AIM: to evaluate addition of boceprevir to peginterferon/ribavirin(PR) in Russian patients with chronic hepatitis C virus(HCV).METHODS: treatment-naive(t N) and treatmentexperienced(t E) patients(who had failed prior ...AIM: to evaluate addition of boceprevir to peginterferon/ribavirin(PR) in Russian patients with chronic hepatitis C virus(HCV).METHODS: treatment-naive(t N) and treatmentexperienced(t E) patients(who had failed prior treatment with PR for ≥ 12 wk) with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection were enrolled in this placebocontrolled, double-blind study. All patients initially received PR for 4 wk. Patients randomized to control treatment then received PR for an additional 44 wk. t N patients randomized to triple therapy received boceprevir(800 mg three times daily) plus PR for 24 wk and then further therapy according to treatment week 8(t W8) HCV RNA levels. t E patients received boceprevir plus PR for 32 wk and then further therapy according to t W8 HCV RNA levels. treatment was discontinued for t N patients with detectable HCV RNA at t W24 and t E patients with detectable HCV RNA at t W12 because of futility. the primary efficacy end point was sustained virologic response(SVR) defined as undetectable HCV RNA 24 wk after completing all study therapy.RESULTS: SVR was 74.8% in the boceprevir plus PR arm compared with 46.2% in the control arm, with a stratification-adjusted treatment difference of 29.2%(95%CI: 16.4-41.5; P < 0.0001). Rates of SVR were higher in the boceprevir arm in both t N and t E patient groups(t N 78.4% vs 56.3%; t E 69.4% vs 30.0%). Within t E patients, the rates of SVR were higher with boceprevir plus PR compared with PR, regardless of treatment failure type(null responder, partial responder, and relapser). Most patients receiving boceprevir plus PR in both t N(86%) and t E(71%) populations were eligible for reduced treatment duration. Anemia was increased in patients receiving boceprevir plus PR vs PR alone(47.2% vs 24.4%); there was a corresponding increase in ribavirin dose reduction and erythropoietin use. Among patients receiving boceprevir plus PR, SVR rates were similar in patients with anemia(< 10 g/d L) and those without anemia(71.2% vs 77.4%).CONCLUSION: Regulatory approval has been obtained for boceprevir plus PR in Russian patients with HCV genotype 1 infection based on the results of this study.展开更多
文摘AIM: to evaluate addition of boceprevir to peginterferon/ribavirin(PR) in Russian patients with chronic hepatitis C virus(HCV).METHODS: treatment-naive(t N) and treatmentexperienced(t E) patients(who had failed prior treatment with PR for ≥ 12 wk) with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection were enrolled in this placebocontrolled, double-blind study. All patients initially received PR for 4 wk. Patients randomized to control treatment then received PR for an additional 44 wk. t N patients randomized to triple therapy received boceprevir(800 mg three times daily) plus PR for 24 wk and then further therapy according to treatment week 8(t W8) HCV RNA levels. t E patients received boceprevir plus PR for 32 wk and then further therapy according to t W8 HCV RNA levels. treatment was discontinued for t N patients with detectable HCV RNA at t W24 and t E patients with detectable HCV RNA at t W12 because of futility. the primary efficacy end point was sustained virologic response(SVR) defined as undetectable HCV RNA 24 wk after completing all study therapy.RESULTS: SVR was 74.8% in the boceprevir plus PR arm compared with 46.2% in the control arm, with a stratification-adjusted treatment difference of 29.2%(95%CI: 16.4-41.5; P < 0.0001). Rates of SVR were higher in the boceprevir arm in both t N and t E patient groups(t N 78.4% vs 56.3%; t E 69.4% vs 30.0%). Within t E patients, the rates of SVR were higher with boceprevir plus PR compared with PR, regardless of treatment failure type(null responder, partial responder, and relapser). Most patients receiving boceprevir plus PR in both t N(86%) and t E(71%) populations were eligible for reduced treatment duration. Anemia was increased in patients receiving boceprevir plus PR vs PR alone(47.2% vs 24.4%); there was a corresponding increase in ribavirin dose reduction and erythropoietin use. Among patients receiving boceprevir plus PR, SVR rates were similar in patients with anemia(< 10 g/d L) and those without anemia(71.2% vs 77.4%).CONCLUSION: Regulatory approval has been obtained for boceprevir plus PR in Russian patients with HCV genotype 1 infection based on the results of this study.
