Objective: To evaluate whether the combination of Uremic clearance granule with Alprostadil is superior to Alprostadil alone for CRF. Methods: Relevant RCTs were searched through March 2019. Data were analyzed by Stat...Objective: To evaluate whether the combination of Uremic clearance granule with Alprostadil is superior to Alprostadil alone for CRF. Methods: Relevant RCTs were searched through March 2019. Data were analyzed by Stata 15.0. Results: Nine articles involving 726 patients were enrolled in this study. Meta-analysis showed that the total effective rate [OR = 3.68 (2.44, 5.55), P < 0.001], Scr [SMD =-2.34 (-3.49,-1.19), P < 0.001], BUN [SMD =-1.80 (-2.73,-0.87), P < 0.001], Ccr [SMD = 0.71 (0.44, 0.97), P < 0.001] were better in the experimental group. But there were no significant difference in UA, CysC, 24h-Upro and incidence of adverse reactions (all P > 0.05) between two groups. No serious adverse reactions were found. Conclusions: The effect of the integrated medicine on CRF was better than Alprostadil alone. Uremic clearance granule is safe and has no obvious adverse reactions.展开更多
文摘Objective: To evaluate whether the combination of Uremic clearance granule with Alprostadil is superior to Alprostadil alone for CRF. Methods: Relevant RCTs were searched through March 2019. Data were analyzed by Stata 15.0. Results: Nine articles involving 726 patients were enrolled in this study. Meta-analysis showed that the total effective rate [OR = 3.68 (2.44, 5.55), P < 0.001], Scr [SMD =-2.34 (-3.49,-1.19), P < 0.001], BUN [SMD =-1.80 (-2.73,-0.87), P < 0.001], Ccr [SMD = 0.71 (0.44, 0.97), P < 0.001] were better in the experimental group. But there were no significant difference in UA, CysC, 24h-Upro and incidence of adverse reactions (all P > 0.05) between two groups. No serious adverse reactions were found. Conclusions: The effect of the integrated medicine on CRF was better than Alprostadil alone. Uremic clearance granule is safe and has no obvious adverse reactions.
