期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Virtual reality training improves accommodative facility and accommodative range 被引量:3
1
作者 Dong-Yu Guo yuan-yuan shen +6 位作者 Miao-Miao Zhu Yang-Yang Zhan Xia-Wei Wang Jian-Hua Xia Bo Jiang Yang-Shun Gu Yan Long 《International Journal of Ophthalmology(English edition)》 SCIE CAS 2022年第7期1116-1121,共6页
AIM: To evaluate the effects of virtual reality(VR) training on different parameters of vision.METHODS: Sixty individuals ranged 18-60 years old with asthenopia were randomly divided into short-term(n=40) and long-ter... AIM: To evaluate the effects of virtual reality(VR) training on different parameters of vision.METHODS: Sixty individuals ranged 18-60 years old with asthenopia were randomly divided into short-term(n=40) and long-term(n=20) treatment groups. They were given a specially designed VR training device only once for 15 min or 3-4 times a day for 15 min each time for 1 mo. The visual acuity, spherical equivalent, accommodative range, accommodative facility, pupil size, and visual fatigue were evaluated before(control) and after VR training. RESULTS: The visual acuity, accommodative range, and accommodative facility increased in subjects of the shortterm treatment group, whereas their pupil size contracted significantly. No significant changes in spherical equivalent and visual fatigue were observed. The changes in distant vision and corrected visual acuity were positively correlated with those in pupil size, but not with spherical equivalent. The accommodative range and accommodative facility improved significantly in subjects of the long-term treatment group. No significant changes in visual acuity, spherical equivalent, pupil size, and visual fatigue were noted. CONCLUSION: VR training can improve the accommodative range and accommodative facility of human eyes. Although short-term VR training can transiently improve vision, which probably due to bright light adaptation, there is no evidence that it can improve myopia. 展开更多
关键词 virtual reality visual function MYOPIA visual fatigue ACCOMMODATION
下载PDF
利用剪切黏弹性模量对大鼠肝纤维化流变特性进行分析和建模(英文)
2
作者 Ying ZHU Yi ZHENG +6 位作者 yuan-yuan shen Xin CHEN Xin-yu ZHANG Hao-ming LIN Yan-rong GUO Tian-fu WANG Si-ping CHEN 《Journal of Zhejiang University-Science B(Biomedicine & Biotechnology)》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2014年第4期375-381,共7页
研究目的:肝脏的纤维化进程改变肝脏组织的流变属性。创新要点:本文利用剪切黏弹性模量描绘并比较了大鼠肝脏F0期到F4期的纤维化过程。研究方法:两个黏弹性模型,即Zener模型和Voigt模型用于解释流变力学测试得到的实验数据,由此得到每... 研究目的:肝脏的纤维化进程改变肝脏组织的流变属性。创新要点:本文利用剪切黏弹性模量描绘并比较了大鼠肝脏F0期到F4期的纤维化过程。研究方法:两个黏弹性模型,即Zener模型和Voigt模型用于解释流变力学测试得到的实验数据,由此得到每个纤维化分期的肝脏弹性和黏性值。重要结论:肝脏中度纤维化(≤F2期)与黏弹性值密切相关。Zener模型的弹性均值E1从F0期的(0.452±0.094)kPa增加到F2期的(1.311±0.717)kPa,而Voigt模型的弹性均值E从F0期的(0.618±0.089)kPa增加到F2期的(1.701±0.844)kPa。Zener模型的黏性均值从F0期的(3.499±0.186)Pa·s增加到F2期的(4.947±1.811)Pa·s,而Voigt模型的黏性均值从F0期的(3.379±0.316)Pa·s增加到F2期的(4.625±1.296)Pa·s。无论选用哪个黏弹性模型,在F1期和F2期,肝脏弹性值的标准差比黏性值的标准差变化要小。因此,测得的弹性比黏性更有效地区分肝纤维化F0期到F2期。 展开更多
关键词 生物力学 流变属性 肝纤维化 黏弹性 剪切模量 弹性 黏性 Zener模型 Voigt模型
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部