Simplified liver imaging reporting and data system for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND The liver imaging reporting and data system(LI-RADS)diagnostic table has 15 cells and is too complex.The diagnostic performance of LI-RADS for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)is not satisfactory on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging(EOB-MRI).AIM To evaluate the ability of the simplified LI-RADS(sLI-RADS)to diagnose HCC on EOB-MRI.METHODS A total of 331 patients with 356 hepatic observations were retrospectively analysed.The diagnostic performance of sLI-RADS A-D using a single threshold was evaluated and compared with LI-RADS v2018 to determine the optimal sLIRADS.The algorithms of sLI-RADS A-D are as follows:The single threshold for sLI-RADS A and B was 10 mm,that is,classified observations≥10mm using an algorithm of 10-19 mm observations(sLI-RADS A)and≥20 mm observations(sLI-RADS B)in the diagnosis table of LI-RADS v2018,respectively,while the classification algorithm remained unchanged for observations<10 mm;the single threshold for sLI-RADS C and D was 20 mm,that is,for<20 mm observations,the algorithms for<10 mm observations(sLI-RADS C)and 10-19 mm observations(sLI-RADS D)were used,respectively,while the algorithm remained unchanged for observations≥20 mm.With hepatobiliary phase(HBP)hypointensity as a major feature(MF),the final sLI-RADS(F-sLI-RADS)was formed according to the optimal sLI-RADS,and its diagnostic performance was evaluated.The times needed to classify the observations according to F-sLIRADS and LI-RADS v2018 were compared.RESULTS The optimal sLI-RADS was sLI-RADS D(with a single threshold of 20 mm),because its sensitivity was greater than that of LI-RADS v2018(89.8%vs 87.0%,P=0.031),and its specificity was not lower(89.4%vs 90.1%,P>0.999).With HBP hypointensity as an MF,the sensitivity of F-sLI-RADS was greater than that of LI-RADS v2018(93.0%vs 87.0%,P<0.001)and sLI-RADS D(93.0%vs 89.8%,P=0.016),without a lower specificity(86.5%vs 90.1%,P=0.062;86.5%vs 89.4%,P=0.125).Compared with that of LI-RADS v2018,the time to classify lesions according to FsLI-RADS was shorter(51±21 s vs 73±24 s,P<0.001).CONCLUSION The use of sLI-RADS with HBP hypointensity as an MF may improve the sensitivity of HCC diagnosis and reduce lesion classification time.