目的 分析老年胆总管结石患者应用经腹腔镜胆总管切开探查并取石术(Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Ex-ploration,LCBDE)并一期缝合与并T形管引流治疗取得的疗效。方法 采用目的抽样法选取2020年2月—2023年12月安徽省池州市人民医院78...目的 分析老年胆总管结石患者应用经腹腔镜胆总管切开探查并取石术(Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Ex-ploration,LCBDE)并一期缝合与并T形管引流治疗取得的疗效。方法 采用目的抽样法选取2020年2月—2023年12月安徽省池州市人民医院78例老年胆总管结石患者为研究对象(均行LCBDE术治疗),按照治疗方法不同分为两组,每组39例,分别提供一期缝合治疗(观察组)和T形管引流治疗(对照组),比较两组手术时间、引流时间、住院时间、出血量、并发症发生率。结果 两组引流时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组手术时间、住院时间短于对照组,出血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。观察组水电解质紊乱率(2.56%)、胆道出血率为(0)、残余结石率(2.56%)、胆道感染率为(0)低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=3.924、5.343、3.924、5.343,P均<0.05)。结论 老年胆总管结石应用LCBDE术并一期缝合的效果更佳,相比于T形管引流治疗,可以更好地改善患者预后,应用价值高。展开更多
A retained bile duct stone after operation for cholelithiasis still occurs and causes symptoms such as biliary colic and obstructive jaundice.An endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic sphincter...A retained bile duct stone after operation for cholelithiasis still occurs and causes symptoms such as biliary colic and obstructive jaundice.An endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST),followed by stone extraction,are usually an effective treatment for this condition.However,these procedures are associated with severe complications including pancreatitis,bleeding,and duodenal perforation.Nitrates such as glyceryl trinitrate(GTN) and isosorbide dinitrate(ISDN) are known to relax the sphincter of Oddi.In 6 cases in which a retained stone was detected following cholecystectomy,topical nitrate drip infusion via cystic duct tube(C-tube) was carried out.Retained stones of 2-3 mm diameter and no dilated common bile duct in 3 patients were removed by drip infusion of 50 mg GTN or 10 mg ISDN,which was the regular dose of intravenous injection.Three other cases failed,and EST in 2 cases and endoscopic biliary balloon dilatation in 1 case were performed.One patient developed an adverse event of nausea.Severe complications were not observed.We consider the topical nitrate drip infusion via C-tube to be old but safe,easy,and inexpensive procedure for retained bile duct stone following cholecystectomy,inasmuch as removal rate was about 50% in our cases.展开更多
目的探讨腹腔镜胆总管探查术(laparoscopic common bile duct exploration,LCBDE)后拔除T管出现胆漏的诊治。方法回顾性分析我院2016年7月至2021年12月实施的LCBDE共1062例,其中919例留置T管,术后T管拔除时间为43~102 d,平均拔除时间82...目的探讨腹腔镜胆总管探查术(laparoscopic common bile duct exploration,LCBDE)后拔除T管出现胆漏的诊治。方法回顾性分析我院2016年7月至2021年12月实施的LCBDE共1062例,其中919例留置T管,术后T管拔除时间为43~102 d,平均拔除时间82 d,拔除T管后9例(0.9%)出现胆漏,分析归纳9例患者的临床资料。结果5例经窦道放置引流管,2例经窦道放置引流管联合腹腔穿刺引流,1例经窦道放置引流管并行腹腔穿刺引流联合内窥镜鼻胆管引流(endoscopic nasobiliary drainage,ENBD)引流;1例经窦道放置引流管联合ENBD引流,9例患者均治愈,平均住院天数22 d。结论LCBDE后拔除T管出现胆漏不能完全避免,且原因复杂,发生胆漏后可采用微创治疗,如放置窦道引流管、B超引导下腹腔穿刺引流、ENBD等,效果满意。展开更多
目的:探讨快速康复外科(ERAS)理念下经腹腔镜胆总管Ⅰ期缝合与传统T管引流对胆总管结石的应用效果。方法:选取2019年6月—2021年12月收治的胆总管结石患者133例,根据术中引流处理方式的不同分为ERAS组(59例)和传统组(74例)。传统组患者...目的:探讨快速康复外科(ERAS)理念下经腹腔镜胆总管Ⅰ期缝合与传统T管引流对胆总管结石的应用效果。方法:选取2019年6月—2021年12月收治的胆总管结石患者133例,根据术中引流处理方式的不同分为ERAS组(59例)和传统组(74例)。传统组患者使用术中胆总管切开T管引流,ERAS组采用快速康复外科理念下术中胆总管切开Ⅰ期缝合,术后随访6个月。比较两组患者围术期指标,观察两组患者手术前后疼痛评分,比较两组患者手术前后白蛋白指标和炎症因子水平,比较两组患者并发症发生情况。结果:ERAS组手术时间、排气和住院时间均短于传统组,术中出血量少于传统组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。ERAS组和传统组术前和术后3 d疼痛评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);ERAS组术后7 d和术后2周疼痛评分明显低于传统组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。术前两组患者白蛋白水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后1 d ERAS组谷丙转氨酶(ALT)和谷草转氨酶(AST)水平低于传统组,白蛋白(ALB)水平高于传统组;术后3 d ERAS组ALT,AST和ALB水平高于传统组(P<0.05)。术后7 d ERAS组白细胞计数(WBC)、降钙素原(PCT)和C反应蛋白(CRP)水平低于传统组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。ERAS组患者并发症发生率(1.69%)明显低于传统组(10.81%),差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.324,P=0.038)。结论:与传统T管引流比较,ERAS理念下经腹腔镜胆总管Ⅰ期缝合可缩短患者手术时间和住院时间,减少术中出血量,减轻患者疼痛,改善患者白蛋白水平和炎症反应,且并发症较少。展开更多
