In the context of the whole-of-government strategic approach the United States(US)currently applies toward China,the Democratic and Republican parties have reached a consensus on“using Taiwan to contain China,”compr...In the context of the whole-of-government strategic approach the United States(US)currently applies toward China,the Democratic and Republican parties have reached a consensus on“using Taiwan to contain China,”compromising the integrity of the one-China policy and seriously eroding the political foundations of China–US relations.However,considerable differences persist between the two parties regarding Taiwan policy.The Republicans,as represented by Donald Trump,have appeared more radical and more straightforward,whereas the incumbent Biden administration of the Democratic Party has shown significant duplicity.Democrats in the US Congress have introduced relatively fewer Taiwan-related bills than their Republican counterparts;by comparison,some Republican lawmakers have even introduced resolutions calling for resuming“diplomatic ties”with Taiwan.The Taiwan policy gap between the Democratic and Republican parties mirrors their differences on China policy:liberal think tanks advocate for“strategic ambiguity”on Taiwan,but conservatives back“strategic clarity.”And the gap also ref lects the shifting lobbying priorities of Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party.Looking ahead to the upcoming decade,the Democratic and Republican par ties will continue to compete to“support Taiwan,”thus rendering the Taiwan question even more dangerous.After 2024,if Democrats remain in power,they may hasten the“internationalization”of the Taiwan question;otherwise,if Republicans return to the White House and both chambers of Congress,China and the US may find their relationship even more confrontational.Although the political situation in Taiwan will very unlikely have any fundamental impact on the Taiwan Strait,it will,to a certain extent,influence the intensity of China–US rivalry.展开更多
At the beginning of 2023, the Eurasia Group, a US-based global political risk consultancy, named “the fragmentation of the United States” as one of the top ten global risks in 2023. Looking back at 2023, there is no...At the beginning of 2023, the Eurasia Group, a US-based global political risk consultancy, named “the fragmentation of the United States” as one of the top ten global risks in 2023. Looking back at 2023, there is no better keyword to characterize the United States than “divided.”展开更多
The crisis in Ukraine,which has dragged on for more than two years,and whether military aid to Ukraine should continue are major issues debated and fought over by the two parties in the United States prior to the 2024...The crisis in Ukraine,which has dragged on for more than two years,and whether military aid to Ukraine should continue are major issues debated and fought over by the two parties in the United States prior to the 2024 election.Regarding whether to continue to aid Ukraine,various political forces in the United States have chosen sides in the election campaign,which can be roughly divided into the“aid camp”and the“stop-aid camp”according to their positions.展开更多
Under the great changes unseen in a century,comprehensive containment and suppression of China in the name of strategic competition has become a crossparty consensus in the United States,with the Republican Trump admi...Under the great changes unseen in a century,comprehensive containment and suppression of China in the name of strategic competition has become a crossparty consensus in the United States,with the Republican Trump administration initiating the process of containing and suppressing China and the Democratic Biden administration continuing and developing such a strategy.In the process of implementing this strategy,there are some diff erences in the goals and means of the two American administrations.The Trump administration was trying to“crush China”with the super strength of the United States,with more extreme and tougher means,being more unilateralist and even going so far as to launch a“new Cold War”against China.The Biden administration,on the other hand,emphasizes long-term competition with China,and focuses on“managing competition”while suppressing China,accustomed to being double-handed and using both carrot and stick.When it comes to addressing global challenges,the Republican Party completely lacks the will to cooperate with China,while the Democratic Party has a certain need for cooperation and action.展开更多
目的观察联合降脂的干眼症治疗在干眼症合并高胆固醇血症患者中的效果。方法收集2015年1月至2016年12月在北京市东城区第一人民医院眼科和内科门诊就诊的干眼症同时合并高胆固醇血症患者100例(200只眼),年龄60~80岁,依据随机数字表法分...目的观察联合降脂的干眼症治疗在干眼症合并高胆固醇血症患者中的效果。方法收集2015年1月至2016年12月在北京市东城区第一人民医院眼科和内科门诊就诊的干眼症同时合并高胆固醇血症患者100例(200只眼),年龄60~80岁,依据随机数字表法分为试验组(降脂+干眼症治疗,50例)和对照组(无降脂+干眼症治疗,50例),干预6个月后,收集两组患者一般资料及临床检验、检查数据,检测血清总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL-C)等水平,行泪膜破裂时间(breac uptime,BUT)、泪液分泌试验(schirmer I test,SIT)、以及角膜光素染色(fluorescein staining,FL)检查,分析两组患者BUT、SIT及FL值差异,探讨上述值变化的影响因素。结果干预前试验组与对照组一般生化指标及BUT、SIT、FL值比较,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);干预6个月后,试验组患者BUT、SIT值均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);协方差分析校正TC、LDL-C后,试验组患者BUT值仍高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);多元线性回归分析,血清LDL-C下降值与试验组BUT、SIT增加值呈正相关(P<0.05)。结论联合降脂治疗对合并高胆固醇血症干眼症患者的干眼治疗有益。展开更多
