期刊文献+
共找到5篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
单发肝细胞癌合并微血管侵犯患者根治性切除术后辅助经导管动脉化疗栓塞治疗的疗效和安全性:一项随机临床试验
1
作者 Wei Wei Pei-En Jian +9 位作者 Shao-Hua Li Zhi-Xing Guo Yong-Fa Zhang yi-hong ling Xiao-Jun Lin Li Xu Ming Shi Lie Zheng Min-Shan Chen Rong-Ping Guo 《癌症》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2019年第3期132-144,共13页
背景与目的单发肝细胞癌(hepatocellular carcinoma,HCC)合并微血管侵犯(microvascular invasion,MVI)患者根治性切除术后的最佳辅助治疗方案一直存有争议。本试验旨在评估肝切除术后辅助经导管动脉化疗栓塞(transcatheter arterial che... 背景与目的单发肝细胞癌(hepatocellular carcinoma,HCC)合并微血管侵犯(microvascular invasion,MVI)患者根治性切除术后的最佳辅助治疗方案一直存有争议。本试验旨在评估肝切除术后辅助经导管动脉化疗栓塞(transcatheter arterial chemoembolization,TACE)与单纯肝切除术对直径≥5 cm单发HCC合并MVI患者的疗效和安全性。方法在本随机、开放性、III期试验中,将直径≥5 cm单发HCC合并MVI患者随机分为2组(1∶1):在肝切除术后接受1–2个周期的辅助TACE治疗(肝切除–TACE组)或单纯接受肝切除(单纯肝切除组)。主要终点是无病生存期(disease-free survival,DFS),次要终点包括总生存期(overall survival,OS)和不良事件。结果在2009年6月1日至2012年12月31日期间,共纳入250例患者,随机分为肝切除–TACE组(n=125)或单纯肝切除组(n=125)。两组患者的临床病理特征相似。从随机开始的中位随访时间为37.5个月(四分位距为18.3–48.2个月)。肝切除–TACE组的中位DFS显著长于单纯肝切除组[17.45个月(95%置信区间,confidence interval,CI:11.99–29.14)vs. 9.27个月(95%CI:6.05–13.70),风险比(hazard ratio,HR)=0.70(95%CI:0.52–0.95),P=0.020]。肝切除–TACE组中位OS也显著长于单纯肝切除组[44.29个月(95%CI:25.99–62.58)vs. 22.37个月(95%CI:10.84–33.91),HR=0.68(95%CI:0.48–0.97),P=0.029]。治疗相关不良事件在肝切除–TACE组中更为多见,虽然这些不良事件一般都是轻度和可控的。两组中最常见的3级或4级不良事件为中性粒细胞减少和肝功能异常。结论对于直径≥5 cm单发HCC合并MVI患者,根治术后进行辅助TACE治疗是一种合适的选择,且毒性是可接受的。 展开更多
关键词 单发肿瘤 肝细胞癌 辅助治疗 经导管动脉化疗栓塞 单纯肝切除术 微血管侵犯
下载PDF
Integrated genetic and epigenetic analysis reveals DNA repair alterations in multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma
2
作者 yi-hong ling Meng-Ni Liu +7 位作者 Yi-Xin Yin Zhong-Guo Zhou Jie-Wei Chen Wei Wei Jing-Ping Yun Dan Xie Rong-Ping Guo Mu-Yan Cai 《Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy》 SCIE CSCD 2023年第7期3240-3243,共4页
Dear Editor,Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)ranks the fourth most lethal cancer worldwide and over 50%of cases are diagnosed as multifocal HCC(mHCC)with dismal prognosis.1 mHCC displays more complicated intratumor hetero... Dear Editor,Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)ranks the fourth most lethal cancer worldwide and over 50%of cases are diagnosed as multifocal HCC(mHCC)with dismal prognosis.1 mHCC displays more complicated intratumor heterogeneity(ITH)and clonal evolution course which decreases the efficacy of clinical treatments. 展开更多
关键词 alterations MULTIFOCAL clinical
原文传递
Adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with solitary tumor and microvascular invasion: a randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety 被引量:70
3
作者 Wei Wei Pei-En Jian +9 位作者 Shao-Hua Li Zhi-Xing Guo Yong-Fa Zhang yi-hong ling Xiao-Jun Lin Li Xu Ming Shi Lie Zheng Min-Shan Chen Rong-Ping Guo 《Cancer Communications》 SCIE 2018年第1期655-666,共12页
Background:The optimal strategy for adjuvant therapy after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)patients with solitary tumor and microvascular invasion(MVI)is controversial.This trial evaluated the effi... Background:The optimal strategy for adjuvant therapy after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)patients with solitary tumor and microvascular invasion(MVI)is controversial.This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE)after hepatectomy versus hepatectomy alone in HCC patients with a solitary tumor≥5 cm and MVI.Methods:In this randomized,open-labeled,phase III trial,HCC patients with a solitary tumor≥5 cm and MVI were randomly assigned(1:1)to receive either 1-2 cycles of adjuvant TACE after