BACKGROUND Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)and surgical resection are the standard of care for cT1N0M0 esophageal cancer(EC),whereas definitive chemoradiotherapy(d-CRT)is a treatment option.Nevertheless,the compa...BACKGROUND Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)and surgical resection are the standard of care for cT1N0M0 esophageal cancer(EC),whereas definitive chemoradiotherapy(d-CRT)is a treatment option.Nevertheless,the comparative efficiency and safety of ESD,surgery and d-CRT for cT1N0M0 EC remain unclear.AIM To compare the efficiency and safety of ESD,surgery and d-CRT for cT1N0M0 EC.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the hospitalized data of a total of 472 consecutive patients with cT1N0M0 EC treated at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer center between 2017-2019 and followed up until October 30th,2022.We analyzed demographic,medical recorded,histopathologic characteristics,imaging and endoscopic,and follow-up data.The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to analyze the difference of survival outcome by treatments.Inverse probability of treatment weighting(IPTW)was used to minimize potential confounding factors.RESULTS We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent ESD(n=99)or surgery(n=220)or d-CRT(n=16)at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from 2017 to 2019.The median follow-up time for the ESD group,the surgery group,and the d-CRT group was 42.0 mo(95%CI:35.0-60.2),45.0 mo(95%CI:34.0-61.75)and 32.5 mo(95%CI:28.3-40.0),respectively.After adjusting for background factors using IPTW,the highest 3-year overall survival(OS)rate and 3-year recurrence-free survival(RFS)rate were observed in the ESD group(3-year OS:99.7% and 94.7% and 79.1%;and 3-year RFS:98.3%,87.4% and 79.1%,in the ESD,surgical,and d-CRT groups,respectively).There was no difference of severe complications occurring between the three groups(P≥0.05).Multivariate analysis showed that treatment method,histology and depth of infiltration were independently associated with OS and RFS.CONCLUSION For cT1N0M0 EC,ESD had better long-term survival and lower hospitalization costs than those who underwent d-CRT and surgery,with a similar rate of severe complications occurring.展开更多
BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS)and magnifying endoscopy(ME)reliably determine indications for endoscopic resection in patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(SESCC).ME is widely accepte...BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS)and magnifying endoscopy(ME)reliably determine indications for endoscopic resection in patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(SESCC).ME is widely accepted for predicting the invasion depth of superficial esophageal cancer with satisfying accuracy.However,the addition of EUS is controversial.AIM To evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of ME vs EUS for invasion depth prediction and investigate the influencing factors in patients with SESCC to determine the best diagnostic model in China.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed patients with suspected SESCC who completed both ME and EUS and then underwent endoscopic or surgical resection at Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center between January 2018 and December 2021.We evaluated and compared the diagnostic efficiency of EUS and ME according to histological results,and investigated the influencing factors.RESULTS We included 152 lesions from 144 patients in this study.The diagnostic accuracies of ME and EUS in differentiating invasion depth were not significantly different(73.0%and 66.4%,P=0.24);both demonstrated moderate consistency with the pathological results(ME:kappa=0.58,95%confidence interval[CI]:0.48-0.68,P<0.01;EUS:kappa=0.46,95%CI:0.34-0.57,P<0.01).ME was significantly more accurate in the diagnosis of high-grade intraepithelial(HGIN)or carcinoma in situ(odds ratio[OR]=3.62,95%CI:1.43-9.16,P=0.007)subgroups.Using a miniature probe rather than conventional EUS can improve the accuracy of lesion depth determination(82.3%vs 49.3%,P<0.01).Less than a quarter of circumferential occupation and application of a miniature probe were independent risk factors for the accuracy of tumor invasion depth as assessed by EUS(<1/4 circumferential occupation:OR=3.07,95%CI:1.04-9.10;application of a miniature probe:OR=5.28,95%CI:2.41-11.59,P<0.01).Of the 41 lesions(41/152,27.0%)that were misdiagnosed by ME,24 were corrected by EUS(24/41,58.5%).CONCLUSION Preoperative diagnosis of SESCC should be conducted endoscopically using white light and magnification.In China,EUS can be added after obtaining patient consent.Use of a highfrequency miniature probe or miniature probe combined with conventional EUS is preferable.展开更多
AIM: To quantify the changes in the lens profile with accommodation in different age groups. METHODS: The Pentacam HR system was used to obtain the images of the anterior eye segment from 23 young and 15 presbyopic em...AIM: To quantify the changes in the lens profile with accommodation in different age groups. METHODS: The Pentacam HR system was used to obtain the images of the anterior eye segment from 23 young and 15 presbyopic emmetropic subjects in unaccommodated (with an accommodation stimulus of 0.0D) and accommodated (with an accommodation stimulus of 5.0D for the young group and 1.0D for the presbyopic group) states. The phakic crystalline lens shape, including curvature of crystalline lens and central lens thickness (CLT), and the measurements of anterior segment length (ASL), central anterior chamber depth (CACD) were investigated. The anterior chamber volume (ACV) was also measured. RESULTS: The reduction of CACD and ACV were significant in both groups after accommodation stimulus. From the profile of anterior eye segment, a significant decrease in anterior crystalline lens radii of curvature (-2.52mm) and a mean increase in CLT (0.222mm) and ASL (0.1138mm) were found in the. young group with an accommodation stimulus of 5.0D. However, no statistically significant changes of CLT, ASL, or crystalline lens radii of curvature were found in the presbyopic group. CONCLUSION: Our data showed that the shallowing of anterior chamber during accommodation was caused by the forward bulging of the anterior lens surface, rather than by anterior shifting of lens position in either young or presbyopic subjects.展开更多
基金Supported by the Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute Science and Technology Program,No.M202013Guangdong Medical Research Foundation,No.A2021369.
