such as no or low-grade, in metastatic colorectal cancer(the EVEREST study). The dose escalation of cetuximab was confirmed by a safety profile and had the tendency to achieve a higher response rate in KRAS wild-type patients. A large, prospective randomized trial is now ongoing(EVEREST 2) and the results of this trial may contribute to personalized medicine in KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer patients.展开更多
Dear Editor,Recently,the phase III Asian XELIRI(capecitabine plus irinotecan)ProjecT(AXEPT)study demonstrated the non-inferiority of modified capecitabine plus irinotecan(mXELIRI)±bevacizumab(Bev)to fluorouracil ...Dear Editor,Recently,the phase III Asian XELIRI(capecitabine plus irinotecan)ProjecT(AXEPT)study demonstrated the non-inferiority of modified capecitabine plus irinotecan(mXELIRI)±bevacizumab(Bev)to fluorouracil plus leucovorin with irinotecan(FOLFIRI)±Bev in terms of overall survival(OS)as a second-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer[1,2].In the past decade,oral prodrugs of fluorouracil-containing regimens have shown similar efficacies to intravenous fluorouracilcontaining regimens.展开更多
文摘<strong>Purpose:</strong> Several studies have shown that fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin (SOX) is non-inferior to fluoropyrimidine plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. We investigated retrospectively the choice of second-line regimen, along with the proportion and feasibility of paclitaxel-containing regimen, in the subsequent treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with SOX as first-line chemotherapy. <strong>Materials and Methods:</strong> We retrospectively analyzed the impact of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy on both the choice of subsequent regimens and feasibility of subsequent chemotherapy with paclitaxel, focusing on patients with advanced gastric cancer who received S-1 plus oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy.<strong> Results:</strong> Twenty-seven from a total of 31 patients enrolled into the phase 2 and phase 3 study assessing S-1 plus oxaliplatin were analyzed (4 patients were deemed ineligible). Among 24 patients that had received second-line treatment, paclitaxel was not selected in 2 patients due to oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy. Paclitaxel was selected as second-line chemotherapy in 16 patients, as third-line chemotherapy in 6 patients and fourth-line chemotherapy in one patient. Severity of sensory neuropathy was grade 0/1/2/3 in 11/10/2/0 patients, respectively, immediately before treatment with paclitaxel, while the worst toxicity profile during paclitaxel treatment was grade 0/1/2/3 in 7/13/1/2 patients, respectively. Although there were no patients requiring dose reductions of paclitaxel due to neuropathy, 2 patients discontinued paclitaxel use due to grade 3 sensory neuropathy after 4 or 8 administrations of paclitaxel. <strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy during first-line chemotherapy may affect the choice and feasibility of subsequent chemotherapy with paclitaxel in advanced gastric cancer patients.
文摘Skin toxicity is a common symptom of anti-epidermal rowth factor receptor(EGFR) antibody treatment and is also a predictive marker of its efficacy in colorectal cancer patients. However, severe skin disorders induced by such antibodies negatively impact on the quality of life of patients and decreases drug compliance during treatment. If we can predict the high-risk group susceptible to severe skin toxicity before treatment, we can undertake the early management of any arising skin disorders and formulate a more accurate prognosis for anti-EGFR antibody treatment. Previous studies have identified molecular markers of skin toxicity induced by anti-EGFR antibody, such as EGFR polymorphisms, the expression of inflammatory chemokines and serum levels of EGFR ligands. A clinical trial was undertaken involving the escalation of cetuximab doses, guided by the grade of skin toxicity observed, such as no or low-grade, in metastatic colorectal cancer(the EVEREST study). The dose escalation of cetuximab was confirmed by a safety profile and had the tendency to achieve a higher response rate in KRAS wild-type patients. A large, prospective randomized trial is now ongoing(EVEREST 2) and the results of this trial may contribute to personalized medicine in KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer patients.
文摘Dear Editor,Recently,the phase III Asian XELIRI(capecitabine plus irinotecan)ProjecT(AXEPT)study demonstrated the non-inferiority of modified capecitabine plus irinotecan(mXELIRI)±bevacizumab(Bev)to fluorouracil plus leucovorin with irinotecan(FOLFIRI)±Bev in terms of overall survival(OS)as a second-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer[1,2].In the past decade,oral prodrugs of fluorouracil-containing regimens have shown similar efficacies to intravenous fluorouracilcontaining regimens.
