期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
China's Low Export Markups Puzzle: Competition Effect and Selection Effect
1
作者 Xu Ming 《China Economist》 2019年第3期98-113,共16页
Based on China's industrial enterprises-customs matched data, this paper utilizes two-tier stochastic frontier analysis method to estimate and verify the extent to which selection effect and competition effect inf... Based on China's industrial enterprises-customs matched data, this paper utilizes two-tier stochastic frontier analysis method to estimate and verify the extent to which selection effect and competition effect influence exporting firms' markup. Our findings suggest that the interaction between selection effect and competition effect ultimately causes actual firm markup to be higher than the baseline markup by 7.11%. Exporting firms' actual markup is higher than the baseline markup by different degrees. In terms of the decomposition of selection effect, TFP explains for 28.05% of selection effect, and nonproductivity factors explain for the rest 71.95%. By controlling for the type of firms' export,the export-productivity paradox only exists for processing trade firms, which shows that with increasing trade facilitation, the policy incentives to encourage firms to export are major contributors to the low export markups. 展开更多
关键词 LOW EXPORT MARKUPS PUZZLE COMPETITION EFFECT selection EFFECT two-tier stochastic frontier analysis
下载PDF
中国出口低加成率之谜:竞争效应还是选择效应 被引量:33
2
作者 许明 李逸飞 《世界经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第8期77-102,共26页
本文基于中国工业企业-海关匹配数据,利用双边随机前沿分析方法测度和验证了选择效应和竞争效应对出口企业加成率的影响。研究结果表明:选择效应和竞争效应的相互作用最终导致出口企业实际加成率高于基准加成率7.11%;出口企业的实际加... 本文基于中国工业企业-海关匹配数据,利用双边随机前沿分析方法测度和验证了选择效应和竞争效应对出口企业加成率的影响。研究结果表明:选择效应和竞争效应的相互作用最终导致出口企业实际加成率高于基准加成率7.11%;出口企业的实际加成率虽然不同程度的高于基准加成率,但异质性分组回归结果表明,选择效应对出口企业加成率的提升有限,而竞争效应又抵消了部分选择效应的正向影响;从选择效应分解看,全要素生产率可以解释28.05%,非生产率因素可以解释71.95%。通过控制企业出口贸易类型回归发现,"出口-生产率悖论"仅在纯加工贸易企业存在,过度激励企业从事出口贸易是形成中国出口企业低加成率之谜的重要原因。 展开更多
关键词 出口低加成率之谜 竞争效应 选择效应 双边随机前沿分析
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部