基金the phased result of a key project supported by the National Social Science Fund of China in 2022 entitled“A Comparative Study of the Shifting Political Ecology in the United States and the China Policy of Its Two Major Parties”(Grant Number:22AGJ011)。
文摘In the context of the whole-of-government strategic approach the United States(US)currently applies toward China,the Democratic and Republican parties have reached a consensus on“using Taiwan to contain China,”compromising the integrity of the one-China policy and seriously eroding the political foundations of China–US relations.However,considerable differences persist between the two parties regarding Taiwan policy.The Republicans,as represented by Donald Trump,have appeared more radical and more straightforward,whereas the incumbent Biden administration of the Democratic Party has shown significant duplicity.Democrats in the US Congress have introduced relatively fewer Taiwan-related bills than their Republican counterparts;by comparison,some Republican lawmakers have even introduced resolutions calling for resuming“diplomatic ties”with Taiwan.The Taiwan policy gap between the Democratic and Republican parties mirrors their differences on China policy:liberal think tanks advocate for“strategic ambiguity”on Taiwan,but conservatives back“strategic clarity.”And the gap also ref lects the shifting lobbying priorities of Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party.Looking ahead to the upcoming decade,the Democratic and Republican par ties will continue to compete to“support Taiwan,”thus rendering the Taiwan question even more dangerous.After 2024,if Democrats remain in power,they may hasten the“internationalization”of the Taiwan question;otherwise,if Republicans return to the White House and both chambers of Congress,China and the US may find their relationship even more confrontational.Although the political situation in Taiwan will very unlikely have any fundamental impact on the Taiwan Strait,it will,to a certain extent,influence the intensity of China–US rivalry.
文摘At the beginning of 2023, the Eurasia Group, a US-based global political risk consultancy, named “the fragmentation of the United States” as one of the top ten global risks in 2023. Looking back at 2023, there is no better keyword to characterize the United States than “divided.”
文摘The crisis in Ukraine,which has dragged on for more than two years,and whether military aid to Ukraine should continue are major issues debated and fought over by the two parties in the United States prior to the 2024 election.Regarding whether to continue to aid Ukraine,various political forces in the United States have chosen sides in the election campaign,which can be roughly divided into the“aid camp”and the“stop-aid camp”according to their positions.
文摘Under the great changes unseen in a century,comprehensive containment and suppression of China in the name of strategic competition has become a crossparty consensus in the United States,with the Republican Trump administration initiating the process of containing and suppressing China and the Democratic Biden administration continuing and developing such a strategy.In the process of implementing this strategy,there are some diff erences in the goals and means of the two American administrations.The Trump administration was trying to“crush China”with the super strength of the United States,with more extreme and tougher means,being more unilateralist and even going so far as to launch a“new Cold War”against China.The Biden administration,on the other hand,emphasizes long-term competition with China,and focuses on“managing competition”while suppressing China,accustomed to being double-handed and using both carrot and stick.When it comes to addressing global challenges,the Republican Party completely lacks the will to cooperate with China,while the Democratic Party has a certain need for cooperation and action.
文摘目的观察联合降脂的干眼症治疗在干眼症合并高胆固醇血症患者中的效果。方法收集2015年1月至2016年12月在北京市东城区第一人民医院眼科和内科门诊就诊的干眼症同时合并高胆固醇血症患者100例(200只眼),年龄60~80岁,依据随机数字表法分为试验组(降脂+干眼症治疗,50例)和对照组(无降脂+干眼症治疗,50例),干预6个月后,收集两组患者一般资料及临床检验、检查数据,检测血清总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL-C)等水平,行泪膜破裂时间(breac uptime,BUT)、泪液分泌试验(schirmer I test,SIT)、以及角膜光素染色(fluorescein staining,FL)检查,分析两组患者BUT、SIT及FL值差异,探讨上述值变化的影响因素。结果干预前试验组与对照组一般生化指标及BUT、SIT、FL值比较,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);干预6个月后,试验组患者BUT、SIT值均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);协方差分析校正TC、LDL-C后,试验组患者BUT值仍高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);多元线性回归分析,血清LDL-C下降值与试验组BUT、SIT增加值呈正相关(P<0.05)。结论联合降脂治疗对合并高胆固醇血症干眼症患者的干眼治疗有益。
