Objective To investigate the optimal glycated haemoglobin （HbAlc） cut off points and evaluate the impact of HbAlc on diabetes and pre-diabetes in middle-aged and elderly population. Methods Subjects were recruited f...Objective To investigate the optimal glycated haemoglobin （HbAlc） cut off points and evaluate the impact of HbAlc on diabetes and pre-diabetes in middle-aged and elderly population. Methods Subjects were recruited from Shanghai Changfeng Study. A total of 1 973 community-based participants （age_〉45） without known diabetes underwent oral glucose tolerance test （OG3-r） by using a 75-g oral glucose load and HbAlc was measured by using high performance liquid chromatography （HPLC）. Subjects were classified as normal glucose tolerance （NGT）, pre-diabetes（impaired glucose regulation, IGR） and new diagnosed diabetes （NDD） per 1999 WHO criteria. Two tests are compared with receiver operating characteristic curve （ROC）. Results Among 1973 subjects, 271 （13.7%） were diagnosed as NDD and 474 （24.0%） as IGR by using OGTT. HbAlc was 5.7%_＋0.7% in this population. Use of 6.5% as the HbAIC cutoff point has sensitivity of 38.7% and specificity of 98.5%. We recommend 6.0% as a better cutoff value for diagnosis of diabetes in this population （AUC 0.829, 95% CI 0.798-0.860, P〈0.001） with its sensitivity and specificity as 66.1% and 86.8%. For IGR, the results showed low sensitivity （44.9%） and specificity （66.7%） with an AUC of 0.571 for HbAlc when 5.8% was used as the cutoff point. Participants detected with HbAlc_〉6.0% were associated with nearly the same metabolic characteristics, including body mass index （BMI）, blood pressure, lipid profile and urine albumin-creatinine ratio （uACR） compared with diabetic subjects detected by OGTT. Conclusion The optimum HbAlc cutoff point for diabetes in our study population was lower than ADA criteria, and HbAlc may not be used to identify IGR.展开更多
基金supported by grants from National Key Technologies R&D Program (Grant No. 2008 BAI52B03 to X. Gao)the National Key Technologies R&D Program (Grant No. 2009BAI80B01 to H. Lin)the Major Project of Subject Construction of Shanghai Bureau of Health (Grant No.08GWZX0203 to X. Gao)
文摘Objective To investigate the optimal glycated haemoglobin （HbAlc） cut off points and evaluate the impact of HbAlc on diabetes and pre-diabetes in middle-aged and elderly population. Methods Subjects were recruited from Shanghai Changfeng Study. A total of 1 973 community-based participants （age_〉45） without known diabetes underwent oral glucose tolerance test （OG3-r） by using a 75-g oral glucose load and HbAlc was measured by using high performance liquid chromatography （HPLC）. Subjects were classified as normal glucose tolerance （NGT）, pre-diabetes（impaired glucose regulation, IGR） and new diagnosed diabetes （NDD） per 1999 WHO criteria. Two tests are compared with receiver operating characteristic curve （ROC）. Results Among 1973 subjects, 271 （13.7%） were diagnosed as NDD and 474 （24.0%） as IGR by using OGTT. HbAlc was 5.7%_＋0.7% in this population. Use of 6.5% as the HbAIC cutoff point has sensitivity of 38.7% and specificity of 98.5%. We recommend 6.0% as a better cutoff value for diagnosis of diabetes in this population （AUC 0.829, 95% CI 0.798-0.860, P〈0.001） with its sensitivity and specificity as 66.1% and 86.8%. For IGR, the results showed low sensitivity （44.9%） and specificity （66.7%） with an AUC of 0.571 for HbAlc when 5.8% was used as the cutoff point. Participants detected with HbAlc_〉6.0% were associated with nearly the same metabolic characteristics, including body mass index （BMI）, blood pressure, lipid profile and urine albumin-creatinine ratio （uACR） compared with diabetic subjects detected by OGTT. Conclusion The optimum HbAlc cutoff point for diabetes in our study population was lower than ADA criteria, and HbAlc may not be used to identify IGR.
