Background Good quality of care for inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)depends on high-standard management and facility in the IBD center.Yet,there are no clear measures or criteria for evaluating pediatric IBD(PIBD)cente...Background Good quality of care for inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)depends on high-standard management and facility in the IBD center.Yet,there are no clear measures or criteria for evaluating pediatric IBD(PIBD)center in China.The aim of this study was to develop a comprehensive set of quality indicators(QIs)for evaluating PIBD center in China.Methods A modified Delphi consensus-based approach was used to identify a set of QIs of structure,process,and outcomes for defining the criteria.The process included an exhaustive search using complementary approaches to identify potential QIs,and two web-based voting rounds to select the QIs defining the criteria for PIBD center.Results A total of 101 QIs(35 structures,48 processes and 18 outcomes)were included in this consensus.Structure QIs focused on the composition of multidisciplinary team,facilities and services that PIBD center should provide.Process QIs highlight core requirements in diagnosing,evaluating,treating PIBD,and disease follow-up.Outcome QIs mainly included criteria evaluating effectiveness of various interventions in PIBD centers.Conclusion The present Delphi consensus developed a set of main QIs that may be useful for managing a PIBD center.展开更多
基金supported by a grant from the Key Program of the Independent Design Project of National Clinical Research Center for Child Health.
文摘Background Good quality of care for inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)depends on high-standard management and facility in the IBD center.Yet,there are no clear measures or criteria for evaluating pediatric IBD(PIBD)center in China.The aim of this study was to develop a comprehensive set of quality indicators(QIs)for evaluating PIBD center in China.Methods A modified Delphi consensus-based approach was used to identify a set of QIs of structure,process,and outcomes for defining the criteria.The process included an exhaustive search using complementary approaches to identify potential QIs,and two web-based voting rounds to select the QIs defining the criteria for PIBD center.Results A total of 101 QIs(35 structures,48 processes and 18 outcomes)were included in this consensus.Structure QIs focused on the composition of multidisciplinary team,facilities and services that PIBD center should provide.Process QIs highlight core requirements in diagnosing,evaluating,treating PIBD,and disease follow-up.Outcome QIs mainly included criteria evaluating effectiveness of various interventions in PIBD centers.Conclusion The present Delphi consensus developed a set of main QIs that may be useful for managing a PIBD center.