In this paper,we mainly discuss a discrete estimation of the average differential entropy for a continuous time-stationary ergodic space-time random field.By estimating the probability value of a time-stationary rando...In this paper,we mainly discuss a discrete estimation of the average differential entropy for a continuous time-stationary ergodic space-time random field.By estimating the probability value of a time-stationary random field in a small range,we give an entropy estimation and obtain the average entropy estimation formula in a certain bounded space region.It can be proven that the estimation of the average differential entropy converges to the theoretical value with a probability of 1.In addition,we also conducted numerical experiments for different parameters to verify the convergence result obtained in the theoretical proofs.展开更多
The current researches mainly adopt "Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement(GUM)" to calculate the profile error. However, GUM can only be applied in the linear models. The standard GUM is not...The current researches mainly adopt "Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement(GUM)" to calculate the profile error. However, GUM can only be applied in the linear models. The standard GUM is not appropriate to calculate the uncertainty of profile error because the mathematical model of profile error is strongly non-linear. An improved second-order GUM method(GUMM) is proposed to calculate the uncertainty. At the same time, the uncertainties in different coordinate axes directions are calculated as the measuring points uncertainties. In addition, the correlations between variables could not be ignored while calculating the uncertainty. A k-factor conversion method is proposed to calculate the converge factor due to the unknown and asymmetrical distribution of the output quantity. Subsequently, the adaptive Monte Carlo method(AMCM) is used to evaluate whether the second-order GUMM is better. Two practical examples are listed and the conclusion is drawn by comparing and discussing the second-order GUMM and AMCM. The results show that the difference between the improved second-order GUM and the AMCM is smaller than the difference between the standard GUM and the AMCM. The improved second-order GUMM is more precise in consideration of the nonlinear mathematical model of profile error.展开更多
基金supported by the Shenzhen sustainable development project:KCXFZ 20201221173013036 and the National Natural Science Foundation of China(91746107).
文摘In this paper,we mainly discuss a discrete estimation of the average differential entropy for a continuous time-stationary ergodic space-time random field.By estimating the probability value of a time-stationary random field in a small range,we give an entropy estimation and obtain the average entropy estimation formula in a certain bounded space region.It can be proven that the estimation of the average differential entropy converges to the theoretical value with a probability of 1.In addition,we also conducted numerical experiments for different parameters to verify the convergence result obtained in the theoretical proofs.
基金Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.51675378)National Science and Technology Major Project of China(Grant No.2014ZX04014-031)
文摘The current researches mainly adopt "Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement(GUM)" to calculate the profile error. However, GUM can only be applied in the linear models. The standard GUM is not appropriate to calculate the uncertainty of profile error because the mathematical model of profile error is strongly non-linear. An improved second-order GUM method(GUMM) is proposed to calculate the uncertainty. At the same time, the uncertainties in different coordinate axes directions are calculated as the measuring points uncertainties. In addition, the correlations between variables could not be ignored while calculating the uncertainty. A k-factor conversion method is proposed to calculate the converge factor due to the unknown and asymmetrical distribution of the output quantity. Subsequently, the adaptive Monte Carlo method(AMCM) is used to evaluate whether the second-order GUMM is better. Two practical examples are listed and the conclusion is drawn by comparing and discussing the second-order GUMM and AMCM. The results show that the difference between the improved second-order GUM and the AMCM is smaller than the difference between the standard GUM and the AMCM. The improved second-order GUMM is more precise in consideration of the nonlinear mathematical model of profile error.
