Background:There were few studies on real-world data about autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation(auto-HSCT)or allogeneic HSCT(allo-HSCT)in peripheral T-cell lymphoma(PTCL).This study aimed to investigate ...Background:There were few studies on real-world data about autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation(auto-HSCT)or allogeneic HSCT(allo-HSCT)in peripheral T-cell lymphoma(PTCL).This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients who received auto-HSCT or allo-HSCT in China.Methods:From July 2007 to June 2017,a total of 128 patients who received auto-HSCT(n=72)or allo-HSCT(n=56)at eight medical centers across China were included in this study.We retrospectively collected their demographic and clinical data and compared the clinical outcomes between groups.Results:Patients receiving allo-HSCT were more likely to be diagnosed with stage III or IV disease(95%vs.82%,P=0.027),bone marrow involvement(42%vs.15%,P=0.001),chemotherapy-resistant disease(41%vs.8%,P=0.001),and progression disease(32%vs.4%,P<0.001)at transplantation than those receiving auto-HSCT.With a median follow-up of 30(2–143)months,3-year overall survival(OS)and progression-free survival(PFS)in the auto-HSCT group were 70%(48/63)and 59%(42/63),respectively.Three-year OS and PFS for allo-HSCT recipients were 46%(27/54)and 44%(29/54),respectively.There was no difference in relapse rate(34%[17/63]in auto-HSCT vs.29%[15/54]in allo-HSCT,P=0.840).Three-year non-relapse mortality rate in auto-HSCT recipients was 6%(4/63)compared with 27%(14/54)for allo-HSCT recipients(P=0.004).Subanalyses showed that patients with lower prognostic index scores for PTCL(PIT)who received auto-HSCT in an upfront setting had a better outcome than patients with higher PIT scores(3-year OS:85%vs.40%,P=0.003).Patients with complete remission(CR)undergoing auto-HSCT had better survival(3-year OS:88%vs.48%in allo-HSCT,P=0.008).For patients beyond CR,the outcome of patients who received allo-HSCT was similar to that in the atuo-HSCT group(3-year OS:51%vs.46%,P=0.300).Conclusions:Our study provided real-world data about auto-HSCT and allo-HSCT in China.Auto-HSCT seemed to be associated with better survival for patients in good condition(lower PIT score and/or better disease control).For patients possessing unfavorable characteristics,the survival of patients receiving allo-HSCT group was similar to that in the auto-HSCT group.展开更多
文摘Background:There were few studies on real-world data about autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation(auto-HSCT)or allogeneic HSCT(allo-HSCT)in peripheral T-cell lymphoma(PTCL).This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients who received auto-HSCT or allo-HSCT in China.Methods:From July 2007 to June 2017,a total of 128 patients who received auto-HSCT(n=72)or allo-HSCT(n=56)at eight medical centers across China were included in this study.We retrospectively collected their demographic and clinical data and compared the clinical outcomes between groups.Results:Patients receiving allo-HSCT were more likely to be diagnosed with stage III or IV disease(95%vs.82%,P=0.027),bone marrow involvement(42%vs.15%,P=0.001),chemotherapy-resistant disease(41%vs.8%,P=0.001),and progression disease(32%vs.4%,P<0.001)at transplantation than those receiving auto-HSCT.With a median follow-up of 30(2–143)months,3-year overall survival(OS)and progression-free survival(PFS)in the auto-HSCT group were 70%(48/63)and 59%(42/63),respectively.Three-year OS and PFS for allo-HSCT recipients were 46%(27/54)and 44%(29/54),respectively.There was no difference in relapse rate(34%[17/63]in auto-HSCT vs.29%[15/54]in allo-HSCT,P=0.840).Three-year non-relapse mortality rate in auto-HSCT recipients was 6%(4/63)compared with 27%(14/54)for allo-HSCT recipients(P=0.004).Subanalyses showed that patients with lower prognostic index scores for PTCL(PIT)who received auto-HSCT in an upfront setting had a better outcome than patients with higher PIT scores(3-year OS:85%vs.40%,P=0.003).Patients with complete remission(CR)undergoing auto-HSCT had better survival(3-year OS:88%vs.48%in allo-HSCT,P=0.008).For patients beyond CR,the outcome of patients who received allo-HSCT was similar to that in the atuo-HSCT group(3-year OS:51%vs.46%,P=0.300).Conclusions:Our study provided real-world data about auto-HSCT and allo-HSCT in China.Auto-HSCT seemed to be associated with better survival for patients in good condition(lower PIT score and/or better disease control).For patients possessing unfavorable characteristics,the survival of patients receiving allo-HSCT group was similar to that in the auto-HSCT group.