文摘BACKGROUND Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)and surgical resection are the standard of care for cT1N0M0 esophageal cancer(EC),whereas definitive chemoradiotherapy(d-CRT)is a treatment option.Nevertheless,the comparative efficiency and safety of ESD,surgery and d-CRT for cT1N0M0 EC remain unclear.AIM To compare the efficiency and safety of ESD,surgery and d-CRT for cT1N0M0 EC.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the hospitalized data of a total of 472 consecutive patients with cT1N0M0 EC treated at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer center between 2017-2019 and followed up until October 30th,2022.We analyzed demographic,medical recorded,histopathologic characteristics,imaging and endoscopic,and follow-up data.The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to analyze the difference of survival outcome by treatments.Inverse probability of treatment weighting(IPTW)was used to minimize potential confounding factors.RESULTS We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent ESD(n=99)or surgery(n=220)or d-CRT(n=16)at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from 2017 to 2019.The median follow-up time for the ESD group,the surgery group,and the d-CRT group was 42.0 mo(95%CI:35.0-60.2),45.0 mo(95%CI:34.0-61.75)and 32.5 mo(95%CI:28.3-40.0),respectively.After adjusting for background factors using IPTW,the highest 3-year overall survival(OS)rate and 3-year recurrence-free survival(RFS)rate were observed in the ESD group(3-year OS:99.7% and 94.7% and 79.1%;and 3-year RFS:98.3%,87.4% and 79.1%,in the ESD,surgical,and d-CRT groups,respectively).There was no difference of severe complications occurring between the three groups(P≥0.05).Multivariate analysis showed that treatment method,histology and depth of infiltration were independently associated with OS and RFS.CONCLUSION For cT1N0M0 EC,ESD had better long-term survival and lower hospitalization costs than those who underwent d-CRT and surgery,with a similar rate of severe complications occurring.
基金Supported by the Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute Science and Technology Program,No.M202013.
文摘BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS)and magnifying endoscopy(ME)reliably determine indications for endoscopic resection in patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(SESCC).ME is widely accepted for predicting the invasion depth of superficial esophageal cancer with satisfying accuracy.However,the addition of EUS is controversial.AIM To evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of ME vs EUS for invasion depth prediction and investigate the influencing factors in patients with SESCC to determine the best diagnostic model in China.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed patients with suspected SESCC who completed both ME and EUS and then underwent endoscopic or surgical resection at Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center between January 2018 and December 2021.We evaluated and compared the diagnostic efficiency of EUS and ME according to histological results,and investigated the influencing factors.RESULTS We included 152 lesions from 144 patients in this study.The diagnostic accuracies of ME and EUS in differentiating invasion depth were not significantly different(73.0%and 66.4%,P=0.24);both demonstrated moderate consistency with the pathological results(ME:kappa=0.58,95%confidence interval[CI]:0.48-0.68,P<0.01;EUS:kappa=0.46,95%CI:0.34-0.57,P<0.01).ME was significantly more accurate in the diagnosis of high-grade intraepithelial(HGIN)or carcinoma in situ(odds ratio[OR]=3.62,95%CI:1.43-9.16,P=0.007)subgroups.Using a miniature probe rather than conventional EUS can improve the accuracy of lesion depth determination(82.3%vs 49.3%,P<0.01).Less than a quarter of circumferential occupation and application of a miniature probe were independent risk factors for the accuracy of tumor invasion depth as assessed by EUS(<1/4 circumferential occupation:OR=3.07,95%CI:1.04-9.10;application of a miniature probe:OR=5.28,95%CI:2.41-11.59,P<0.01).Of the 41 lesions(41/152,27.0%)that were misdiagnosed by ME,24 were corrected by EUS(24/41,58.5%).CONCLUSION Preoperative diagnosis of SESCC should be conducted endoscopically using white light and magnification.In China,EUS can be added after obtaining patient consent.Use of a highfrequency miniature probe or miniature probe combined with conventional EUS is preferable.
基金Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81070747)Research Award for New Century Excellent Talents in University (No. NCET08-0586)in ChinaScience and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China (No.2010B090400416)
文摘AIM: To quantify the changes in the lens profile with accommodation in different age groups. METHODS: The Pentacam HR system was used to obtain the images of the anterior eye segment from 23 young and 15 presbyopic emmetropic subjects in unaccommodated (with an accommodation stimulus of 0.0D) and accommodated (with an accommodation stimulus of 5.0D for the young group and 1.0D for the presbyopic group) states. The phakic crystalline lens shape, including curvature of crystalline lens and central lens thickness (CLT), and the measurements of anterior segment length (ASL), central anterior chamber depth (CACD) were investigated. The anterior chamber volume (ACV) was also measured. RESULTS: The reduction of CACD and ACV were significant in both groups after accommodation stimulus. From the profile of anterior eye segment, a significant decrease in anterior crystalline lens radii of curvature (-2.52mm) and a mean increase in CLT (0.222mm) and ASL (0.1138mm) were found in the. young group with an accommodation stimulus of 5.0D. However, no statistically significant changes of CLT, ASL, or crystalline lens radii of curvature were found in the presbyopic group. CONCLUSION: Our data showed that the shallowing of anterior chamber during accommodation was caused by the forward bulging of the anterior lens surface, rather than by anterior shifting of lens position in either young or presbyopic subjects.