hepatectomy(Hepatectomy-TACE)or hepatectomy alone(Hepatectomy Alone).The primary endpoint was disease-free survival(DFS);the secondary end-points included overall survival(OS)and adverse events.Results:Between June 1,2009,and December 31,2012,250 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the Hepatectomy-TACE group(n=125)or the Hepatectomy Alone group(n=125).Clinicopathological characteristics were balanced between the two groups.The median follow-up time from randomization was 37.5 months[interquartile range 18.3-48.2 months].The median DFS was significantly longer in the Hepatectomy-TACE group than in the Hepatectomy Alone group[17.45 months(95%confidence interval[CI]11.99-29.14)vs.9.27 months(95%CI 6.05-13.70),hazard ratio[HR]=0.70(95%CI 0.52-0.95),P=0.020],respectively.The median OS was also significantly longer in the Hepatectomy-TACE group than in the Hepatectomy Alone group[44.29 months(95%CI 25.99-62.58)vs.22.37 months(95%CI 10.84-33.91),HR=0.68(95%CI 0.48-0.97),P=0.029].Treatment-related adverse events were more frequently observed in the Hepatectomy-TACE group,although these were generally mild and manageable.The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events in both groups were neutropenia and liver dysfunction.Conclusion:Hepatectomy followed by adjuvant TACE is an appropriate option after radical resection in HCC patients with solitary tumor≥5 cm and MVI,with acceptable toxicity. 展开更多
关键词 Solitary tumor Hepatocellular carcinoma Adjuvant therapy Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization Hepatectomy alone Microvascular invasion
原文传递
一个中国Lynch综合征家系携带的MLH1基因第19号外显子移码突变:一项家系研究(英文) 被引量:1
4
作者 Qiao-qi SUI Wu JIANG +3 位作者 Xiao-dan WU yi-hong ling Zhi-zhong PAN Pei-rong DING 《Journal of Zhejiang University-Science B(Biomedicine & Biotechnology)》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2019年第1期105-108,共4页
目的:寻找一个Lynch综合征患者所在家系携带的DNA错配修复基因突变,探讨各突变对肿瘤发生发展的影响。创新点:MLH1的第19号外显子c.2250_2251insAA移码突变既往被认为是意义未名突变,而我们的研究为明确该突变的致病意义提供了依据。另... 目的:寻找一个Lynch综合征患者所在家系携带的DNA错配修复基因突变,探讨各突变对肿瘤发生发展的影响。创新点:MLH1的第19号外显子c.2250_2251insAA移码突变既往被认为是意义未名突变,而我们的研究为明确该突变的致病意义提供了依据。另外,我们首次报道了MLH3基因第1号外显子c.1397C>A突变。该突变有可能使Lynch综合征患者的发病年龄提前。方法:运用免疫组织化学技术检测家系先证者肿瘤组织中错配修复基因蛋白的缺失情况,使用二代测序技术通过先证者血标本明确患者所携带的突变。同时运用Sanger法检测家系其他成员该突变的携带情况以明确突变对肿瘤发生发展的影响。结论:我们在患者体内发现MLH1基因第19号外显子移码突变(c.2250_2251insAA)以及MLH3基因第1号外显子c.1397C>A突变。在患者家系中,我们仅检测到有MLH1突变,因此该突变极有可能为致病突变。 展开更多
关键词 Lync综合征 家系 DNA错配修复基因 置换 移码突变
原文传递
中国结直肠癌错配修复功能缺陷患病率较低:一项多中心研究 被引量:1
5
作者 Wu Jiang Qiao-Qi Sui +12 位作者 Wen-Liang Li Chuan-Feng Ke yi-hong ling Le-En Liao Zhu Zhu Mu-Yan Cai Jun Luo Lin-Lin Mao Hui-Zhong Zhang De-Sen Wan Zhi-Zhong Pan Hai-Xing Ju Pei-Rong Ding 《Gastroenterology Report》 SCIE EI 2020年第5期399-403,I0003,共6页
背景:尽管错配修复功能缺陷(dMMR)检测已被推荐用于所有结直肠癌患者,但其用于中国人群中仍缺乏数据支持。因此,我们调查了一个大型中国结直肠癌队列中dMMR的患病率及其临床病理特征。方法:纳入2010年8月至2016年9月间在四家医疗中心就... 背景:尽管错配修复功能缺陷(dMMR)检测已被推荐用于所有结直肠癌患者,但其用于中国人群中仍缺乏数据支持。因此,我们调查了一个大型中国结直肠癌队列中dMMR的患病率及其临床病理特征。方法:纳入2010年8月至2016年9月间在四家医疗中心就治的7,373例结直肠癌患者,记录其基线资料和病理特征,并比较MLH1/PMS2表达缺失(dMLH1/PMS2)与MSH2/MSH6表达缺失(dMSH2/MSH6)患者的临床病理特征。结果:本组病例中654例(8.9%)被判定为dMMR,其中401例(61.3%)为男性,中位发病年龄55岁(范围:22-87岁);355例(54.3%)为II期肠癌(AJCC 8版)。dMLH1/PMS2和dMSH2/MSH6的出现率分别为51.5%(337/654)和25.1%(164/654)。与dMSH2/MSH6组相比,dMLH1/PMS2组患者年龄较大(57岁vs 52岁,P<0.001),女性占比更高(45.7%vs 31.5,P=0.004),肿瘤更多位于右半结肠(59.0%vs 47.6%,P=0.015),具有肿瘤家族史的比例较低(29.7%vs 43.3%,P=0.003)。结论:中国结直肠癌人群dMMR患病率偏低,尤其是dMLH1/PMS2。不同类型dMMR患者有着不同的临床病理特征。 展开更多
关键词 PREVALENCE mismatch repair deficiency colorectal cancer
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部