期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Overreliance on Net Export and Investment Impedes China's Structural Transformation: Estimation and Analysis Based on a Multi-Sector Growth Model
1
作者 渠慎宁 李鹏飞 吕铁 《China Economist》 2019年第3期44-65,共22页
Since reform and opening-up in 1978, changes in China's industrial structure have generally followed the pattern of "Kuznets facts" but still exhibits some unique characteristics, which led us to raise t... Since reform and opening-up in 1978, changes in China's industrial structure have generally followed the pattern of "Kuznets facts" but still exhibits some unique characteristics, which led us to raise the following three questions regarding China's structural transformation:(1) Why did the share of China's agricultural and manufacturing employment reduce/increase intermittently rather than continuously?(2) Why did the share of China's agricultural employment increase during certain periods? When the share of manufacturing employment reduced, why did the workforce reversely flow into agriculture rather than move to the service sector?(3) Why did growth in the share of China's service sector employment decelerate before reaching its peak? Why did the share of employment in the industrial sector suddenly increase after an abrupt decline? This paper creates a multisector economic growth model that contains non-homothetic preferences and differentiated productivity, and incorporates the "two drivers" therein for a demand-side estimation and analysis. The result shows that China's economic growth model driven by net export and investment is a critical factor for explaining the three questions regarding its structural transformation. This paper believes that only by implementing supply-side structural reforms, reducing the dependence on net export and investment, and achieving sustainable endogenous economic growth will China be able to expedite its industrial restructuring. 展开更多
关键词 STRUCTURAL transformation net EXPORT and INVESTMENT multi-sector economic growth model supply-side STRUCTURAL REFORMS
下载PDF
资本深化与行业全要素生产率增长——来自中国工业1990-2013年的经验证据 被引量:9
2
作者 孙早 刘李华 《经济评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第4期3-16,共14页
本文从资本深化的行业特征、结构及动因三个维度刻画并检验了转型时期资本深化对工业全要素生产率增长的效应,为新常态下促进工业全要素生产率增长、实现增长方式转变提供了理论依据和经验支撑。研究发现:资本密集度高的行业,资本深化... 本文从资本深化的行业特征、结构及动因三个维度刻画并检验了转型时期资本深化对工业全要素生产率增长的效应,为新常态下促进工业全要素生产率增长、实现增长方式转变提供了理论依据和经验支撑。研究发现:资本密集度高的行业,资本深化对全要素生产率增长的促进作用较低;设备投资占固定资产投资比重的提高,并没有显著增强资本深化对全要素生产率增长的影响;当资本深化由政府政策推动时,资本深化对全要素生产率增长的推动作用较小;国有企业总产值增长率较高的行业,资本深化对全要素生产率增长的正向作用较小,但所有制结构远不是解释全要素生产率变化的最主要理由。本文具有深刻的政策含义:应进一步提高设备投资在固定资产投资中的比重,提升设备的技术含量对资本密集型行业尤为重要;所有制结构改革并不必然要求所有制结构的重大调整,重点应是提高国有企业的效率。 展开更多
关键词 资本深化 所有制结构 全要素生产率增长 技术进步
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部