文摘目的 分析老年胆总管结石患者应用经腹腔镜胆总管切开探查并取石术(Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Ex-ploration,LCBDE)并一期缝合与并T形管引流治疗取得的疗效。方法 采用目的抽样法选取2020年2月—2023年12月安徽省池州市人民医院78例老年胆总管结石患者为研究对象(均行LCBDE术治疗),按照治疗方法不同分为两组,每组39例,分别提供一期缝合治疗(观察组)和T形管引流治疗(对照组),比较两组手术时间、引流时间、住院时间、出血量、并发症发生率。结果 两组引流时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组手术时间、住院时间短于对照组,出血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。观察组水电解质紊乱率(2.56%)、胆道出血率为(0)、残余结石率(2.56%)、胆道感染率为(0)低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=3.924、5.343、3.924、5.343,P均<0.05)。结论 老年胆总管结石应用LCBDE术并一期缝合的效果更佳,相比于T形管引流治疗,可以更好地改善患者预后,应用价值高。
文摘A retained bile duct stone after operation for cholelithiasis still occurs and causes symptoms such as biliary colic and obstructive jaundice.An endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST),followed by stone extraction,are usually an effective treatment for this condition.However,these procedures are associated with severe complications including pancreatitis,bleeding,and duodenal perforation.Nitrates such as glyceryl trinitrate(GTN) and isosorbide dinitrate(ISDN) are known to relax the sphincter of Oddi.In 6 cases in which a retained stone was detected following cholecystectomy,topical nitrate drip infusion via cystic duct tube(C-tube) was carried out.Retained stones of 2-3 mm diameter and no dilated common bile duct in 3 patients were removed by drip infusion of 50 mg GTN or 10 mg ISDN,which was the regular dose of intravenous injection.Three other cases failed,and EST in 2 cases and endoscopic biliary balloon dilatation in 1 case were performed.One patient developed an adverse event of nausea.Severe complications were not observed.We consider the topical nitrate drip infusion via C-tube to be old but safe,easy,and inexpensive procedure for retained bile duct stone following cholecystectomy,inasmuch as removal rate was about 50% in our cases.
文摘目的探讨腹腔镜胆总管探查术(laparoscopic common bile duct exploration,LCBDE)后拔除T管出现胆漏的诊治。方法回顾性分析我院2016年7月至2021年12月实施的LCBDE共1062例,其中919例留置T管,术后T管拔除时间为43~102 d,平均拔除时间82 d,拔除T管后9例(0.9%)出现胆漏,分析归纳9例患者的临床资料。结果5例经窦道放置引流管,2例经窦道放置引流管联合腹腔穿刺引流,1例经窦道放置引流管并行腹腔穿刺引流联合内窥镜鼻胆管引流(endoscopic nasobiliary drainage,ENBD)引流;1例经窦道放置引流管联合ENBD引流,9例患者均治愈,平均住院天数22 d。结论LCBDE后拔除T管出现胆漏不能完全避免,且原因复杂,发生胆漏后可采用微创治疗,如放置窦道引流管、B超引导下腹腔穿刺引流、ENBD等,效果满意。
文摘目的:探讨快速康复外科(ERAS)理念下经腹腔镜胆总管Ⅰ期缝合与传统T管引流对胆总管结石的应用效果。方法:选取2019年6月—2021年12月收治的胆总管结石患者133例,根据术中引流处理方式的不同分为ERAS组(59例)和传统组(74例)。传统组患者使用术中胆总管切开T管引流,ERAS组采用快速康复外科理念下术中胆总管切开Ⅰ期缝合,术后随访6个月。比较两组患者围术期指标,观察两组患者手术前后疼痛评分,比较两组患者手术前后白蛋白指标和炎症因子水平,比较两组患者并发症发生情况。结果:ERAS组手术时间、排气和住院时间均短于传统组,术中出血量少于传统组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。ERAS组和传统组术前和术后3 d疼痛评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);ERAS组术后7 d和术后2周疼痛评分明显低于传统组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。术前两组患者白蛋白水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后1 d ERAS组谷丙转氨酶(ALT)和谷草转氨酶(AST)水平低于传统组,白蛋白(ALB)水平高于传统组;术后3 d ERAS组ALT,AST和ALB水平高于传统组(P<0.05)。术后7 d ERAS组白细胞计数(WBC)、降钙素原(PCT)和C反应蛋白(CRP)水平低于传统组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。ERAS组患者并发症发生率(1.69%)明显低于传统组(10.81%),差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.324,P=0.038)。结论:与传统T管引流比较,ERAS理念下经腹腔镜胆总管Ⅰ期缝合可缩短患者手术时间和住院时间,减少术中出血量,减轻患者疼痛,改善患者白蛋白水平和炎症反应,且并发症较少。