The text discussed the view put forward by Professor Zhangboquan. There is no existence of Northern Fuyu that founded its capital in Heshenggu and Eastern Fuyu that founded its capital in Jiayeyuan. According to < ...The text discussed the view put forward by Professor Zhangboquan. There is no existence of Northern Fuyu that founded its capital in Heshenggu and Eastern Fuyu that founded its capital in Jiayeyuan. According to < San guo zhi >, "Ruo River in the north"of Fuyu means the Second Songhuajiang River rather than Heilongjiang River, "Coing west near Yan State"means Fuyu people emigrated westward from the Second Songhuajiang River. Doumolou’s foundation is not on north of the area where Heilongjiang River and the Second Songhuajiang River converge, so it is impossible that Doumolou is the motherland of Fuyu. It is coafirmed by the offi- cial seals of the Han Dynasty that"FUZU" (夫租) in < Han shu > was a mistake of "Yaozu" (夭 租) .Yaozu and Fuyu are quite different.展开更多
Archaeology of Heilongjiang emerged in 1920s. It almost concided with China’s archaeology. The paper concisely reviews the developing courses of Heilongiiang’s archaeology. On the basis, It concludes something about...Archaeology of Heilongjiang emerged in 1920s. It almost concided with China’s archaeology. The paper concisely reviews the developing courses of Heilongiiang’s archaeology. On the basis, It concludes something about the developing cause、 theory、 method、 state of researching group and academic achievements in different periods. Further more, It points out some undesirable phenomena, such as laying particular stress on history, ignoring nationality researching; Data publishing slowly; Temporal shortage of researching groups; Absence of theory and method studying. In fact, Heilongjiang’s archaeology should be foe Northeast archaeology of China, and the Northeast Asia’s archaeology of the world. In order to realize this aim, we must draw up some developing strategies. These include paying more attention to qualified persons、 carrying out connecting subjects and topic researching、 introducing natural scientific method and collaborating items etc.展开更多
The Xiaobalang site lies on North Hill at Xiaobalang Village in Huanan County, Heilongjiang Province. In 1994, the Jiamusi Municipal Station for the Preservation of Ancient Monuments carried out there excavation in co...The Xiaobalang site lies on North Hill at Xiaobalang Village in Huanan County, Heilongjiang Province. In 1994, the Jiamusi Municipal Station for the Preservation of Ancient Monuments carried out there excavation in cooperation with Jilin University, and revealed an area of 1,450 sq m. The work brought to light eight house-foundations, six ash-pits and three tombs. The unearthed objects include various pottery vessels, stone tools, irons, bronzes and bone, horn and ivory artifacts, as well as “wuzhu” coins and animal remains. The site shows much similarity to the Guntuling site in cultural connotation and must have belonged to the Guntuling culture. It goes back roughly to the Han-Wei period according to ^14C-dating and the features of the unearthed coins.展开更多
Attention has been always focused on Mohe-Bohai archeological discovery and research by both domestic and abroad academic circles. Since 1980s, the Chinese archeologists have excavated a considerable number of cultura...Attention has been always focused on Mohe-Bohai archeological discovery and research by both domestic and abroad academic circles. Since 1980s, the Chinese archeologists have excavated a considerable number of cultural remains of that Period and made a break - through in its rescuer. This essay summarizes the domestic discovery, excavation and relevant research result in recent 20 years of all kinds of archeological remains during Mohe - Bohai period, and a certain vicw on some questions is raised as well. It is specially emphasized in this paper that a group of middle - aged and young scholars has grown mature, and playing a leading role in this field. Thecae can combine the documents with the archeological materials organically and have pushed the research into a new stage with rigorous discussion and original opinions.展开更多
文摘The text discussed the view put forward by Professor Zhangboquan. There is no existence of Northern Fuyu that founded its capital in Heshenggu and Eastern Fuyu that founded its capital in Jiayeyuan. According to < San guo zhi >, "Ruo River in the north"of Fuyu means the Second Songhuajiang River rather than Heilongjiang River, "Coing west near Yan State"means Fuyu people emigrated westward from the Second Songhuajiang River. Doumolou’s foundation is not on north of the area where Heilongjiang River and the Second Songhuajiang River converge, so it is impossible that Doumolou is the motherland of Fuyu. It is coafirmed by the offi- cial seals of the Han Dynasty that"FUZU" (夫租) in < Han shu > was a mistake of "Yaozu" (夭 租) .Yaozu and Fuyu are quite different.
文摘Archaeology of Heilongjiang emerged in 1920s. It almost concided with China’s archaeology. The paper concisely reviews the developing courses of Heilongiiang’s archaeology. On the basis, It concludes something about the developing cause、 theory、 method、 state of researching group and academic achievements in different periods. Further more, It points out some undesirable phenomena, such as laying particular stress on history, ignoring nationality researching; Data publishing slowly; Temporal shortage of researching groups; Absence of theory and method studying. In fact, Heilongjiang’s archaeology should be foe Northeast archaeology of China, and the Northeast Asia’s archaeology of the world. In order to realize this aim, we must draw up some developing strategies. These include paying more attention to qualified persons、 carrying out connecting subjects and topic researching、 introducing natural scientific method and collaborating items etc.
文摘The Xiaobalang site lies on North Hill at Xiaobalang Village in Huanan County, Heilongjiang Province. In 1994, the Jiamusi Municipal Station for the Preservation of Ancient Monuments carried out there excavation in cooperation with Jilin University, and revealed an area of 1,450 sq m. The work brought to light eight house-foundations, six ash-pits and three tombs. The unearthed objects include various pottery vessels, stone tools, irons, bronzes and bone, horn and ivory artifacts, as well as “wuzhu” coins and animal remains. The site shows much similarity to the Guntuling site in cultural connotation and must have belonged to the Guntuling culture. It goes back roughly to the Han-Wei period according to ^14C-dating and the features of the unearthed coins.
文摘Attention has been always focused on Mohe-Bohai archeological discovery and research by both domestic and abroad academic circles. Since 1980s, the Chinese archeologists have excavated a considerable number of cultural remains of that Period and made a break - through in its rescuer. This essay summarizes the domestic discovery, excavation and relevant research result in recent 20 years of all kinds of archeological remains during Mohe - Bohai period, and a certain vicw on some questions is raised as well. It is specially emphasized in this paper that a group of middle - aged and young scholars has grown mature, and playing a leading role in this field. Thecae can combine the documents with the archeological materials organically and have pushed the research into a new stage with rigorous discussion and original opinions.
