期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
单发肝细胞癌合并微血管侵犯患者根治性切除术后辅助经导管动脉化疗栓塞治疗的疗效和安全性:一项随机临床试验
1
作者 Wei Wei Pei-En Jian +9 位作者 Shao-Hua Li zhi-xing guo Yong-Fa Zhang Yi-Hong Ling Xiao-Jun Lin Li Xu Ming Shi Lie Zheng Min-Shan Chen Rong-Ping guo 《癌症》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2019年第3期132-144,共13页
背景与目的单发肝细胞癌(hepatocellular carcinoma,HCC)合并微血管侵犯(microvascular invasion,MVI)患者根治性切除术后的最佳辅助治疗方案一直存有争议。本试验旨在评估肝切除术后辅助经导管动脉化疗栓塞(transcatheter arterial che... 背景与目的单发肝细胞癌(hepatocellular carcinoma,HCC)合并微血管侵犯(microvascular invasion,MVI)患者根治性切除术后的最佳辅助治疗方案一直存有争议。本试验旨在评估肝切除术后辅助经导管动脉化疗栓塞(transcatheter arterial chemoembolization,TACE)与单纯肝切除术对直径≥5 cm单发HCC合并MVI患者的疗效和安全性。方法在本随机、开放性、III期试验中,将直径≥5 cm单发HCC合并MVI患者随机分为2组(1∶1):在肝切除术后接受1–2个周期的辅助TACE治疗(肝切除–TACE组)或单纯接受肝切除(单纯肝切除组)。主要终点是无病生存期(disease-free survival,DFS),次要终点包括总生存期(overall survival,OS)和不良事件。结果在2009年6月1日至2012年12月31日期间,共纳入250例患者,随机分为肝切除–TACE组(n=125)或单纯肝切除组(n=125)。两组患者的临床病理特征相似。从随机开始的中位随访时间为37.5个月(四分位距为18.3–48.2个月)。肝切除–TACE组的中位DFS显著长于单纯肝切除组[17.45个月(95%置信区间,confidence interval,CI:11.99–29.14)vs. 9.27个月(95%CI:6.05–13.70),风险比(hazard ratio,HR)=0.70(95%CI:0.52–0.95),P=0.020]。肝切除–TACE组中位OS也显著长于单纯肝切除组[44.29个月(95%CI:25.99–62.58)vs. 22.37个月(95%CI:10.84–33.91),HR=0.68(95%CI:0.48–0.97),P=0.029]。治疗相关不良事件在肝切除–TACE组中更为多见,虽然这些不良事件一般都是轻度和可控的。两组中最常见的3级或4级不良事件为中性粒细胞减少和肝功能异常。结论对于直径≥5 cm单发HCC合并MVI患者,根治术后进行辅助TACE治疗是一种合适的选择,且毒性是可接受的。 展开更多
关键词 单发肿瘤 肝细胞癌 辅助治疗 经导管动脉化疗栓塞 单纯肝切除术 微血管侵犯
下载PDF
Adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with solitary tumor and microvascular invasion: a randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety 被引量:74
2
作者 Wei Wei Pei-En Jian +9 位作者 Shao-Hua Li zhi-xing guo Yong-Fa Zhang Yi-Hong Ling Xiao-Jun Lin Li Xu Ming Shi Lie Zheng Min-Shan Chen Rong-Ping guo 《Cancer Communications》 SCIE 2018年第1期655-666,共12页
Background:The optimal strategy for adjuvant therapy after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)patients with solitary tumor and microvascular invasion(MVI)is controversial.This trial evaluated the effi... Background:The optimal strategy for adjuvant therapy after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)patients with solitary tumor and microvascular invasion(MVI)is controversial.This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE)after hepatectomy versus hepatectomy alone in HCC patients with a solitary tumor≥5 cm and MVI.Methods:In this randomized,open-labeled,phase III trial,HCC patients with a solitary tumor≥5 cm and MVI were randomly assigned(1:1)to receive either 1-2 cycles of adjuvant TACE after hepatectomy(Hepatectomy-TACE)or hepatectomy alone(Hepatectomy Alone).The primary endpoint was disease-free survival(DFS);the secondary end-points included overall survival(OS)and adverse events.Results:Between June 1,2009,and December 31,2012,250 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the Hepatectomy-TACE group(n=125)or the Hepatectomy Alone group(n=125).Clinicopathological characteristics were balanced between the two groups.The median follow-up time from randomization was 37.5 months[interquartile range 18.3-48.2 months].The median DFS was significantly longer in the Hepatectomy-TACE group than in the Hepatectomy Alone group[17.45 months(95%confidence interval[CI]11.99-29.14)vs.9.27 months(95%CI 6.05-13.70),hazard ratio[HR]=0.70(95%CI 0.52-0.95),P=0.020],respectively.The median OS was also significantly longer in the Hepatectomy-TACE group than in the Hepatectomy Alone group[44.29 months(95%CI 25.99-62.58)vs.22.37 months(95%CI 10.84-33.91),HR=0.68(95%CI 0.48-0.97),P=0.029].Treatment-related adverse events were more frequently observed in the Hepatectomy-TACE group,although these were generally mild and manageable.The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events in both groups were neutropenia and liver dysfunction.Conclusion:Hepatectomy followed by adjuvant TACE is an appropriate option after radical resection in HCC patients with solitary tumor≥5 cm and MVI,with acceptable toxicity. 展开更多
关键词 Solitary tumor Hepatocellular carcinoma Adjuvant therapy Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization Hepatectomy alone Microvascular invasion
原文传递
Adherent coating on gradient cemented carbide with ultrafine Ti(C_(0.5),N_(0.5)) 被引量:4
3
作者 Tian-En Yang Lan Sun +3 位作者 Ji Xiong zhi-xing guo Lei Wang Ding Cao 《Rare Metals》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2015年第6期413-420,共8页
Gradient cemented carbide is usually employed as the snbstrate for coated carbide insert. In this work, gradient cemented carbide with ultrafine Ti(C0.5,N0.5) was prepared and its microstructure and properties were ... Gradient cemented carbide is usually employed as the snbstrate for coated carbide insert. In this work, gradient cemented carbide with ultrafine Ti(C0.5,N0.5) was prepared and its microstructure and properties were researched. Moreover, this novel substrate was coated to investigate cutting performance. It is found that the average WC grain size in the gradient zone is larger than that in the bulk. Owing to ultrafine Ti(C0.5,N0.5) introduction, gradient cemented carbide prepared by vacuum sintering exhibits full densification. By contrast, the gradient cemented carbide with ultrafine Ti(C0.5,N0.5) shows higher transverse rupture strength (TRS) and hardness than the homogenous one. Gradient cemented carbide suffers small TRS reduction after coating, and the bonding between coatings and gradient substrate is tidy and compact. The coated gradient cemented carbide shows much better endurance and impact resistance than the coated homogenous one. It confirms the superiority of gradient cemented carbide when used as the substrate for coating inserts. 展开更多
关键词 Gradient cemented carbide UltrafineTi(C0.5 N0.5) Vacuum sintering Transverse rupturestrength Cutting performance
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部