期刊文献+
共找到4篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
体外冲击波碎石与输尿管软镜治疗10~20 mm肾下盏结石的对照研究 被引量:8
1
作者 罗松涛 朱永生 +5 位作者 刘星 刘鑫 唐义权 唐海 陈开发 粟宏伟 《中国内镜杂志》 2018年第5期37-41,共5页
目的比较输尿管软镜(FURS)下钬激光碎石术与体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)治疗10~20 mm肾下盏结石的主观和客观效果。方法回顾性分析2013年9月-2016年9月该院就诊的FURS下钬激光碎石和ESWL治疗10~20 mm肾下盏结石112例,对比两组再次治疗率、并... 目的比较输尿管软镜(FURS)下钬激光碎石术与体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)治疗10~20 mm肾下盏结石的主观和客观效果。方法回顾性分析2013年9月-2016年9月该院就诊的FURS下钬激光碎石和ESWL治疗10~20 mm肾下盏结石112例,对比两组再次治疗率、并发症发生率、结石清除率,以及患者主观评分。结果 FURS组结石清除率明显高于ESWL组(86.1%vs 61.8%,P<0.05),ESWL组再次治疗率明显高于FURS组(44.7%vs 8.3%,P<0.05),并发症发生率FURS组高于ESWL组(11.1%vs 7.9%),但两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。患者总体满意评分[(2.92±1.24)vs(2.07±1.35)分,P<0.05]和排尿症状评分[(3.87±0.64)vs(2.23±0.73)分,P<0.05],FURS组均高于ESWL组,另有更多的人愿意再次接受FURS的治疗(83.3%vs 55.3%,P<0.05)。结论 FURS因为更高的结石清除率和较低的再次手术率优于ESWL,并且FURS能获得更高的患者满意度。 展开更多
关键词 肾下盏结石 输尿管软镜 体外冲击波碎石
下载PDF
Lymphopenia predicts disease severity of COVID-19:a descriptive and predictive study 被引量:35
2
作者 Li Tan Qi Wang +5 位作者 Duanyang Zhang Jinya Ding Qianchuan Huang yi-quan tang Qiongshu Wang Hongming Miao 《Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy》 SCIE CSCD 2020年第1期2129-2131,共3页
Dear Editor,An outbreak of an unknown infectious pneumonia has recently occurred in Wuhan,China.1 The pathogen of the disease was quickly identified as a novel coronavirus(SARS-CoV-2,severe acute respiratory syndrome ... Dear Editor,An outbreak of an unknown infectious pneumonia has recently occurred in Wuhan,China.1 The pathogen of the disease was quickly identified as a novel coronavirus(SARS-CoV-2,severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2),and the disease was named coronavirus disease-19(COVID-19).2 The virus has so far caused 78,959 confirmed cases and 2791 deaths in China according to the reports of government.COVID-19 has been spreading in many countries such as Japan,Korea,Singapore,Iran,and Italia. 展开更多
关键词 SEVERITY ACUTE LYMPH
原文传递
Correction:Lymphopenia predicts disease severity of COVID-19:a descriptive and predictive study 被引量:5
3
作者 Li Tan Qi Wang +5 位作者 Duanyang Zhang Jinya Ding Qianchuan Huang yi-quan tang Qiongshu Wang d Hongming Miao 《Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy》 SCIE CSCD 2020年第1期1952-1952,共1页
Correction to:Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-020-0148-4,published online 27 March 2020 Since the publication of this article,1 we noticed a minor mistake in the reference that ... Correction to:Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-020-0148-4,published online 27 March 2020 Since the publication of this article,1 we noticed a minor mistake in the reference that needs to be corrected. 展开更多
关键词 SEVERITY LYMPH Therapy
原文传递
Screening strategy and time points for newborn hearing re-screening with high risk factors
4
作者 Qing-Xiang Zeng Ren-Zhong Luo +3 位作者 Sheng-Bao Yan yi-quan tang Rui-Jin Wen Wen-Long Liu 《World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery》 2022年第3期257-261,共5页
Objective: To compare and analyze the pass rate and screening strategy of hearing rescreening for newborns with high risk factors.Methods: Retrospective chart review of high-risk newborns who failed their initial newb... Objective: To compare and analyze the pass rate and screening strategy of hearing rescreening for newborns with high risk factors.Methods: Retrospective chart review of high-risk newborns who failed their initial newborn hearing screen and subsequently underwent secondary hearing tests from June 2011 to June 2018 in Guangzhou Women and Children’’s Medical Center were performed.Results: Eight hundred and sixty-eight newborns with high risk factors were included in the study. The 57-70 days (83.5%) and 71-84 days (83.4%) group had the highest pass rate compared with 42-56 days (75.8%) and < 42 days (68.3%) group. As for different screening strategies, the pass rate of OAE(otoacoustic emissions), AABR (auto auditory brainstem response) and OAE + AABR was the highest in 57-70 days group and 71-84 days group, respectively. The OAE + AABR had the lowest pass rate compared to the other two modalities. When the pass rate was compared as different risk factors, the 57-70 days and 71-84 days group also had the highest pass rate compared with 42-56 days and < 42 days group and the pass rate had no significant differences among various risk factors group.Conclusion: Our results showed that all the pass rate of OAE, AABR and OAE+ AABR was the highest in 57-70 days group and 71-84 days group with significant difference, suggesting that the delayed screening time (>57 days) may increase the re-screening pass rate and reduce anxiety of parents, which is of great significance for clinical work. 展开更多
关键词 Auto auditory brainstem response Hearing screening NEWBORNS Otoacoustic emissions
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部