目的总结关节置换术后手术部位感染预防的证据,为临床实践提供参考依据。方法检索BMJ Best Practice、Up to Date,BMJ Clinical Evidence、世界卫生组织(WHO)、国际指南协作网(GIN)、英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)、美国国立指南...目的总结关节置换术后手术部位感染预防的证据,为临床实践提供参考依据。方法检索BMJ Best Practice、Up to Date,BMJ Clinical Evidence、世界卫生组织(WHO)、国际指南协作网(GIN)、英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)、美国国立指南库(NGC)、加拿大安大略医学会(RNAO)、苏格兰院际间指南网(SIGN)、新西兰指南协作组(NZGG)、美国医师学会俱乐部(ACP Club)、Cochrane临床对照试验中心注册数据库、JBI循证卫生保健知识库、PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、中国知网、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库以及欧洲灰色文献信息系统(SIGLE)中与髋、膝关节置换术后手术部位感染预防相关的证据,检索时间为近5年内,证据的提取和质量评价均由2名研究人员独立完成。结果共纳入11项研究,其中包括6篇循证指南、1篇专家共识、4篇系统评价。研究人员提炼出23条、3个方面(术前、术中、术后)髋、膝关节置换术后手术部位感染的预防证据,A级推荐11条,B级推荐12条。结论最佳证据显示,目前髋、膝关节置换术后手术部位感染的原因众多,严重的手术部位感染会阻碍加速康复的进程,证据应用者应因地制宜,精准把握术前、术中和术后的每一个环节,优化手术与护理流程以预防手术部位感染。展开更多
Objective： Total hip arthroplasty （THA） and hemiarthroplasty （HA） are effective methods currently used to treat femoral neck fracture in elderly patients, but the two options remain controversial in patients over...Objective： Total hip arthroplasty （THA） and hemiarthroplasty （HA） are effective methods currently used to treat femoral neck fracture in elderly patients, but the two options remain controversial in patients over 70 years old. The main purpose of our study was to determine whether THA or HA is a superior treatment of femoral fractures involving a displaced neck in patients who are over 70 years of age. Methods： A computer-based online search of Medline （1970-2011）, PubMed （1977-2011）, and the Cochrane Cen- tral Register of Controlled Trials （2002-201 l） was conducted. Six relevant randomized controlled trials with a total of 739 patients were included for the final analysis. The analysis was performed with software RevMan 5.0. Results： We found that compared with THA, HA needed shorter average time and lost less blood. While over the long-term follow-up, THA patients exhibited significantly less pain and better function and were less likely to require a revision hip surgery. Postoperative infection was equally common among HA and THA patients. Conclusions： The significant differences in outcomes suggest that THA is a valuable treatment option for active elderly hip fracture individuals. However, patients who are older, impaired or institutionalized benefit from HA.展开更多
文摘目的总结关节置换术后手术部位感染预防的证据,为临床实践提供参考依据。方法检索BMJ Best Practice、Up to Date,BMJ Clinical Evidence、世界卫生组织(WHO)、国际指南协作网(GIN)、英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)、美国国立指南库(NGC)、加拿大安大略医学会(RNAO)、苏格兰院际间指南网(SIGN)、新西兰指南协作组(NZGG)、美国医师学会俱乐部(ACP Club)、Cochrane临床对照试验中心注册数据库、JBI循证卫生保健知识库、PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、中国知网、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库以及欧洲灰色文献信息系统(SIGLE)中与髋、膝关节置换术后手术部位感染预防相关的证据,检索时间为近5年内,证据的提取和质量评价均由2名研究人员独立完成。结果共纳入11项研究,其中包括6篇循证指南、1篇专家共识、4篇系统评价。研究人员提炼出23条、3个方面(术前、术中、术后)髋、膝关节置换术后手术部位感染的预防证据,A级推荐11条,B级推荐12条。结论最佳证据显示,目前髋、膝关节置换术后手术部位感染的原因众多,严重的手术部位感染会阻碍加速康复的进程,证据应用者应因地制宜,精准把握术前、术中和术后的每一个环节,优化手术与护理流程以预防手术部位感染。
文摘Objective： Total hip arthroplasty （THA） and hemiarthroplasty （HA） are effective methods currently used to treat femoral neck fracture in elderly patients, but the two options remain controversial in patients over 70 years old. The main purpose of our study was to determine whether THA or HA is a superior treatment of femoral fractures involving a displaced neck in patients who are over 70 years of age. Methods： A computer-based online search of Medline （1970-2011）, PubMed （1977-2011）, and the Cochrane Cen- tral Register of Controlled Trials （2002-201 l） was conducted. Six relevant randomized controlled trials with a total of 739 patients were included for the final analysis. The analysis was performed with software RevMan 5.0. Results： We found that compared with THA, HA needed shorter average time and lost less blood. While over the long-term follow-up, THA patients exhibited significantly less pain and better function and were less likely to require a revision hip surgery. Postoperative infection was equally common among HA and THA patients. Conclusions： The significant differences in outcomes suggest that THA is a valuable treatment option for active elderly hip fracture individuals. However, patients who are older, impaired or institutionalized benefit from HA.
